Thank you for your service, Elon
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (98)
sorted by:
Women.
The economy.
Women.
The future or the world.
Women.
The state of the education system.
Women.
Well if we stopped educating women they'd be having more offspring, so...
Women crashed the economy?
Yes they vote for socialism and open borders. Basically white men are the only ones voting consistently for things like the 1st-10th amendment, free markets, and an actual border.
Wait, so you want to pat yourself on the back because 'white men' vote majority GOP, even though 'white women' also do?
I appreciate white women yes.
Then why did you specifically claim that 'white men' are everyone's savior, rather than 'whites'?
Because we vote more like this than any other demographic
White men were the only group to show more movement towards Biden. Blacks moved to Trump, Hispanics moved to Trump.
So you're betting on the wrong crowd if you think white men are your "savior".
What's the absolute percentages? Just cause blacks went from 8% gop to 12% under Trump doesn't mean anything. They still vote 88% Democrat and hate whites.
Trump was also at his best as a 2016 candidate. As President he failed to live up to his promises, and his 2020 campaign was very meh. It makes sense that he lost support from his strongest demo. He failed us. I still voted for him again, not that it matters in my state.
He delivered on pretty much every promise he made except drain the swamp.
How much does it pay to work at MediaMatters ?
Now ask yourself how that is even possible. Why would white men, Trump’s strongest demographic, move to the left after four straight years of being demonized by democrats? Leftists did absolutely nothing to lure white men away from republicans. So why did they change sides?
The simplest answer is that it didn’t happen. More likely, electronic voting machines flipped millions of votes in deep red counties. This is the best way to steal an election because no one audits a blowout. As long as Trump still wins by 10%, no one is going to dig deeper and realize it should have been 20%.
This type of fraud would generate two anomalies in the voting data.
First, the demographic most affected would be white men because they represent the largest demo in the reddest counties. This would show up as a disproportionate number of white men inexplicably switching sides.
Second, the down ticket republicans would inexplicably receive more votes than Trump. It was common knowledge that Trump boosted local republican politicians. So why would he receive fewer votes?
It’s pretty obvious that dominion switched millions of votes. Trump received too many votes (more than Obama) for the electronic fraud to steal the election, so the counting was stopped at midnight in the battleground states in order to produce enough votes to cement the win.
I know some of my dumbass friends voted for Kanye and were shocked that he ended up with 0% in their (red) districts.
Trump gave plenty of reasons to not vote for him - The First Step Act, The Platinum Plan, bump stock ban, failure to bring jobs back to places fucked over by globalization, failure to contain BLM rioting, bombing Syria (recall the MSM coverage became almost universally positive after that one).
No need for a leftist meme wall of text : Soy is the answer.
No, I just put them on the list four times because they are the main reason nobody wants kids. More people had kids in 2009 after the recession than in 2019 during the strong Trump economy.
Although they're doing a pretty good job of trying to crash it now.
Is that the case? You keep saying it, but your evidence for that is "I hate women, so everyone else does! YOU'RE NOT GETTING OUR PRECIOUS DICKS, WOMANS! WE ARE RESISTING YOUR MATRIARCHAL TYRANNY!"
Oh right, I saw your post complaining about 'feminist-controlled Citibank' saying the freaking obvious... that oil prices come down during recessions.
I mean, the one data point that has held strong through boom and bust in the economy, through leftist and right-wing leadership, is that birth rates are falling dramatically.
I remember when women had the climate cult burn their credibility at the start of the year, saying that people should still have kids because climate change can be stopped, contradicting years of their bullshit lies to kill the oil industry.
Oil just bounced back over $100 again, I hope Citigroup are getting beaten down hard on those oil shorts. It'll hit $65 when Citigroup stock hits zero. But no, I was talking about Yellen, Lagarde, Brainard and the one from the IMF that I don't know the name of. All of those people have done nothing but the wrong thing, over and over again. It's not incompetence, it's malice. I feel sorry for Powell, his position is like trying to land a plane with half the engines missing and a co-pilot that keeps trying to grab the controls to put it into the ground.
And you decided that this was caused by the womans? Shocker!
lol, you're an elaborate troll, aren't you?
They're always saying that climate change 'can be stopped', you idiot, because to say otherwise would rob them of the point: the ability to coerce people 'to stop climate change'.
So it's always 8 years away, but can still be prevented if you do exactly as they say right now.
You just ignored the 'recession' part, didn't you?
That's OK. I know you're good at ignoring stuff.
Yes, elites do nothing but the wrong thing, over and over again. Anything new?
You have far more in-group bias than any woman you hate (which is all of them).
Bro you just don't get it. If swapping between neoliberal Republicans and neoliberal Democrats doesn't change things, women must be the problem. ~40 years of neoliberalism couldn't possibly cause anything to go wrong.
What do you blame it on? It has to be either us or them. Everything else has changed over the last 20 years and not affected the trend at all.
No, it really happened. Some prominent climate cultist "scientist" was talking all about having kids, how the future won't be so bad and that not having kids to prevent climate change is a bad idea in some godawful media shill piece. Not long before Elon started his weird obsession, come to think of it.
But as we have been told for years, the best way to stop climate change is to stop having kids. So having their "scientists" tell us we should is a hilarious contradiction that shows where their real allegiances lie.
Oil will not fall to $65 in 2022, unless the midterm election goes horribly for the right. Citigroup threw that figure out there to try and will a collapse into existence to protect Biden.
Feminist manifestos literally said they'd take over the institutions that built the patriarchy and sabotage them from within. It was even in Solanas' little rant that's still taught in women's studies. The coincidence of the worst financial collapse building up while women hold all the positions to stop it and do nothing is statistically impossible.
Powell is our only hope to stop their bizarre plan. Remember, he was chosen by President Trump.
It's funny you incels think the problem is women aren't appealing to you. That's not what's causing the crash in birth rates. You're literally 1 in a million and completely expendable and unrequired to sustain birth rates.
It's women not wanting kids that's the issue. And the cause of that is Feminism, but not the way you think. Women entering the work force and businesses promoting the "career" over motherhood, changing women's perception about what makes a successful life. Because short term production is more important to a business than the continuation of the species over the long term.
You guys make yourselves to be way too important. Stop being so narcissistic.
Too bad he doesn't give them enough attention.
One of his kids already turned into a woketard.
So he's like all the other African American men then.
Nah.
"Not Enough" implies there is at least some attention to begin with, unlike your example, which is most of the time none. Nada. Zero. Zip.
Pump and dump.
I guess money can't do everything.
I think it is a common curse of power
In the Bible, many good kings and even prophets did a terrible job with their kids. David is probably most famous, one son raped his half sister, but David didn't know what to do with it, just left it alone, so the girl's full brother killed the rapist half brother.
Lots of people get too committed to work, sure, but when you are in a position where many other people's livelihoods depend on you, it is more difficult to just walk away to spend time with the kids. Maybe Musk doesn't think like this, but I know guys who do, who think about all their employees families who will be ruined if the company hits hard times.
Similar thing with some pastors I know, everyone wants them to come and do some thing for them and their family, or go schedule time for advice on deep things, and in the hustle they don't get the time with the family they need.
TL;DR It isn't good that he is a workaholic, but when thousands depend on your decisions being good to keep their jobs, it is more difficult to drop work.
True, but that is the fault of the terrible mothers.
As a man, it is his job to provide. There is no question that Elon provides for his family. The mother's job is to do the day to day raising of the children, but Elon pics fucking weirdos and models who have 0 interest in being good mothers. Oddly enough he may have bred his CEO because he finally decided to go with a woman who has excellent skills for raising children.
You think female CEOs have great skills for raising kids?
Yes, she had to display a very high level of competence and people skills to be able to do that position.
I don't think ALL CEOs would be good mothers, but in her case she seems like more of a "team player" type. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
LOL! Even assuming that, to think that whatever skills you need to be a CEO (manipulation, lying, psychopathy) are transferable to 'raising kids' is quite absurd.
Neuralink is a small company and I don't think she had to claw her way to the top. She's not the CEO, she's just in some executive position (Musk is CEO).
She went to Yale and studied machine learning. She's a member of the elite so apparently has good genetics.
And you're totally wrong about CEOs being psychopaths. That's an urban legend and total nonsense misconception. In reality, people with APD aka sociopaths have very poor professional outcomes. This whole idea that empathy is a huge disadvantage and that if only you could be a cold hearted bastard you'd have done better in life is a massive COPE. The truth is that people who lack empathy have bad outcomes because they are unable to maintain stable social networks, and THAT is hugely important to getting ahead in life.
Sociopaths who are master liars & manipulators generally only exist in fiction. The most common outcome for men with that trait in the US is to end up in prison.
Good genes like Hunter Biden and George Soros?
Puke. Yes, VP of diversity have really good genes. The people who say that men can get pregnant have great genes.
No, fuck the elites. They're worthless both as elites and as human beings.
Psychopaths are rather good at manipulating people. So they're good at maintaining social networks!
Perhaps, but that's because there are far many more men who are in prison than who are CEOs.
But Elon's an elite (though not a globalist) and he def has good DNA.
That's not all of it. Joe Biden provides for his son.
Blacks are by far the worst in terms of genetics. Hispanics are pretty similar to whites & asians, they just come from worse, more backward cultures in Central/South America. Whites also do badly in bad cultures, if you look at the former Soviet states.
But blacks? Unsalvageable. Just look at what an utter and total shitshow Sub-Saharan Africa is, and even when you take the blacks out of there and put them in rich white countries, they still end up way below everyone else in IQ and other outcomes. If you put in huge effort, you could probably close that gap somewhat, but they'd always act as a drag on everyone else.
Believe it or not, blacks were doing fine in America until welfare. FDR and Johnson destroyed the black family in America with handouts.
Sure, they were largely poor before handouts, but there really hadn't been much time since slavery to get acclimated to a new role in society and for generational wealth to get built, so that's to be expected. Still, black families and black churches were strong in the US, but then the men got kneecapped by Uncle Sam and his free bread.
yes, socialism made the black community much worse, but that's exactly what the Democrats were going for: a captive minority. Joe Biden was projecting when he said "put yall back in chains"
Latinos are a mixed bag. You have European Latinos which are generally high earning and low crime and mainly Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, and German. Then you get the savages that descend from tribes who are generally high crime lower iq.
This makes no sense, because there is a great amount of... diversity among the genes of different black populations. And even if we accepted all your assumptions, you would still be wrong, because Australian aboriginals unquestionably have a lower average IQ than any other group.
There are very good reasons why sub-Saharan Africa is a shitshow that have little to do with people being black. Same reason the inhabitants of the Canary Islands were at a Stone Age level when the Spanish encountered them: isolation.
IIRC, Blacks have better outcomes in the UK than do whites.
Same as black immigrants to your country. And of course, you can put all sorts of caveats on that - was the immigration a random sample? Probably not. Were the groups who became slaves a random sample? Also no.
Africa wasn't isolated like an island tho. You are literally putting Africans on par with a stone age society. Which is kind of our point. They have had extensive contact from Arab traders, Europeans, other African migrations, Indian traders, Chinese, and even migrations of North Africans and berbers.
Africa suffered from aborted colonisation unlike the Americas. When Europe was colonising Africa, they ran out of money and ressources, and thus bailed after halfway building up infrastructure.
Lol so Africa's problem is they didn't get colonized hard enough? You guys just can't admit low iq prevents development of high society.
Low IQ is a result of lack of colonisation. IQ isn't biological.
Even Europe was colonised, by the Romans.
Unlike you and leftist SJW types, I'm not racist, so I don't go looking for easy "color" based answers. The answer is simple : Colonisation brought agriculture. Agriculture is the reason we have an advanced society today. The Americas were turned from the traditionnal tribal hunt/gather society to sedentary agriculture based society it is now through colonisation. Africa didn't get that luxury.
Remember : the modern human species is 300,000 years old. Our modern societies evolved from 290,000 years of hunt/gather traditions to iPhones in only 10000 years because of agriculture. Without it, we would still be living in mud huts, picking fruits and killing animals.
The important thing is: when did they have that contact? Rather late. It's as if you think history started around 1000. As agriculture spread from the Fertile Crescent to the rest of Europe, Africa was mostly cut off. Africa is also internally cut off due to lack of rivers and a much smaller coastline than Europe.
Point is, the Sahara is a formidable barrier, and that is the sort of thing that retards development even in the absence of hypotheses about negative qualities that people there may or may not posses.
Africans have had contact since the ancient Egyptians. They have plenty of coastline and rivers lol. Look at south Africa today. It doesn't matter how much outsiders develop Africans because as soon as they leave the Africans return to african homeostasis. Low iq low functioning tribal society.
Much less than Europe 'lol'. Maybe look at a map. There is a lot of inland territory that is inaccessible by sea or river in Africa, and not so much in Europe.
You sound like a leftist talking about Clarence Thomas.
Clarence Thomas is not indicative of the general. We speak in generalities not 100% absolutism that applies to each individual.
You can have "great diversity" in other areas but still share traits that cause low IQ. I mean, they obviously share the same genes to look black, so it's not like they're wildly different.
Sub Saharan Africa was not isolated, and was huge in both size and population. Yet look at this map of IQ scores. FYI Mansa Musa was sub-saharan african and famously was the richest guy in the world & did a famous trip to the middle east. Africans traded and interacted with muslims and Islam spread throughout sub saharan Africa.
Later, european trade with west africa led to the slave trade, but that was still centuries ago.
No, that's wrong. Blacks in the United States have better outcomes than blacks anywhere else in the world. I just looked up the UK stats. & Source You can see blacks really underperform whites. Indians and Chinese do better at the high end, but Chinese also cluster at the bottom, too.
Numerous IQ studies have proven that when you raise blacks in the US and other rich white countries with the same education whites get, the IQ gap persists. You can't put your assumptions about how things ought to work against the cold hard facts.
The obvious reason that Nigerian immigrants to the US do relatively well is because they aren't a random sample, they are cherry-picked elites. Slaves were a much more massive group, and whole tribes shipped over en masse. It wasn't like the African enslavers were giving all the captured people exams and then only selling the low scorers. And of course blacks living in Sub Saharan Africa NOW, the "winners" in the slave trade who did the enslaving instead of getting enslaved, score the worst in the world. Some of this is due to nurture factors, but even controlling for those factors, they are still at the bottom.
You need to reject the faulty premise that all human groups are totally equal. We simply know that isn't true. Some groups are taller than others. Some groups have advantages like superior lung capacity (tibetans, chilaens). And yes, some groups are smarter than others.
I think a lot of people refuse to accept this because "nazi eugenics" or whatever. I don't care. If Hitler said the world was round, I wouldn't because a flat earther just because of that.
It's possible, but it's not something you can assume based on data from slave blacks who overwhelmingly came from West Africa, representing a tiny sliver of African DNA.
Clearly, you cannot know much about genetics, if this is the sort of stuff that you're going to say.
I think these are based on guesses and calculations and not surveys in those specific countries. What I'm saying is not that there are no IQ differences between groups. Obviously, there are. Including within different groups of blacks, which is something you're denying.
Do you normally precede stuff that everyone knows with an 'FYI'. The point is that a formidable barrier leads to more isolation than when there is not, and that this retards development.
You cite income data. I'm talking about educational outcomes. Which now comes to my mind, can be manipulated.
Elite in no way guarantees high IQ. This is just your assumption. It's valid as a hypothesis, but you can't go around claiming that this is defintively true unless you provide some empircal evidence for it.
It may also be that Nigerians, particularly Ibos, have a different culture from black Americans that leads to better use of their intelligence rather than neglect. Or it might be that they are higher IQ than black Amereicans.
I don't assume that. There is nothing in nature that guarantees that people will be equal in every respect, or that evolution has to stop at the neck. Still, any difference has to be demonstrated, not assumed. And I do often get the impression that you simply do not like blacks. I think you're literally the only one on the sub I had to ding for that.
Group differences are real. The only question is whether these differences are genetic. It seems highly likely that they are, though there is also evidence against it - like the fact that Jews scored very poorly on IQ tests when they first arrived in the US, or differences between highland and lowland Scots who have the same genetics.
Depends on what kinda brown. But you're right.
I love how the libs went into a frenzy over a supposed scandal, only for him to UNO card reverse on them
There isn't an underpopulation crisis, there's just a useless-shitskin overpopulation crisis.
Who doesn't want low iq people overruning everything. I live around them. They trash everything, pay no taxes, have tons of kids that turn out just like them. The system can only withstand so much insanity. Look at south Africa! Look at France now, the ghettos and rape. The crime. It's a disgrace and we get banned for even talking about it. How about those in leadership, even mods here, actually have the balls to confront the real problem instead of banning the poor folks who point out the emperor has no clothes.
What a whore.
Putting his dick in crazy so you don't have to?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grimes
Edit: Also Chelsea/Bradley Manning cucked him. Ouch. https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2022/03/11/grimes-ditching-elon-musk-for-chelsea-manning-has-the-internet-questioning-reality
Grimes is a psycho. Musk's autism caused him to be very intelligent and a hard worker, but completely zeroed out his stats when it came to women. He picks really absurd women. So his kids already inherit his autism, and then also have to deal with whatever mental shit their moms have.
I mean, Musk also fucked Amber Heard and Heard now has a baby. She won't say who the father is. There is speculation that it's Musk's kid. Now, Amber Heard has borderline personality disorder, and Musk is autistic. So that kid has got some fucked up genetics right off the bat.
I'm a bit OOTL on this one - this is a different scandal from Elongate I take it?
yeah, he bred the CEO of Neuralink in secret and it just came out
https://nitter.it/elonmusk/status/1545046146548019201#m
Meet the new aristocrats with their haremesque family legacy.
While the rest of the peasants either produce 5+ kids they can't raise right, or screech for putting medically approved clothes hangers up their crotch.
All is right with the world.
Wish it would fucking collapse in Asia and Afreaka.
Fuck the Japanese, they're the ones living in fucking pods. They should be looking forward to their olds dying off.
And we were fucking promised they'd be "just like us" and use birth control too, and we were promised the Earth's population WOULD NEVER HIT 8 BILLION TO BEGIN WITH.
Fuck humans doubling their numbers in 50 fucking years, while whining and kvetching about other species. Fuckers won't be happy until they've squeezed, starved, and eaten everything that isn't their own demonic selves off the planet. Humans deserve a reckoning.
Elon better be hoping to take the breeders to his new, dead planet, all alone, like they deserve. Get off the Earth, fucker!
Are you OK?
Well it's an anti-natalist, so no.
?
What's up with all the trolls posting here lately?
Well, if that system works, we will be seeing the results in Afghanistan soon!