I'm starting to think .win is being infected by leftists just like reddit was. It is becoming impossible to enjoy anything without being bombarded with leftist ideology. On reddit leftists blame white people, in here leftists blame the jews. Why do leftists ruin everything they touch?
"Based" subreddits are a great example of how censorship benefits right-liberal gatekeepers. On places like reddit, there is always an excuse that hands are being forced by the admins so mods can ban the "undesirables" without looking like they are betraying their free speech stance. That won't work here (for now).
You get "infested by this ilk" because we are correct, and you're all but out of excuses to cover it up when you're in the alt tech gutter like this. We win the debate when we're allowed a seat at the table. Right-liberals know it. Leftists know it. That's why Zizek and Peterson will debate each other but not us.
On places like reddit, there is always an excuse that hands are being forced by the admins so mods can ban the "undesirables" without looking like they are betraying their free speech stance.
Why is that an 'excuse'? Or do you mean that we were happy to be forced to ban people?
You get "infested by this ilk" because we are correct, and you're all but out of excuses to cover it up when you're in the alt tech gutter like this. We win the debate when we're allowed a seat at the table.
You may, but the kind of loser I'm talking about certainly did not. They also did not 'debate'.
That's why Zizek and Peterson will debate each other but not us.
How do you define 'winning a debate'? People generally just declare the person they agree with to be the winner.
Get you as a moderator here and slap these leftists into submission. If not, I gladly take the mantle and slap them. DoM is rarely here and these scumbags are taking hold. Every couple of threads there is a leftist mongrel crying about some fake conspiracy theory about Jews.
No, it's just the Jewish Question that has people at odds here.
There's a fine line between A) rational criticisms of the Jews as a political entity or as an insular community at odds with the various nations they inhabit, and B) scapegoating them out of laziness or convenience or bigotry.
I have to give the debate to SR388-SAX here, not because I agree with his point of view entirely but because he's correct about "protection from criticism" and "neoptism."
I didn't give "my points of view," I just pointed out observations I've made, and then took the devil's advocate position because AoV wanted to argue about something else.
Probably the closest thing I gave to my "point of view" is that I wish that racist Jews got called out and shunned for being racists the same way non-Jewish white people are. Would probably help a lot to restore good faith discussion.
I'm starting to think .win is being infected by leftists just like reddit was. It is becoming impossible to enjoy anything without being bombarded with leftist ideology. On reddit leftists blame white people, in here leftists blame the jews. Why do leftists ruin everything they touch?
No censorship always means you get infested by this ilk, because they have nowhere else to go.
On the sub, we would occasionally give them a slap so they would at least keep their power level private.
"Based" subreddits are a great example of how censorship benefits right-liberal gatekeepers. On places like reddit, there is always an excuse that hands are being forced by the admins so mods can ban the "undesirables" without looking like they are betraying their free speech stance. That won't work here (for now).
You get "infested by this ilk" because we are correct, and you're all but out of excuses to cover it up when you're in the alt tech gutter like this. We win the debate when we're allowed a seat at the table. Right-liberals know it. Leftists know it. That's why Zizek and Peterson will debate each other but not us.
Why is that an 'excuse'? Or do you mean that we were happy to be forced to ban people?
You may, but the kind of loser I'm talking about certainly did not. They also did not 'debate'.
How do you define 'winning a debate'? People generally just declare the person they agree with to be the winner.
For you personally, I doubt it. In general, yes, right-liberal gatekeepers love to have excuses to punch right and ban people to their right.
I was banned from the subreddit a long time ago.
It's all about the audience.
They need more slapping here.
Otherwise these leftists will take over, and we will have reddit 2.0.
They do get over the top sometimes. But what can you do?
Get you as a moderator here and slap these leftists into submission. If not, I gladly take the mantle and slap them. DoM is rarely here and these scumbags are taking hold. Every couple of threads there is a leftist mongrel crying about some fake conspiracy theory about Jews.
No, it's just the Jewish Question that has people at odds here.
There's a fine line between A) rational criticisms of the Jews as a political entity or as an insular community at odds with the various nations they inhabit, and B) scapegoating them out of laziness or convenience or bigotry.
I have to give the debate to SR388-SAX here, not because I agree with his point of view entirely but because he's correct about "protection from criticism" and "neoptism."
I didn't give "my points of view," I just pointed out observations I've made, and then took the devil's advocate position because AoV wanted to argue about something else.
Probably the closest thing I gave to my "point of view" is that I wish that racist Jews got called out and shunned for being racists the same way non-Jewish white people are. Would probably help a lot to restore good faith discussion.
The problem is that these leftists are only about "B" and never the "A".