The goal of building the "renewable" infrastructure is so that the few remaining technocrat families can live in a modern technological society without needing to rely on the "dirty peasants" who are necessary to pull from the earth those resources on which civilization relies.
The pretext is "saving the planet". But the true plan is to centralize the "peasant" population into AI and drone managed "cities" really concentration camps that pretend they aren't. Then reduce that population through attrition, helped along by "vaccines", bug diets, denying sunlight, and induced mental illness.
Keep just enough alive so that there is a ready supply of pretty young girls and useful or entertaining autists to keep the Eloi utopia from stagnating.
Bezo's plan to have most of the human population living and working in space is probably really going to shoot people into the sun. Then you'll get AI-generated "wish you were here" postcards from your family members living in space who strangely never get permission to come back to Earth. By the time everyone has woken up it will be too late.
^^^ I forget which journo tweeted it but a few years ago there was an article about Nuclear's positive effects on environment and he said that wasn't good enough because it didn't address " racism and colonialism's effects" on something or rather.
Look up Siberian Trap and Deccan Trap.. lava flow events where it covered millions of cubic km for 2 million years. earth will be fine with us spewing out CO2 for barely 100 years lol. probably fine with us spewing out CO2 for hundreds of thousands of years.
Earth will be fine no matter what we do collectively--even nuclear holocaust. Human beings, on the other hand, are in danger of becoming extinct, but not before being degraded by wealthy and powerful eco-fascists and their dupes.
The latest environmentalists are anti-human. This is reflected in the WEF's agenda.
Since the advent of ecology in the late 1960s there has been a growing contingent of leftists who see Homosap as a sort of infestation, or as a parasite of a benign host.
The global warming lie will not die, just like the overpopulation lie hasn't, because it satisfies the twisted psychological state of radical (and not so radical) "environmentalists."
California bans sales of non EV vehicles by 2035, California tells EV owners not to charge their cars between certain hours of the day, California schedules shut down of its last remaining nuclear power plant in 2024, removing 17M MWhs a year from its grid.
Such is the fate of the rest of the US if the commies remain in charge.
yeah, though I think the whole "ban by 2035" is never going to happen in practice since it's just typical aspirational bullshit from libtards, and then when the date comes, libs will scream BUT WHADDABOUT DA POOR and libtards will declare mission accomplished on the environment and let the poors keep using gas.
the proposal is banning new gas powered car sales by 2035. The poors will have to make due with used gas cars still available. I think its going to go through, maybe pushed back a few more years as 2035 gets closer and it becomes more clear that still only ~4% of the population drives EVs. I also think they wont ban outside the state sales of new gas powered cars but tax the crap out of them when brought into CA.
Save the planet from assholes who want to reduce us to preindustrial troglodytes.
The hubris of the Greta Thunbergs of this world is driving us to destruction in the name of some fucking godless act of contrition.
We are witnessing the planned destruction of millions via poverty and starvation so a core of elite billionaires and their personal slaves can have more room for themselves.
That is a screenshot and not ms paint and does have the source in it.
Now for the source of the source I've not checked but here is the link for that graph:
China has been a thresher maw of human suffering for all of recorded history. As technology has advanced, their means, methods, and efficiency of depriving the population of rights and dignity has progressed, and that is it.
There's literally the website name and subject title in the image. You could type that all into Google in less characters than it took you to pointlessly bitch about it.
That shit can and will be changed surreptitiously you colossal fool. Archive your shit or don't post it. Screenshots can be doctored. Articles can be edited after the fact to say something completely different.
It took more effort to clip out the screenshot and post that than it does to just copy/paste the URL into archive.is and link that directly. But it's not about conveying data and documenting what's happening in the world is it? It's about posting an image, because that's what gets the precious upvotes because everyone's a goddamn junkie.
Taking China's population into account, their CO2 output is still lower than the US. Also, they do use EV's. Lots of them, very small, very light vehicles for small journeys around the local area.
America has problem in that much of it has been planned around the car, endless cheap fuel, and hundred mile daily commutes.
Policies take place on a nation-state level. I think most people are fine with anyone using EVs or lowering their personal carbon output if they want to. But no environmental policy the federal government encourages or regulates here will have any affect on the planet because there's so many people in China.
Taking China's population into account, their CO2 output is still lower than the US.
By that logic, the United States can invade and annex some poorshit countries with super low CO2 per capita and then use those populations to dilute our stats and declare our per capita numbers to be super low.
China is 2 countries. One is a highly developed industrial country roughly on the level of Taiwan, the other is poorshit villagers in mud huts.
You can't excuse 1 because it gets diluted by 2.
they do use EV's.
Still an insignificant fraction of their total number of vehicles.
America has problem in that much of it has been planned around the car, endless cheap fuel, and hundred mile daily commutes.
not a problem, commie
very few people do long commutes as a percentage of the population. US average commute time is 27.6 minutes. This is actually artificially high because using public transport - which is included, drives up the times. workers who traveled to work by bus had an average commute of 46.6 minutes. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2021/one-way-travel-time-to-work-rises.html
Nothing more than personal anecdote, but I've seen pics of where I live in the 50s-70s and can compare it to today.
Land use change probably has a lot to do with it, as there are a lot less sheep eating everything now, but the extreme change of going from shrubland with a few houses and no trees 50+ years ago, to hundreds of houses but you can barely see them because it's all overgrown with trees. Not just planted in people's yards, but growing wild in between properties.
The goal of building the "renewable" infrastructure is so that the few remaining technocrat families can live in a modern technological society without needing to rely on the "dirty peasants" who are necessary to pull from the earth those resources on which civilization relies.
The pretext is "saving the planet". But the true plan is to centralize the "peasant" population into AI and drone managed "cities" really concentration camps that pretend they aren't. Then reduce that population through attrition, helped along by "vaccines", bug diets, denying sunlight, and induced mental illness.
Keep just enough alive so that there is a ready supply of pretty young girls and useful or entertaining autists to keep the Eloi utopia from stagnating.
Bezo's plan to have most of the human population living and working in space is probably really going to shoot people into the sun. Then you'll get AI-generated "wish you were here" postcards from your family members living in space who strangely never get permission to come back to Earth. By the time everyone has woken up it will be too late.
That makes for a very interesting dark sci Fi.
You would never know that our CO2 admissions peaked a decade ago if these con artists were the only information on the subject.
^^^ I forget which journo tweeted it but a few years ago there was an article about Nuclear's positive effects on environment and he said that wasn't good enough because it didn't address " racism and colonialism's effects" on something or rather.
The left doesn't even like Tesla now because Musk said some rational things
Look up Siberian Trap and Deccan Trap.. lava flow events where it covered millions of cubic km for 2 million years. earth will be fine with us spewing out CO2 for barely 100 years lol. probably fine with us spewing out CO2 for hundreds of thousands of years.
Earth will be fine no matter what we do collectively--even nuclear holocaust. Human beings, on the other hand, are in danger of becoming extinct, but not before being degraded by wealthy and powerful eco-fascists and their dupes.
The latest environmentalists are anti-human. This is reflected in the WEF's agenda.
Since the advent of ecology in the late 1960s there has been a growing contingent of leftists who see Homosap as a sort of infestation, or as a parasite of a benign host.
The global warming lie will not die, just like the overpopulation lie hasn't, because it satisfies the twisted psychological state of radical (and not so radical) "environmentalists."
California bans sales of non EV vehicles by 2035, California tells EV owners not to charge their cars between certain hours of the day, California schedules shut down of its last remaining nuclear power plant in 2024, removing 17M MWhs a year from its grid.
Such is the fate of the rest of the US if the commies remain in charge.
yeah, though I think the whole "ban by 2035" is never going to happen in practice since it's just typical aspirational bullshit from libtards, and then when the date comes, libs will scream BUT WHADDABOUT DA POOR and libtards will declare mission accomplished on the environment and let the poors keep using gas.
the proposal is banning new gas powered car sales by 2035. The poors will have to make due with used gas cars still available. I think its going to go through, maybe pushed back a few more years as 2035 gets closer and it becomes more clear that still only ~4% of the population drives EVs. I also think they wont ban outside the state sales of new gas powered cars but tax the crap out of them when brought into CA.
And all of reddit/ big tech will blame Putin for all this…
Save the planet from assholes who want to reduce us to preindustrial troglodytes.
The hubris of the Greta Thunbergs of this world is driving us to destruction in the name of some fucking godless act of contrition.
We are witnessing the planned destruction of millions via poverty and starvation so a core of elite billionaires and their personal slaves can have more room for themselves.
PS/Edit
Alex Jones is right!
"environmentalists" are fundamentally anti-human
Co2 ain't the thing we should be worried about in regards to china, and I am effectively talking about BOTH the government and pollution.
Need a source beyond your work in MS Paint.
That is a screenshot and not ms paint and does have the source in it. Now for the source of the source I've not checked but here is the link for that graph:
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co2-emissions-per-country
I'm surprised about India, I would expect it to be way higher.
No. No, I don't.
China has been a thresher maw of human suffering for all of recorded history. As technology has advanced, their means, methods, and efficiency of depriving the population of rights and dignity has progressed, and that is it.
i'd be fine with china being a sheet of glass
Nothing to say now? Weird. At least have the spine to admit you're a tard.
What the fuck are you on about faggot?
There's literally the website name and subject title in the image. You could type that all into Google in less characters than it took you to pointlessly bitch about it.
That shit can and will be changed surreptitiously you colossal fool. Archive your shit or don't post it. Screenshots can be doctored. Articles can be edited after the fact to say something completely different.
It took more effort to clip out the screenshot and post that than it does to just copy/paste the URL into archive.is and link that directly. But it's not about conveying data and documenting what's happening in the world is it? It's about posting an image, because that's what gets the precious upvotes because everyone's a goddamn junkie.
If you want an archive? Get off your ass and post it yourself. All the tools were right there for you.
I guarantee that leading by example is going to make more people change their behaviors than being a smug, passive aggressive, bitch about it.
That doesn't even look like MS paint on the face of it lol....
Please don't make me explain the jest.
Not to be a commie-lover, but...
Taking China's population into account, their CO2 output is still lower than the US. Also, they do use EV's. Lots of them, very small, very light vehicles for small journeys around the local area.
America has problem in that much of it has been planned around the car, endless cheap fuel, and hundred mile daily commutes.
Policies take place on a nation-state level. I think most people are fine with anyone using EVs or lowering their personal carbon output if they want to. But no environmental policy the federal government encourages or regulates here will have any affect on the planet because there's so many people in China.
By that logic, the United States can invade and annex some poorshit countries with super low CO2 per capita and then use those populations to dilute our stats and declare our per capita numbers to be super low.
China is 2 countries. One is a highly developed industrial country roughly on the level of Taiwan, the other is poorshit villagers in mud huts.
You can't excuse 1 because it gets diluted by 2.
Still an insignificant fraction of their total number of vehicles.
not a problem, commie
very few people do long commutes as a percentage of the population. US average commute time is 27.6 minutes. This is actually artificially high because using public transport - which is included, drives up the times. workers who traveled to work by bus had an average commute of 46.6 minutes. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2021/one-way-travel-time-to-work-rises.html
Annexing poorshit countries built most of the mid-tier economies of today's world. It needs to come back into fashion.
very true: https://wattsupwiththat.com/category/global-greening/
Nothing more than personal anecdote, but I've seen pics of where I live in the 50s-70s and can compare it to today.
Land use change probably has a lot to do with it, as there are a lot less sheep eating everything now, but the extreme change of going from shrubland with a few houses and no trees 50+ years ago, to hundreds of houses but you can barely see them because it's all overgrown with trees. Not just planted in people's yards, but growing wild in between properties.