Those were caused by Eurotrash putting their fingers on the scales. Had the Rhodies and Afrikaaners not been forced to stop the process, they would have cleaned house in short order, and SA in particular was well on the way to stability before the UN forced them to let black commies into government for... feels reasons, basically.
You mean the system under which we live in? Yeah, I wonder why.
If you define "capitalism" as "the system under which we live" then ... well ... I'd suggest that your definition of "capitalism" is so overbroad that trying to discuss it with you would be fruitless.
I'd instead suggest that we just limit our discussion to "bogeymen" and in that case, I can agree with you that "bogeymen" are very bad indeed.
I don't think that's going to be the case.
Things will collapse long before white people become a small minority.
Then we'll end up with open tribal/ethnic warfare, just like what happens everywhere else in the world when social structures collapse.
Then white people will 'win' again, for the same reasons they've won every other time.
And I don't say any of that with any sort of glee or self-satisfaction. It's just what seems almost inevitable to me.
'Cause Rhodesia and South Africa were wins, right?
Those were caused by Eurotrash putting their fingers on the scales. Had the Rhodies and Afrikaaners not been forced to stop the process, they would have cleaned house in short order, and SA in particular was well on the way to stability before the UN forced them to let black commies into government for... feels reasons, basically.
And you think it'll be any different elsewhere?
If not Eurotrash with their fingers on the scales, then why not the WEF, or the Chinks?
I'd argue that the fighting never really started in those places because the combat was one-sided.
I don't see the US going down that way.
Yeah, and you blame everything on capitalism, so I'll take your opinions with a bucket of salt.
The regime interferes with the economy way too fucking much to call it capitalism.
If you define "capitalism" as "the system under which we live" then ... well ... I'd suggest that your definition of "capitalism" is so overbroad that trying to discuss it with you would be fruitless.
I'd instead suggest that we just limit our discussion to "bogeymen" and in that case, I can agree with you that "bogeymen" are very bad indeed.