Only one of the two is actually silencing dissent.
The other one is weaponized as a mascot in order to prevent criticism of people the Democrats like (Soros), while allowing free criticism of people they do like (Adelson).
Only one of the two is actually silencing dissent.
Oh come on. My entire life, it's been perfectly acceptable for anybody to blame white people and Christians for just about every social ill under the sun. But if someone suggests that maybe Jews are responsible for some social ills themselves, they're immediately Hitler.
It's perfectly acceptable to acknowledge that Jews are disproportionately very wealthy (if it's an exercise in singing the praises of Jewish contributions the world), and it's perfectly acceptable to accuse wealthy people of exerting unfair influence on governments, but to suggest that maybe Jews use their disproportionate wealth to influence governments makes you Hitler.
I've got no truck with Jews, personally. I do think there are a lot of really fucking vile racist Jewish individuals out there, and that for some reason nobody tells them to stop being vile racists (probably because to do so means you're Hitler). But the idea that Jews don't enjoy some level of protection from criticism is ludicrous.
Yes, you'll come back with "but the Jews aren't actually the ones that silence the dissent!" and I'll roll my eyes and move on.
Oh come on. My entire life, it's been perfectly acceptable for anybody to blame white people and Christians for just about every social ill under the sun. But if someone suggests that maybe Jews are responsible for some social ills themselves, they're immediately Hitler.
Same thing with feminism. You can blame men for any problem you want and nobody bats an eye, but a woman? Fat chance. Which is kind of what OP was talking about.
I've got no truck with Jews, personally.
Neither do I. It is kind of odd however, that you aren't allowed to question whether or not the Holocaust happened in many countries. It's literally illegal in Germany. I can't think of any other ethnic group where you aren't allowed to debate the veracity of something they claimed happened to them.
Oh come on. My entire life, it's been perfectly acceptable for anybody to blame white people and Christians for just about every social ill under the sun. But if someone suggests that maybe Jews are responsible for some social ills themselves, they're immediately Hitler.
Depends on who does it. If you're a leftist and attack Israel, that's perfectly fine. Hell, you can even put Ivanka Trump on the frontpage of your "paper" and call her a "ghoul" You can also criticize any Jewish donor to GOP causes.
You cannot get in the way of the woke/establishment agenda though.
Besides, compare how criticism of Judaism plays vs. criticism of Islam.
It's perfectly acceptable to acknowledge that Jews are disproportionately very wealthy (if it's an exercise in singing the praises of Jewish contributions the world), and it's perfectly acceptable to accuse wealthy people of exerting unfair influence on governments, but to suggest that maybe Jews use their disproportionate wealth to influence governments makes you Hitler.
Because then your motive is racial. It's like you would not mind people saying that whites are richer than blacks, and that it's bad that wealthy people exercise disproportionate influence, but if you say that "white people use their wealth to influence governments", it sounds like you have a bizarre racial agenda. And people who say that do.
Yes, you'll come back with "but the Jews aren't actually the ones that silence the dissent!" and I'll roll my eyes and move on.
Of course there are. But the only Jews whom you can't criticize are those who are on the left.
I'm starting to think .win is being infected by leftists just like reddit was. It is becoming impossible to enjoy anything without being bombarded with leftist ideology. On reddit leftists blame white people, in here leftists blame the jews. Why do leftists ruin everything they touch?
No, it's just the Jewish Question that has people at odds here.
There's a fine line between A) rational criticisms of the Jews as a political entity or as an insular community at odds with the various nations they inhabit, and B) scapegoating them out of laziness or convenience or bigotry.
I have to give the debate to SR388-SAX here, not because I agree with his point of view entirely but because he's correct about "protection from criticism" and "neoptism."
In multiple countries, they have made illegal to question a historical event without actually providing enough evidence to prove said event actually occured.
Why are people obsessed with Judaism here?
Why are people obsessed with trans people here? Extreme minorities in positions of influence who are militant in silencing dissent.
Only one of the two is actually silencing dissent.
The other one is weaponized as a mascot in order to prevent criticism of people the Democrats like (Soros), while allowing free criticism of people they do like (Adelson).
Oh come on. My entire life, it's been perfectly acceptable for anybody to blame white people and Christians for just about every social ill under the sun. But if someone suggests that maybe Jews are responsible for some social ills themselves, they're immediately Hitler.
It's perfectly acceptable to acknowledge that Jews are disproportionately very wealthy (if it's an exercise in singing the praises of Jewish contributions the world), and it's perfectly acceptable to accuse wealthy people of exerting unfair influence on governments, but to suggest that maybe Jews use their disproportionate wealth to influence governments makes you Hitler.
I've got no truck with Jews, personally. I do think there are a lot of really fucking vile racist Jewish individuals out there, and that for some reason nobody tells them to stop being vile racists (probably because to do so means you're Hitler). But the idea that Jews don't enjoy some level of protection from criticism is ludicrous.
Yes, you'll come back with "but the Jews aren't actually the ones that silence the dissent!" and I'll roll my eyes and move on.
Same thing with feminism. You can blame men for any problem you want and nobody bats an eye, but a woman? Fat chance. Which is kind of what OP was talking about.
Neither do I. It is kind of odd however, that you aren't allowed to question whether or not the Holocaust happened in many countries. It's literally illegal in Germany. I can't think of any other ethnic group where you aren't allowed to debate the veracity of something they claimed happened to them.
Depends on who does it. If you're a leftist and attack Israel, that's perfectly fine. Hell, you can even put Ivanka Trump on the frontpage of your "paper" and call her a "ghoul" You can also criticize any Jewish donor to GOP causes.
You cannot get in the way of the woke/establishment agenda though.
Besides, compare how criticism of Judaism plays vs. criticism of Islam.
Because then your motive is racial. It's like you would not mind people saying that whites are richer than blacks, and that it's bad that wealthy people exercise disproportionate influence, but if you say that "white people use their wealth to influence governments", it sounds like you have a bizarre racial agenda. And people who say that do.
Of course there are. But the only Jews whom you can't criticize are those who are on the left.
Right, because the adl, splc, and aclu haven’t repeatedly worked as the legal thug branch of “minorities”.
But you prove my point, as the only minority they defend is the Democratic Party.
I'm starting to think .win is being infected by leftists just like reddit was. It is becoming impossible to enjoy anything without being bombarded with leftist ideology. On reddit leftists blame white people, in here leftists blame the jews. Why do leftists ruin everything they touch?
No censorship always means you get infested by this ilk, because they have nowhere else to go.
On the sub, we would occasionally give them a slap so they would at least keep their power level private.
No, it's just the Jewish Question that has people at odds here.
There's a fine line between A) rational criticisms of the Jews as a political entity or as an insular community at odds with the various nations they inhabit, and B) scapegoating them out of laziness or convenience or bigotry.
I have to give the debate to SR388-SAX here, not because I agree with his point of view entirely but because he's correct about "protection from criticism" and "neoptism."
Are Jews silencing dissent?
The jewish media does the deeds of the jewish handlers who control our politics.
Including silencing dissent ... by any means necessary.
Ah, I completely forgot about Daily Wire... And PragerU.
In multiple countries, they have made illegal to question a historical event without actually providing enough evidence to prove said event actually occured.
You mean the historical events with overwhelming evidence that it happened and only leftists seems to forget to check said evidence before yapping?
Why did the stormfags get pushed off the internet again?
Because they add nothing to any conversation they're in and because they alienate potential allies, and thus are useless to any movement?
Did you know you can be imprisoned longer than murderers in Europe for questioning the Jewish narrative?