What you see is not real. It never happened. It is nowhere to be found when you search for it with Google. It is not anywhere on YouTube. It did not air on any of the news networks.
The people love our dear leaders, specially AOC.
The people stand with Ukraine and support the continued financing of this war.
Two words: Watch network news and vote democrat or MAGA wins.
Not that I disagree with what they said, but both of them mentioning Tulsi Gabbard tells me that this is not organic and these guys are following marching orders.
AoC's fanclub would never mention Tulsi Gabbard as an example of anything except a DINO, as they have done for years. They'd never use her as an example of someone doing the right thing.
Interesting. They are definitely plants (Tulsi? Really? Yes I saw the 'announcement' yesterday) -- but how much overlap is there really between AOC simps and Tulsi simps?
This is the beginning of the Great Schism in the Democrat party. If the GOP crushes november, which I feel is increasingly likely, the fragile alliance of the dems is toast.
The progressives are going to try to push the party dinosaurs over the cliff into oblivion, but they forget all the money is with the neolib/neocon establishment. The real money in Washington would rather pay for senile and corrupt Feinstein to dodder around with a rubber stamp than to give a red cent to the people who celebrated CHOP in Seattle.
This is going to get really ugly, I just hope the republicans can use it to their advantage. I unfortunately suspect, however, that the neocons are going to get involved (uniparty gonna uniparty)
The total of 17 (seventeen) billion, which is a tiny part of America's annual defense budget (722 billion for 2022).
That's hilarious how so little demolished Russia's "superpower" army that actually believed they would could steamrolled all of NATO.
This is by far the most cost-effective American large scale military investment of all time. Ridicalously so. So much that you (plural as you got upvotes without being corrected) thought it must have been "hundreds of billions" involved.
To compare, Vietnam cost America 1 trillion in today's dollars, Iraq about 2 trillion, and the F-35 program maybe even more. (Also they just sentenced Alex Jones to pay 1 billion.)
That’s purely in aid though, how much has america spent on the conflict itself? Clearly they’re running a massive advertising/influencing campaign on top of the aid, and chances are they’re providing constant sat/intel feeds for the uke’s, neither of which are free.
All I’m saying is, this “conflict” is far from one-sided
Nothing to forget when it's only in your mind, and South Vietnam was always losing (ridicalous battles of even the "elite" forces like the VN Rangers with American air support being massacred in their hundreds by the outnumbered and of course outgunned VC). It's pretty hard to find an early battle that wasn't a VC victory. There was never any period during 1961-65 (the "pre-Marines" American involvement) when Saigon was winning, reversing the ever increasing communist gains. "Even" the Strategic Hamlet Program was hugely counterproductive, and so was the 1963 coup.
South Vietnamese started getting their shit together only later, with one of their greatest moments ironically during the final collapse (and while left all alone):
The last major battle of the Vietnam War was fought at Xuan Loc, only 37 miles east by northeast of Saigon. In April 1975 the town was the eastern anchor of South Vietnam’s final line of defense against the North Vietnamese rush to the capital. That line ran west through Bien Hoa, just north of Saigon, to Tay Ninh, near the Cambodian border. Once it broke, Saigon was doomed—and with it the Republic of Vietnam itself. When the North Vietnamese Army attacked Xuan Loc (pronounced Swan Lock) on April 9, the communists and almost everyone else expected the Army of the Republic of Vietnam’s 18th Division to collapse like a house of cards, as had so many other ARVN units during the NVA’s massive Spring Offensive of 1975. But ARVN forces under Brig. Gen. Le Minh Dao fought fiercely in a last-ditch effort to save their country. By the time Xuan Loc did fall 12 days later, most of the world was amazed at how well the ARVN had fought, and the NVA had paid a far steeper price than it expected. Indeed, the valiant stand at Xuan Loc by heavily outnumbered ARVN soldiers echoes the famed sacrifice of King Leonidas’ 300 Spartans facing Xerxes’ Persian masses at the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 B.C. Greece. The Persians then marched south and captured Athens.
Do you actually think they do "hundreds or billions" worth things there secretly?
Americans military trainers of and liaisons to the Ukrainians operate openly in Poland. (They're being joined by British, Canadians, French, and so on.)
OP is a brand new account made to post this. Likely russian agent.
I hope russia paid those shills for their little incoherent meltdowns. It would be extra sad if they got up and screamed about "Ukrainian nazis" for free like jannies. So Putin told all the shills to scream that nuclear war is coming? That's the talking point? LOL yeah bro, nobody actually believes it, though. We've been funding Ukraine for this whole year and no nuclear war yet! So I guess Putin isn't ready to end the world after all! LOL.
That's exactly what it looks like I'm seeing in this video.
And anyways to state the obvious, even if Putin was making serious nuke threats [he isn't], the moment you back down to those threats, you incentivize him to make more nuke threats and escalate them, and assuming you're not willing to let Putin fuck your wife, presumably you'll have to stand up to him eventually, right? Well, after being a bitch to him dozens of times, when you finally say "no", the odds of Putin actually nuking you are astronomically higher than if you said no to him right from the start. That's how the slippery slope works. So your appeasement actually dramatically increases the danger, it does not reduce it. This ought to be common sense, and our elites know this, which is why these silly little propaganda efforts are going to come to nothing.
Mate, the OP might be a Russian shill, fair enough. But you are only making it very clear that you are a shill with ridiculously transparent comments like this. And if you aren't being paid for it, then that's even worse - you're just donating your time to push someone else's talking points.
A few of them later changed their minds, including famously the Crimean meme woman, but not only her. They claimed they were deceived:
The latest member to speak out, Vyacheslav Markhaev, wrote on his Facebook account on Sunday that, under the pretext of recognizing two separatist enclaves as republics, “we hid plans to unleash a full-scale war with our closest neighbor.” Markhaev is a senator from Siberia.
He and the other two Communist members had been among the Duma deputies who voted in favor of a recent resolution recognizing the so-called Donetsk People’s Republic and the Luhansk People’s Republic. But in his Facebook statement, Mr. Markhaev said that Duma members were not informed of plans for a full-scale invasion, and that he believed a government decree saying troops would be sent in as peacekeepers.
Earlier that week, Oleg Smolin, another Communist member from Siberia, wrote on his Vkontakte social media profile that he was “shocked” when the invasion began. “As a Russian intellectual, I am convinced that military force should be used in politics only as a last resort,” he said, adding: “I could not vote for the recognition of the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics without betraying myself.”
The third Communist deputy, Mikhail Matveyev from the Samara region, said on social media that the war must be immediately stopped.
“I voted for peace, not for war,” he allegedly wrote on Twitter and Telegram, “For Russia to become a shield, so that Donbas is not bombed, and not for Kyiv to be bombed.”
He later deleted the posts, explaining in a Twitter thread that he was not doing it because he had changed his mind, but because his words had been reproduced “across the world, most often anonymously, to incite mutual hatred.”
“I just don’t have the time to delete hate comments created as part of the information war,” he added.
Mr. Matveyev explained that he supported peace, but he did not want to be seen as someone who “shoots our soldiers in the back while they are fighting where the politicians have sent them.”
“Ukraine is my Motherland,” he concluded, adding that he is hurt by everything that happens there.
And as for the meme girl (paging u/TheImpossible1):
Former Crimean Prosecutor Natalya Poklonskaya has been dismissed from her post in the Russian government, weeks after criticizing Moscow’s war in Ukraine.
President Vladimir Putin removed Poklonskaya from her post as the deputy head of Rossotrudnichestvo, Russia’s federal agency for international outreach, on Monday.
The 42-year-old took up the role in February 2022, after declining to run for a second term as a deputy for the ruling United Russia party in Russia’s lower house of parliament.
The former lawmaker spoke out against Moscow’s invasion of her native Ukraine, calling it a “catastrophe.”
“People are dying, houses and entire cities are destroyed [leaving] millions of refugees. Bodies and souls are mutilated. My heart is bursting with pain.”
“My two native countries are killing each other, that’s not what I wanted and it’s not what I want,” she said in a video address to an international forum in April.
She later criticized the spread of Russia’s pro-war Z symbol, which has been prominently displayed on buildings and merchandise to symbolize the public’s support for Russian troops in Ukraine.
Her comments sparked outrage from other officials, including her boss, Rossotrudnichestvo chief Yevgeny Primakov. He claimed that the letter Z was a symbol of the “liberation of Ukraine from the obvious evil of terrorists and bandits.”
Not at all. I believe that a wannabe empire builder and bully like Putin should not be allowed to impose his will on an otherwise free people in Ukraine and commit cultural genocide against the Ukrainian people/language.
The vast majority of people agree with me. The few who do not are probably all doing so for ulterior motives, and they themselves would agree that wars of aggression are bad in principle, but they happen to hate America or the West or something so they see Putin as the lesser evil.
No need for anyone enlisting, Ukrainian forces don't need men but only more Western training. For example a contingent of 10,000 have just finished their UK training yesterday, but it could go on so much faster rate.
It's so strange how no one of those so concerned about the prospect nuclear war won't go protest the Russian embassy against their nuclear threats.
What you see is not real. It never happened. It is nowhere to be found when you search for it with Google. It is not anywhere on YouTube. It did not air on any of the news networks.
The people love our dear leaders, specially AOC.
The people stand with Ukraine and support the continued financing of this war.
Two words: Watch network news and vote democrat or MAGA wins.
Come on, man!
All of America's bloodiest wars have been started by progressive socialists.
It's kinda funny how Republicans got all the bad rep for starting wars.
Republicans started the bloodiest war on American soil.
Worse yet, they abolished slavery! Fuckers! As a staunch Democrat, I am still angry about that!
Technically true
And I’m sure the area will still vote before her
AOC deserves whatever shit gets thrown at her.
But essentially every Republican save Rand Paul is in full support of this money laundering scheme as well.
Watch as these dumb fucks vote for her again.
Not that I disagree with what they said, but both of them mentioning Tulsi Gabbard tells me that this is not organic and these guys are following marching orders.
AoC's fanclub would never mention Tulsi Gabbard as an example of anything except a DINO, as they have done for years. They'd never use her as an example of someone doing the right thing.
Something stinks.
Interesting. They are definitely plants (Tulsi? Really? Yes I saw the 'announcement' yesterday) -- but how much overlap is there really between AOC simps and Tulsi simps?
This is the beginning of the Great Schism in the Democrat party. If the GOP crushes november, which I feel is increasingly likely, the fragile alliance of the dems is toast.
The progressives are going to try to push the party dinosaurs over the cliff into oblivion, but they forget all the money is with the neolib/neocon establishment. The real money in Washington would rather pay for senile and corrupt Feinstein to dodder around with a rubber stamp than to give a red cent to the people who celebrated CHOP in Seattle.
This is going to get really ugly, I just hope the republicans can use it to their advantage. I unfortunately suspect, however, that the neocons are going to get involved (uniparty gonna uniparty)
OP is unironic handshake bot spamming the site lmao.
The only "vote to start this war in Ukraine" was in the Duma and the Federation Council (all for).
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2022/02/22/russian-mps-greenlight-putins-recognition-of-rebel-ukrainian-regions-a76514
He’s probably talking about the 100s of billions we’ve sent there, because obviously “we” aren’t sending “troops”
The total of 17 (seventeen) billion, which is a tiny part of America's annual defense budget (722 billion for 2022).
That's hilarious how so little demolished Russia's "superpower" army that actually believed they would could steamrolled all of NATO.
This is by far the most cost-effective American large scale military investment of all time. Ridicalously so. So much that you (plural as you got upvotes without being corrected) thought it must have been "hundreds of billions" involved.
To compare, Vietnam cost America 1 trillion in today's dollars, Iraq about 2 trillion, and the F-35 program maybe even more. (Also they just sentenced Alex Jones to pay 1 billion.)
That’s purely in aid though, how much has america spent on the conflict itself? Clearly they’re running a massive advertising/influencing campaign on top of the aid, and chances are they’re providing constant sat/intel feeds for the uke’s, neither of which are free.
All I’m saying is, this “conflict” is far from one-sided
The sattelites have been up in the space already, the air recon (https://youtube.com/watch?v=zt5j2mrXLks) is just few planes flying in turns.
And, to be honest, the most important issue was this: https://youtube.com/watch?v=i9i47sgi-V4
Don't forget the CIA and Special Forces spooks over there doing their thing.
Just like Vietnam, we fight a "proxy war" then send in the Marines once our puppet regime begins to lose.
Nothing to forget when it's only in your mind, and South Vietnam was always losing (ridicalous battles of even the "elite" forces like the VN Rangers with American air support being massacred in their hundreds by the outnumbered and of course outgunned VC). It's pretty hard to find an early battle that wasn't a VC victory. There was never any period during 1961-65 (the "pre-Marines" American involvement) when Saigon was winning, reversing the ever increasing communist gains. "Even" the Strategic Hamlet Program was hugely counterproductive, and so was the 1963 coup.
South Vietnamese started getting their shit together only later, with one of their greatest moments ironically during the final collapse (and while left all alone):
Do you mean to say here the US does NOT have CIA and Special Forces people in Ukraine?
Do you actually think they do "hundreds or billions" worth things there secretly?
Americans military trainers of and liaisons to the Ukrainians operate openly in Poland. (They're being joined by British, Canadians, French, and so on.)
And all of the American military activities in Poland are financed from the 17 billion budget too.
Also the EU pulled 17 billion Euro specifically for the refugees, military assistance aside.
OP is a brand new account made to post this. Likely russian agent.
I hope russia paid those shills for their little incoherent meltdowns. It would be extra sad if they got up and screamed about "Ukrainian nazis" for free like jannies. So Putin told all the shills to scream that nuclear war is coming? That's the talking point? LOL yeah bro, nobody actually believes it, though. We've been funding Ukraine for this whole year and no nuclear war yet! So I guess Putin isn't ready to end the world after all! LOL.
Seriously, Russiabots, you're embarrassing yourself almost as bad as the Chinese did over Taiwan.
And before Antonio comes in here and calls me crazy for calling out paid Russian enemy agents, Russia already got caught funding the Black Hammer Party - a black militant cult led by some psycho faggot Gazi Kodzo who killed a kid - to go do Russia's bidding and vomit up Russian state talking points.
That's exactly what it looks like I'm seeing in this video.
And anyways to state the obvious, even if Putin was making serious nuke threats [he isn't], the moment you back down to those threats, you incentivize him to make more nuke threats and escalate them, and assuming you're not willing to let Putin fuck your wife, presumably you'll have to stand up to him eventually, right? Well, after being a bitch to him dozens of times, when you finally say "no", the odds of Putin actually nuking you are astronomically higher than if you said no to him right from the start. That's how the slippery slope works. So your appeasement actually dramatically increases the danger, it does not reduce it. This ought to be common sense, and our elites know this, which is why these silly little propaganda efforts are going to come to nothing.
Mate, the OP might be a Russian shill, fair enough. But you are only making it very clear that you are a shill with ridiculously transparent comments like this. And if you aren't being paid for it, then that's even worse - you're just donating your time to push someone else's talking points.
/u/dekachin is just sperging out with random tl;dr. Actually on subject, https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/15K6JQkegL/x/c/4OezB37bQq9
A few of them later changed their minds, including famously the Crimean meme woman, but not only her. They claimed they were deceived:
And as for the meme girl (paging u/TheImpossible1):
Not at all. I believe that a wannabe empire builder and bully like Putin should not be allowed to impose his will on an otherwise free people in Ukraine and commit cultural genocide against the Ukrainian people/language.
The vast majority of people agree with me. The few who do not are probably all doing so for ulterior motives, and they themselves would agree that wars of aggression are bad in principle, but they happen to hate America or the West or something so they see Putin as the lesser evil.
Definitely someone's agent, but defaulting to Russia as the source ignores other options.
Do you know what Putin has in common with Tulsi Gabbard?
They're both WEF shills.
No need for anyone enlisting, Ukrainian forces don't need men but only more Western training. For example a contingent of 10,000 have just finished their UK training yesterday, but it could go on so much faster rate.
It's so strange how no one of those so concerned about the prospect nuclear war won't go protest the Russian embassy against their nuclear threats.
I don't know why you're being downvoted, a bunch of individual handshake accounts posted this exact post on multiple communities. Shameful.
The bots and shills are flexing how many accounts they have here.
a 10 to 1 ratio of rational people vs bots/shills, about what I expected.