Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

50
The Wahman Kang (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 3 years ago by Ahaus667 3 years ago by Ahaus667 +50 / -0
26 comments download share
26 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (26)
sorted by:
▲ 30 ▼
– MrPim 30 points 3 years ago +30 / -0

Let's not forget that these wise, peaceful natives were protecting their slave trade. Truly a heartbreaking tale of White Supremacy.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 26 ▼
– AnotherSchwarzesMark 26 points 3 years ago +26 / -0

I love the "the French lost 6 soldiers" part at the end. Probably friendly fire, they were French after all, lol.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Grumman 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

The French don't deserve that remark. Taking a single casualty for every hundred they inflicted in shock combat is a combat record to be proud of.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Six_z3r0 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Agreed. Every now and again the frogs do something worth a thumbs up.

Nearly all those deaths being inflicted by bayonets.

Hard core.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

The reputation of French as surrender monkeys or somehow incompetent in combat is fairly recent. Before that it was all Napoleon and Foreign Legion. Probably, the tough guys died in WW1.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– GimmeFuelGimmeFire 22 points 3 years ago +22 / -0

LMAO 417 - 6

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– RoulerBleu 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

Almost as bad as women's soccer Olympic teams VS male teenagers.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– Wizardslayer 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0

Are they going to include the part where they had annual human sacrifices of slaves?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– deleted 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Just the ones not suitable to sell, or for which there was no buyer.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– elleand202 18 points 3 years ago +18 / -0

At least its original programming and not a race/gender swap skinsuit like it usually goes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 31 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 31 points 3 years ago +31 / -0

The wahmen being as strong as men is just as bad

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 30 ▼
– Indipendepede 30 points 3 years ago +30 / -0

decisively crushed

Yeah, I don't think it's going to be a historically accurate portrayal. At best, some "artistic license" will be involved where the King of Wahmenz will be slaughtering the French legionaries until she is overwhelmed by their numbers (despite the opposite being true and they still lost).

I bet a shit tonne more than 6 French soldiers will be lost during any big battle scene, and that's just her personal kill count. Not to mention her superior close-combat skills despite most of the deaths occurring by bayonet

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– YouAreAPirate 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

I think I saw some people theorising it could be a 300-style movie. I could see it kind of working in that regard, but unless the movie covers several battles, the kill count is going to be vastly over-inflated, especially against the French.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– Steampunk_Moustache 18 points 3 years ago +18 / -0

Against a military unit with decidedly superior weaponry and a longer bayonet, the Dahomey Amazons could not prevail

Hmmm....

Wiped out in hand-to-hand combat

nearly all of those deaths being inflicted by bayonets

Hmm, yes, must be the 'superior weaponry' and 'longer bayonets'.

Totally not because trained women were pitted against trained men instead of their usual targets of farmers asleep in their beds.

The dahomey lost 86 regulars and 417 Dahomey Amazons

Anyone wanna guess the sex of the regulars?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 15 ▼
– SomeHands10 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

Assuming the article is accurate, this shows how ridiculous the notion that a tribe/community only needs a few men to survive because the women are the reproductive bottleneck (this notion is used by many including many non-feminist men to justify male disposability and justify gynocentrism). Such a tribe gets wiped out by a tribe with more men. Reproduction is far from the only matter of importance when it comes to human communities. In almost any matter apart from reproduction, men are more valuable than women, so when it comes to survival in competition with other communities, a tribe allowing their men to mostly die out is a disaster that usually leads to extinction.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Grumman 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

The reproductive bottleneck is never going to be the rate at which a woman is physically capable of producing children anyway, unless the sex ratio is skewed in favour of the men. Because it's not the two year turnaround from conception to weaning that is the limiting factor, it's your capacity to support and train the child until they are old enough to do more work than they create.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– NataliePortmanteau 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

This isn't a Brave New World-esque trend at all, warping history and facts in Feelies into nonsense pomo mash that further obscures and confuses history, placing bizarre over-exaggerated emphasis on obscure historical points and magnifying them as if they were significant and not outliers whose history was quickly snuffed out.

There have been all sorts of social arrangements in history, for example. Why not make a movie about the isle of Lesbos? Or the Shakers? Oh, they would be white and religious, that's why.

I can't bring myself to even look closer at this shit. Could you imagine what dysgenic freaks these Amazons must have been? How ugly and gross and like-men they were?

I bet they'll depict their stupid "civilization" like it was Athens and Wakanda (bc sub-Saharan Africa never had an advanced, coherent civilization before evil Whitey came along). They were likely brutal savages that killed and ate their enemies and lived in lean-tos on the ground.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– TyroneNiggums 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

WE WUZ WOMAN KANGZ!!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

n sheeit

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Royalalbatross 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Best comment under the trailer:**

I see a lot of people defending this saying "who cares if the Dahomeys enslaved people, they did other things too. People don't feel offended when it's not a movie about Romans that doesnt shows slavery or crucification"

Dude, this entire war was about slavery. Because the Dahomeys entire culture existed based on slavery, because their entire existence was about raiding other African cities and enslaving people. This is why the French decided to step in and fight a war to put an end to their empire in the first place. And a large portion of the French forces were also Africans who were tired of Dahomey's shit. (like the Senegalese Tirailleurs. They should had just made a movie about them, and it would be a cool movie about black soldiers putting the final nail in the coffin of the last great enslaver empire in the world. THEY are the ones that deserves a movie about them, not their enslavers) By the time this war takes place (1892), slavery already had been banned in the entire western world.(Brazil was the last country to abolish slavery, in 1888).

If you still don't understand how bad the concept of this movie is, then try to imagine a World War Two movie where the Germans are invaded by the French, who have concentration camps to exterminate Germans in Paris, and then say it's "based on a powerful true story". This is what this movie looks like. It's disgusting. Every single person involved with the production of this movie should feel ashamed.

Spoilers: It's going to be difficulty for the her to become a "woman king" because when the city was captured, the coward king tried to set the whole city on fire and then ran away. Let's say there was not much more of a kingdom to govern after the war.**

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Brennus 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

In English we have a term for “woman king” it’s called Queen.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– NataliePortmanteau 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dahomey_Amazons

Pretty based. Dahomey Regular army were shit and all died in combat so the KING drafted women into service. Some as young as 8.

The kingdom was super-garbage and the only way the king could possibly keep any women left alive was to let them enter the Grand Council.

Which within 20 year's time crashed.

Soundly defeated by the French, the remaining "warrior" women found readjustment to social norms difficult, if not impossible. It was a wave of old maids sweeping the streets and Spinning yarn.

So....your heroes are literally women pressed into service by men after all the men died, kept opposing armies from killing women until they no longer have a shit and massacre them, with the remaining "army" broken husks for the rest of their lives with no actual significance?

Yikes. That's a reach for "protagonists" in a "pro- black and female" movie or whatever the fuck this shit is supposed to be. Lesbian self-hate? Who knows or cares at this point. I can't believe the femmes are picking subjugated losers as role models now.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– alucard13mmfmj 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

They gonna make wonderwoman black, eh? And lets be honest... an all woman force is probably the kings harem.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy