"Based" subreddits are a great example of how censorship benefits right-liberal gatekeepers. On places like reddit, there is always an excuse that hands are being forced by the admins so mods can ban the "undesirables" without looking like they are betraying their free speech stance. That won't work here (for now).
You get "infested by this ilk" because we are correct, and you're all but out of excuses to cover it up when you're in the alt tech gutter like this. We win the debate when we're allowed a seat at the table. Right-liberals know it. Leftists know it. That's why Zizek and Peterson will debate each other but not us.
On places like reddit, there is always an excuse that hands are being forced by the admins so mods can ban the "undesirables" without looking like they are betraying their free speech stance.
Why is that an 'excuse'? Or do you mean that we were happy to be forced to ban people?
You get "infested by this ilk" because we are correct, and you're all but out of excuses to cover it up when you're in the alt tech gutter like this. We win the debate when we're allowed a seat at the table.
You may, but the kind of loser I'm talking about certainly did not. They also did not 'debate'.
That's why Zizek and Peterson will debate each other but not us.
How do you define 'winning a debate'? People generally just declare the person they agree with to be the winner.
In general, yes, right-liberal gatekeepers love to have excuses to punch right and ban people to their right.
Gotta make sure there's a group of people that you can point at and say, "see? Those are the real bad guys that you should hate. We're better than them."
For you personally, I doubt it. In general, yes, right-liberal gatekeepers love to have excuses to punch right and ban people to their right.
That's the kind of person that unfortunately wants to become a moderator to begin with.
The only good moderators I was able to find were the ones who never expressed interest, but whom I asked because they seemed good members of the community.
I was banned from the subreddit a long time ago.
KiA2? Really? Permanently? That is a surprise. Was it a brand new user account?
It's all about the audience.
So it depends on the composition of the audience?
Here, you're beating me when debating the Jews. Anywhere else, I think I would be beating you. If that is the standard.
Get you as a moderator here and slap these leftists into submission. If not, I gladly take the mantle and slap them. DoM is rarely here and these scumbags are taking hold. Every couple of threads there is a leftist mongrel crying about some fake conspiracy theory about Jews.
Speaking of leftists, you're all about using their terminology. "Some fake conspiracy theory". Don't take that CIA-spawned drivel to heart. Conspiracy theories about governments have this strange habit of becoming accepted fact.
No censorship always means you get infested by this ilk, because they have nowhere else to go.
On the sub, we would occasionally give them a slap so they would at least keep their power level private.
"Based" subreddits are a great example of how censorship benefits right-liberal gatekeepers. On places like reddit, there is always an excuse that hands are being forced by the admins so mods can ban the "undesirables" without looking like they are betraying their free speech stance. That won't work here (for now).
You get "infested by this ilk" because we are correct, and you're all but out of excuses to cover it up when you're in the alt tech gutter like this. We win the debate when we're allowed a seat at the table. Right-liberals know it. Leftists know it. That's why Zizek and Peterson will debate each other but not us.
Why is that an 'excuse'? Or do you mean that we were happy to be forced to ban people?
You may, but the kind of loser I'm talking about certainly did not. They also did not 'debate'.
How do you define 'winning a debate'? People generally just declare the person they agree with to be the winner.
For you personally, I doubt it. In general, yes, right-liberal gatekeepers love to have excuses to punch right and ban people to their right.
I was banned from the subreddit a long time ago.
It's all about the audience.
Gotta make sure there's a group of people that you can point at and say, "see? Those are the real bad guys that you should hate. We're better than them."
That's the kind of person that unfortunately wants to become a moderator to begin with.
The only good moderators I was able to find were the ones who never expressed interest, but whom I asked because they seemed good members of the community.
KiA2? Really? Permanently? That is a surprise. Was it a brand new user account?
So it depends on the composition of the audience?
Here, you're beating me when debating the Jews. Anywhere else, I think I would be beating you. If that is the standard.
They need more slapping here.
Otherwise these leftists will take over, and we will have reddit 2.0.
They do get over the top sometimes. But what can you do?
Get you as a moderator here and slap these leftists into submission. If not, I gladly take the mantle and slap them. DoM is rarely here and these scumbags are taking hold. Every couple of threads there is a leftist mongrel crying about some fake conspiracy theory about Jews.
I found some of that dissent silencing you were asking about.
u/AntonioOfVenice
Speaking of leftists, you're all about using their terminology. "Some fake conspiracy theory". Don't take that CIA-spawned drivel to heart. Conspiracy theories about governments have this strange habit of becoming accepted fact.