Making women work is the fastest way to flatline a population... less time for baby making. Successful women rarely go for guys that make less money... while successful men go for all levels of women.
Successful women are unhappy because they cant find a man that fits her unreasonable standard. So.. both men and women are not happy. Woman isnt satisfied and man gets no pussy cause hes too short or not as much money.
How are you so consistently wrong while getting a handful of things correct? It's like you can identify the variables but are utterly incapable of solving the equation.
Then don't. Nobody is forcing you. If you don't want to be a responsible member of society you can stay a bachelor and live a life of solitude, and nobody will be leeching off of you. The more extreme voices here that call for laws punishing single people have no more chance of making that happen than you have enacting your Nuremburg trials for feminism plan.
bachelor taxes, and pay-offs for getting married and having kids
I think taxation is theft. Are you against income taxes in general? If not, you can't really complain when state-enforced social engineering is used against you.
Once upon a time home-making was considered a vital and respectable role. Somewhere along the way we all got a concussion and started to see it as bottom bitch chore.
Women are pale imitations of men. They are less capable than men in almost every regard, and thus they truly serve one, and only one purpose: Creating more men.
That is the only value of a woman over a man - the woman creates new men.
Men are important, we need more of them, and thus women are a valuable resource.
A resource that is simultaneously a parasite, and preventing them from being parasites has been shown to be a deleterious mishandling of that resource. The birth rate is paramount. Nothing else matters. It is, after all, the very key to our continued existence.
Governments often get baby-making wrong. How do governments reduce birth rates? They "restrict and control" women. They don't pay women to have less kids, they tell women they have to have less kids or you will be penalized.
Often governments fail to do the reverse. They say to women, hey have more kids and we'll reward you. Women do not respond to this. If you want higher birth rates then you must force women into it. Have more kids OR WE WILL PUNISH YOU. Then you will get positive results.
And you have rendered yourself entirely irrelevant to human society until you die alone and forgotten.
Congratulations.
A hedonistic, cocaine-addled musician who can't figure out how to put on a condom is officially MORE USEFUL to the world than you are, and will contribute more to the future than you ever will.
But at least you won't get your feelings hurt again. That's what's important.
Wait, the MSM told me that in Best Korea, the government simply orders you to do something and kills you if you don't do it. So how is it possible that women are choosing to defy the wishes of their government, which I am also told is super unwholesome 100 chungus misogynistic?
Unless...I've been lied to this whole time? But that would mean CNN and FOX lied to me, and that's impossible!
Making women work is the fastest way to flatline a population... less time for baby making. Successful women rarely go for guys that make less money... while successful men go for all levels of women.
Successful women are unhappy because they cant find a man that fits her unreasonable standard. So.. both men and women are not happy. Woman isnt satisfied and man gets no pussy cause hes too short or not as much money.
Every woman with 2 or more children that I have ever known falls into one of two categories:
If you want a fertility rate above replacement, women need to basically think about nothing but cooking and babies.
The entire world understood this until about 1900, when a poisonous idea began to grip europe.
Do you realize how little that narrows it down?
Ultimately, it all has the same root.
and they still not happy and want more hehe
How are you so consistently wrong while getting a handful of things correct? It's like you can identify the variables but are utterly incapable of solving the equation.
It's not an accident.
Tell me you're a Jew without telling me you're a Jew.
And yet you keep leaping to their defense.
The only part of the equation he is wrong about it.
Look at Islam's birth rates.
Maybe have them, you know, take care of kids at home. Take care of the house. Get them to do some smaller jobs like making clothes or gardening.
Can. Not do. Can.
Notice the lack of "Of course I keep my home clean!" from the Imp.
Neckbeard Nest, confirmed.
Then don't. Nobody is forcing you. If you don't want to be a responsible member of society you can stay a bachelor and live a life of solitude, and nobody will be leeching off of you. The more extreme voices here that call for laws punishing single people have no more chance of making that happen than you have enacting your Nuremburg trials for feminism plan.
I think taxation is theft. Are you against income taxes in general? If not, you can't really complain when state-enforced social engineering is used against you.
Once upon a time home-making was considered a vital and respectable role. Somewhere along the way we all got a concussion and started to see it as bottom bitch chore.
Women are pale imitations of men. They are less capable than men in almost every regard, and thus they truly serve one, and only one purpose: Creating more men.
That is the only value of a woman over a man - the woman creates new men.
Men are important, we need more of them, and thus women are a valuable resource.
A resource that is simultaneously a parasite, and preventing them from being parasites has been shown to be a deleterious mishandling of that resource. The birth rate is paramount. Nothing else matters. It is, after all, the very key to our continued existence.
The alternative, and god willing, we soon get there, is artificial wombs. Hopefully, an all-male generation is technologically possible one day.
no. it was supposed to be a partnership. men work stressful, dangerous, crappy jobs. women give sex, babies and cook food.
but.. that dynamic is skewed.
Governments often get baby-making wrong. How do governments reduce birth rates? They "restrict and control" women. They don't pay women to have less kids, they tell women they have to have less kids or you will be penalized.
Often governments fail to do the reverse. They say to women, hey have more kids and we'll reward you. Women do not respond to this. If you want higher birth rates then you must force women into it. Have more kids OR WE WILL PUNISH YOU. Then you will get positive results.
And you have rendered yourself entirely irrelevant to human society until you die alone and forgotten.
Congratulations.
A hedonistic, cocaine-addled musician who can't figure out how to put on a condom is officially MORE USEFUL to the world than you are, and will contribute more to the future than you ever will.
But at least you won't get your feelings hurt again. That's what's important.
Screenshot
I told you this once before.
Then you'll die.
I don't think you understand the situation here. You say, "over my dead body". And I said "sure."
The funniest part is that it's not. But you still don't get the joke here.
Literally, this is a "your terms are acceptable." meme.
Wait, the MSM told me that in Best Korea, the government simply orders you to do something and kills you if you don't do it. So how is it possible that women are choosing to defy the wishes of their government, which I am also told is super unwholesome 100 chungus misogynistic?
Unless...I've been lied to this whole time? But that would mean CNN and FOX lied to me, and that's impossible!
Perhaps they could try not starving the mothers.