173 Corporations Including Disney, Sony, and Comcast Sign Letter Supporting Gay Marriage Act
(boundingintocomics.com)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
The definition of marriage has always been a man and a woman being bonded together. So there is no such thing as gay marriage by definition. We all know how much that people have shifted definitions though.
Not a coincidence that you put three major media companies in the OP title. Media shapes the culture. Allowing giant corporations to broadcast activist propaganda is a dangerous game. Until the dissident right realizes what they must do to fix that, they will always lose.
What CAN the dissident right do to fix that? The media is currently broadcasting the orthodoxy of the establishment. Until the right has a modicum of power, there's no way to influence that.
Comcast owns universal and NBC. The theme park industry is now controlled.
Funny, my company isn't on there, and we're a fortune 500 listing. We even top a few of their more narrowed lists. Guess supporting Trump and DeSantis might send the wrong message to the circuit queens over at the DNC's social wing, the HRC. Just out of curiosity, I wonder how many HRC members have monkey pox. No reason.
What does this even mean?
They're officially in support of Global Homosexuality as well as Global Homogenization.
But who is they? Are they personification a corporation?
What?
THEY SUPPORT MEN BUTT FUCKING
Go support gay marriage in Muslim countries, cowards.
B
U
R
G
E
R
S
?
About to seize the means of production just to grave-piss these ridiculous corporate boards. Mind your business.
I support gay marriage, because if two guys or girls want to be in a loving, monogamous relationship, they're aren't acting like slaanesh worshippers trying to get kids involved while creating new plagues
But don't call it marriage as that's state trying to supercede religion and that never works out.
You can't support gay marriage and then expect the gays not to call it marriage. The point is to devalue religion's influence on the greater population by bastardizing one of it's holiest tenets. Gay marriage was never about two consenting adults living together how they want. It was always about the destruction of religion and the nuclear family and through them ultimately the country.
I know you want to be a nice person and certainly you appear to have a live and let live ideal which, isn't bad. But in the case of homos, tolerance and compromise is exactly why in 2 decades we've gone from "what faggots do behind closed doors doesn't hurt anyone" to convincing prepubescent boys and girls to mutilate themselves with the support of government authority.
Oh that bit at the end was a little trap to sort out the reasonable from the activists. See the gay people that want a legal recognition of their relationship are currently either keeping their heads down or trying to side with the sane right as they see the shitstorm coming. They'd accept that compromise.
The ones using pride with a 'you're with us or against us' mentality won't accept that so I'd just sic the islamisists on them. Our biggest mistake was when we offered a very generous compromise that suited all parties (civil partnership) we didn't torch those that either refused it or demanded more.
We weren't able to democratically draw a line in the sand or negotiate because the debate was ended by a tyrannical federal dictate, just like in Roe Vs. Wade. Our biggest mistake was we didn't torch the Supreme Court in Minecraft.
And THAT is a reason to oppose this trend, no matter how liberal you are and how much you don't give a damn if gay people get married. Especially when we've found a sanctioned Russian state bank attached to at least one of the signers, and another is a foreign power ("Sir").
Was it Canada where dating someone off and on without living together counted as being married and the guy had to pay her a huge amount of money? Marriage or no marriage they will still find a way to profit.
Do you really think the very idea of marriage that has been around for tens of thousands of years is wrong?