Women are also more likely to blame the Republican Party for the risk of violence — 38 percent place more blame on Republicans while 18 percent blame Democrats and 33 percent blame both equally. Among men, 32 percent blame Democrats, 24 percent blame Republicans and 30 percent blame both equally.
It begs the question: how does one expose the masses to the violence and support for it on the other side if mainstream sources are going to be so bluntly one-sided?
It's apparent that many women will just absorb whatever is put in front of them, and many people in general aren't so speculative to find out the truth for themselves.
if mainstream sources are going to be so bluntly one-sided
You absolutely have to control the media. That's the only way to win. When conquering enemy territory you immediately seize sources of propaganda for your side.
The Internet has given us more ways to go around the media and get our voices out to break the narrative spell over people, but that is quickly being put back under the regime's thumb with things like "hate speech" laws. If we let them shut it down, game over. If we ever take control, I'm for any laws that limit the power of mainstream media and give more power to random anons posting on sketchy forums.
many women will just absorb whatever is put in front of them
Culturally if we went back to more "patriarchal" families where the man is in charge and the woman follows, that would help. Legally, stronger defamation laws and holding publishers and "platforms" responsible for their content if it's false and libelous should help too. You could even take the chain of responsibility a step further: If a newsstand is selling a tabloid with the headline "REPUBLICAN MASS SHOOTER POSTED ANTI-IMMIGRANT RANT BEFORE ATTACK" prominently displayed to people walking by, why is the newsstand owner not participating in the delivery of propaganda too? He chooses what to sell.
I know there are women who are capable of rational thought, but for every one of them there are a hundred who just vote the way their emotions tell them to.
This actually makes me sad. Just shows how well media manipulation works. They have done a great job of massively overhyping Jan 6 while aggressively ignoring the summer of love and crime rates.
The libtard Democrats did wall-to-wall January 6 coverage throughout this year with their little dog and pony show, and the best they could do is get a 31/25 split in their favor, which is accounted for easily by considering that at least 31% of the country is die hard libtards anyway.
The poll was conducted in the week after Paul Pelosi, husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, was attacked at their home by an assailant with a hammer and subsequently hospitalized.
Lets assume it is true... at least republicans are doing this to the people in charge and not bruning down innocent neighborhoods, looting, racially motivated beatings.
This is why:
It begs the question: how does one expose the masses to the violence and support for it on the other side if mainstream sources are going to be so bluntly one-sided?
It's apparent that many women will just absorb whatever is put in front of them, and many people in general aren't so speculative to find out the truth for themselves.
You absolutely have to control the media. That's the only way to win. When conquering enemy territory you immediately seize sources of propaganda for your side.
The Internet has given us more ways to go around the media and get our voices out to break the narrative spell over people, but that is quickly being put back under the regime's thumb with things like "hate speech" laws. If we let them shut it down, game over. If we ever take control, I'm for any laws that limit the power of mainstream media and give more power to random anons posting on sketchy forums.
Culturally if we went back to more "patriarchal" families where the man is in charge and the woman follows, that would help. Legally, stronger defamation laws and holding publishers and "platforms" responsible for their content if it's false and libelous should help too. You could even take the chain of responsibility a step further: If a newsstand is selling a tabloid with the headline "REPUBLICAN MASS SHOOTER POSTED ANTI-IMMIGRANT RANT BEFORE ATTACK" prominently displayed to people walking by, why is the newsstand owner not participating in the delivery of propaganda too? He chooses what to sell.
The 19th amendment was a mistake.
I know there are women who are capable of rational thought, but for every one of them there are a hundred who just vote the way their emotions tell them to.
Classic Women moment
That male/female split is really just a Republican/Democrat split.
Good point
Insane
How about "Polls show people fell for relentless propaganda"?
This actually makes me sad. Just shows how well media manipulation works. They have done a great job of massively overhyping Jan 6 while aggressively ignoring the summer of love and crime rates.
If propaganda wasn't effective, they wouldn't bother.
The libtard Democrats did wall-to-wall January 6 coverage throughout this year with their little dog and pony show, and the best they could do is get a 31/25 split in their favor, which is accounted for easily by considering that at least 31% of the country is die hard libtards anyway.
People don't think for themselves, they think what the tellybox told them to think.
Interesting timing on this poll
Lets assume it is true... at least republicans are doing this to the people in charge and not bruning down innocent neighborhoods, looting, racially motivated beatings.
I don't even know whether to believe the numbers, since so many polls don't exist to represent reality but instead manufacture it
But I completely believe that people would be stupid enough to think this