Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

35
FoX NeWs IS CoNSeRvaTiVe (media.communities.win)
posted 3 years ago by Ahaus667 3 years ago by Ahaus667 +35 / -0
40 comments download share
40 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (40)
sorted by:
▲ 34 ▼
– Telia 34 points 3 years ago +34 / -0

they should not be allowed to do gender transition with or without the parents consent. No one should be allowed to . Child or adult.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 26 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 26 points 3 years ago +26 / -0

If doctors are not allowed to chop off your arms if you 'feel' transabled, why should they be allowed to chop off your dick or breasts if you 'feel' another gender? Adult or not. It doesn't make much sense, in fact, it doesn't make any sense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Assassin47 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

Because SCIENCE.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 20 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0

The fact this is even a discussion shows how pedophilia has won year after year

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Kaarous 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

Additionally, crossdressing with the intent to deceive should be outlawed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

No, see if you pretend to be a woman you deserve the same insane standards that women have. To quote a post I made earlier

According to Anderson, Weinberg then brought her to his bedroom and performed oral sex on Anderson to give her genitals what he called a “glistening effect” for the photos. She says she told him then — and throughout the encounter — that she was asexual. In order to deflect Weinberg’s repeated suggestions of anal sex, she says, she performed oral sex on him. At the conclusion of the alleged assault, she remembers Weinberg standing between her and the door as she dressed, thanking her for coming over and telling her another woman was on her way over for a shoot. “You’re not going to go to the police and tell everybody I raped you, right?” she says Weinberg asked. She assured him she wouldn’t. It took her three days to muster the courage — three days of not bathing to preserve the dried semen on her body — before she went to the police and submitted to a rape kit examination. According to the police report, “Avian A. did not stop Weinberg at any time or state that she did not want him to touch or digitally penetrate her because she was afraid that he would become aggressive or stop her from leaving. She believed that if she allowed him to do what he wanted and stayed cordial with him, he would not become aggressive.” When she returned home and took a bath, seeing her nude body for the first time since the shoot, she vomited.

Men= Perpetrator regardless

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– almond_activator 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

By the media's account of her retelling, the man would have needed to be a literal mind-reader to know she wasn't a willing participant.

Holy Lord, how do you discern between a woman who feigns enthusiasm because she's "scared you'll become aggressive" and a woman who feigns enthusiasm because she hopes you'll stuff her good? Never mind the possibility of genuine enthusiasm because she's into you...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

And it should be a capital offense with vigilantism specifically legalized.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

Tucker's good and the rest is not.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

This is the same clinging factor every human faces with a corrupt service. Is the one worth the rest?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

Tucker is the one media figure who speaks the truth. He's worth a world of foxes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– almond_activator 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

If you told me that one railroad track was empty, and another had one of my friends and all of my enemies tied to it, I'd be coming back to that lever, day after day, staring at it to try to make sense of my decision.

This is basically the universal suffrage problem: are some women based? Yes. Would we all be better off if no women could vote? Yes. Is it moral to deny them the vote on pragmatic grounds alone?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

If you told me that one railroad track was empty, and another had one of my friends and all of my enemies tied to it, I'd be coming back to that lever, day after day, staring at it to try to make sense of my decision.

I'd say: one has only enemies, the other has enemies and one extremely influential, good friend. I know which I would pick.

Now I know a lot of people spin tales about what will happen. E.g. that suddenly a network with only Tuckers would rise if Fox were burned down by them. That is just fanciful.

This is basically the universal suffrage problem: are some women based? Yes. Would we all be better off if no women could vote? Yes. Is it moral to deny them the vote on pragmatic grounds alone?

Considering morality is a luxury that cannot be afforded. It's difficult enough to defeat the menace while only considering expediency. I'd argue that it's bad on pragmatic grounds, and pragmatic grounds alone - at least, announcing it beforehand (because that immediately alienates most women).

If it is true that women voting are to blame for the degeneration of Western civilization, it still does not follow that them not voting will solve the issue. Because in the meantime, everyone has gone to hell.

The bigger problem is that 'voting' doesn't seem to change anything. You get the same thing no matter who you 'vote' for.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– Assassin47 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Show me one good man, and I'll spare this city.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Sodom and Gomorrah beg to differ

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Assassin47 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Well I may have butchered the quote but you get the point. Let's get Tucker the hell out of there before Fox News is turned into salt.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– almond_activator 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

One good man was worth saving, but two would have been worth saving the city for.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– AccountWasFree 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

Most conservatives aren't "Conservative". They have decades of compromise under their belt and nary an example of conserving anything.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Gay marriage, sexual reproduction is the same as sodomy, the sexual “revolution” etc. “conservatives” have failed on every front to appease modern conveniences over biological demands

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– novanleon 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

The conservative people -- not to be mistaken for so-called "conservative" Republicans -- opposed all of these things.

  • Gay marriage was passed by a Democrat-controlled Supreme Court and overrode the laws in many states that banned gay marriage (speaking of being "anti-democratic"). Unfortunately, the so called "conservative" Republicans thought this was a losing electoral issue so they didn't take a strong stand against the ruling. Most Republicans care more about their own elections than anything else, and could care less about conservative principles unless they think it will benefit them in some way.

  • The sexual revolution was opposed by conservatives at every turn, but young people think sex is exciting and fun and don't understand long-term consequences, so when they're constantly indoctrinated by the culture to engage in sexual hedonism, there's only so much conservatives can do. Even good parents often temporarily lose their kids to the culture once they enter high-school or college.

The problem is there are very few true conservatives in the Republican Party, and this has pretty much always been the case. Most politicians are unprincipled opportunists, and Republicans are no exception.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Gizortnik 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Two Virginia mothers weigh in... which is why Fox News can officially declare the state of Arizona for Joe Biden in the 2024 General Election.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

People that aren’t legally allowed to vote or own guns are entirely capable of deciding their gender

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

The best they could argue under 2A is 16

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Indianslost3-1lead 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Brb off to buy my niece a piece before she turns 10

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– bloodguard 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Fox news has been trash for a few years now. Stop giving them views.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Which is why I archive everything or use pics

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MattTheBlack 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I've never watched them. They're annoying shits with barely right wing takes

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– I_Bent_My_Wookiee 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Because if your "feeeeeeeeeeeeeeelings" are out of synch with biological reality, then the obvious solution is chopping off those body parts. LOGICS! <derp>

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– LastRights 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Factions within FoxNews were basically campaigning against Trump during the elections. That interview with what's his name who went over to CNN+ comes to mind. Pretty sure FoxNews was haemorrhaging viewers after the results of the 2020 elections came in and they started peddling the January 6 garbage. They also gave a show to that transexual Kardashian reject.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Factions of the Republican party were campaigning against Trump. I'm not surprised they exist at Fox News, too.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

Like when Fox News said the mother who castrated their child was correct because she knew her child wanted to transition since childhood

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– almond_activator 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

What is the balance point between good and intolerable evil?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy