Blowing up the Crimean Bridge was a clear military infrastructure target. It was perfectly valid for Ukraine to target it, and is not "terrorist" just because they used a truck bomb to blow it up while Russia uses expensive missiles to blow up Ukrainian bridges. Russia has targeted and blown up a number of UKR bridges throughout the war, including bridges far from any combat area, such as the Zatoka bridge near Romania. Turn about is fair play.
Paul Massaro isn't Ukrainian nor does he speak for the UKR government. He is a US government bureaucrat, and seems to be an idiot who only graduated from school in 2015 yet describes himself as a "foremost expert" and is deeply embedded in the libtard establishment. Stop misusing the "it cries out in pain as it strikes you" meme, that doesn't even apply here.
Russia firing missiles at cities in revenge for UKR blowing up a bridge is some petty, childish shit. It is also not a response in kind. UKR wasn't indiscriminately lobbing missiles at Russian cities. A like for like response would be to target infrastructure, not civilians. All this action does is show the Russians to be the scummy, evil little bullies they are.
You losers are backing the wrong side, your boy is losing, and the empire you cling to is in its death throes. Russia is and will forever be broken as a "power" of any kind, having lost to Ukraine. The only question now is how many more Russian men need to die, and how much more Russian equipment needs to be destroyed, until the Russians finally accept reality and admit defeat.
Personally, I'm hoping the Russians stick it out and keep fighting. I want to see them crushed and their military capacity destroyed utterly so they can serve as an example to tinpot dictators everywhere.
Downvotes will not better Russia's military fortunes, but I'm sure you'll do your part!
I doubt he'll use nukes unless the US/Europe directly threatens him. Not just because they're "losing" in Ukraine. In that case they would just claim victory over some small success and go home.
It’s the west that would back Ukraine that has said nukes (and I absolutely believe that the West would nuke Russia if it nuked Ukraine, if only because that’s a lot of corruption dollars they no longer get access to because Russia glassed it).
Blowing up the Crimean Bridge was a clear military infrastructure target. It was perfectly valid for Ukraine to target it, and is not "terrorist" just because they used a truck bomb to blow it up while Russia uses expensive missiles to blow up Ukrainian bridges. Russia has targeted and blown up a number of UKR bridges throughout the war, including bridges far from any combat area, such as the Zatoka bridge near Romania. Turn about is fair play.
Paul Massaro isn't Ukrainian nor does he speak for the UKR government. He is a US government bureaucrat, and seems to be an idiot who only graduated from school in 2015 yet describes himself as a "foremost expert" and is deeply embedded in the libtard establishment. Stop misusing the "it cries out in pain as it strikes you" meme, that doesn't even apply here.
Russia firing missiles at cities in revenge for UKR blowing up a bridge is some petty, childish shit. It is also not a response in kind. UKR wasn't indiscriminately lobbing missiles at Russian cities. A like for like response would be to target infrastructure, not civilians. All this action does is show the Russians to be the scummy, evil little bullies they are.
You losers are backing the wrong side, your boy is losing, and the empire you cling to is in its death throes. Russia is and will forever be broken as a "power" of any kind, having lost to Ukraine. The only question now is how many more Russian men need to die, and how much more Russian equipment needs to be destroyed, until the Russians finally accept reality and admit defeat.
Personally, I'm hoping the Russians stick it out and keep fighting. I want to see them crushed and their military capacity destroyed utterly so they can serve as an example to tinpot dictators everywhere.
Downvotes will not better Russia's military fortunes, but I'm sure you'll do your part!
Russia lost?? You should tell Ukraine so they can all go home!
I used the word "losing" not "lost". I get that English isn't your 1st language, comrade, but please learn how tenses work in the English language before replying, thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_verbs#Present_participle
Oh yeah?
Yeah, stupid, will forever be is future tense.
Not even Russian or anything but you're a retarded redditor
Your arguments are about as effective as the Russian defense of Lyman.
It's non an argument. I'm insulting you retard.
I pray I get to use this line some day.
The fact that you respond to my arguments with insults means:
I'm right
you're triggered
you're an asshole
you're blocked
fucking autist
You're a braindead Putin bootlicker.
You're a coping mutt
Ya much better to back those currently freezing their own people out.
Nobody is freezing. That's a cope the Russiabots tell themselves.
Odd conjecture considering Putin is sitting on a massive stockpile of nukes, really think he’ll go down without using them?
I doubt he'll use nukes unless the US/Europe directly threatens him. Not just because they're "losing" in Ukraine. In that case they would just claim victory over some small success and go home.
Not OP but absolutely, as using nukes means he gets nuked back, means the whole world gets turned into a wasteland while he dies having lost.
What nukes does Ukraine have?
It’s the west that would back Ukraine that has said nukes (and I absolutely believe that the West would nuke Russia if it nuked Ukraine, if only because that’s a lot of corruption dollars they no longer get access to because Russia glassed it).