Germany tells Lithuania to immediately remove the blockade against Kaliningrad.
(theconservativetreehouse.com)
Comments (68)
sorted by:
NATO does not want to provoke a war for Lithuania, for obvious reasons. Especially if Lithuania is the aggressor by violating its treaty obligations.
The problem with NATO is the tiny former Soviet Republics that joined up. All their leaders have little man's disease and beef for former slights. The asshole President of Georgia tried to get NATO to defend him as he was fucking around with Russians in South Ossetia. And he was told no and lost territory.
The shit Lithuania is doing is provacatory and if they don't comply should put them up for review as being a NATO member. Ultimately leading to them being removed.
Lithuania responds to Russia violating its treaty obligations to protect Ukraine in exchange for nuclear weapons.
The problem with this argument is that the United States violated the Budapest Memorandum first. The United States violated the sovereignty of the Ukrainian people when it backed the Kievan Euromaidan Revolution against the actual winner of the 2010 election and was caught on tape deciding who it should install as the new interim leader.
PAmericans under Obama also tried to keep their good relations with Russia, continuing the retarded Russophilic "Reset" policy initiated personally by Hillary Clinton in 2009.
That's also why America gave Ukraine no lethal weapons (the things to actually kill Russians with) until Trump replaced Obama and finally sent them, later mocking Obama for having sent only "pillows and blankets".
For that matter, Trump had also Russians directly killed in Syria by Americans. This couldn't happen under Obama too, of course, and today Biden too is ignoring the renewed Russian provocations in Syria instead of killing the provocateurs, Trump style.
Similarly, Trump also finally killed Soleimani, and wanted to have Assange just kidnapped or assassinated, embassy or no embassy, and so on (China, North Korea, Islamic State, etc.). Extremely bold on the foreign policy issues compared to the Democrats who are afraid to do anything, and even actually want to be friends with hostile regimes (in regard with Russia, Clinton personally was also involved in the Uranium One scandal, and her husband had both propped up Yeltsin and nuclearily disarmed Ukraine in the 1990s). Libya was the only time when the Democrats were hawkish like Trump (or Reagan and the Bushes before him), and even there they only followed the Brits and French into the battle.
Unfortunately, Trump was at the same time a softy coward on domestic issues like BLM/Antifa terrorist insurrection or mass indoctrination of children into sex cults. America needs a new Lincoln to get the Democrats back to their place (not necessarily battlefield mass graves this time round, hopefully).
All while Russia sent an liaison officer who convinced Yanuk the proper course of action is to gun down some of them uppity peasants.
The recorded conversation was actually about convincing the opposition to take Yanuk's compromise offer (he offered Yats becomes PM), against EU hard line ("fuck the EU!"). The opposition refused to listen to the Americans and rejected that "poisoned deal", to quote Yats at the time.
The Americans had a soft spot for Yanuk and the conflict was over EU-Ukraine relationship. The opposition was naturally especially supported by Poland, just like Belarusian today (including Belarusian political exiles and refugees being trained here for a rebel army, for now fighting just in Ukraine - and some of these guys are N-words but these ones get their training rather from Azov or RS).
I think it's pretty funny that a country with a military budget of a whooping 1.5 billion EUR (only increased from just over 1 bil in 2022), zero combat aircraft (yes, seriously, the closest thing they have is TWO antique Mi-17s), and 23000 total personnel is trying to swing its dick at a nuclear power. It would be way funnier if my country wasn't allied with these faggots.
Solution: make Lithuania a nuclear power too.
What could be better than a country with a clear inferiority complex led solely by woman-run parties having nuclear codes?
Just like the ~UKRAINIAN BIOLABS~ worked on that virus carried by birds that would only selectively exterminate all the ethnic Russians on Earth, the Lithuanian Feminist Armed Empire (FAE) will use their nuclear power to #KillAllMen.
I wouldn't trust them with an unloaded pistol, much less nuclear weapons.
All of these feminist countries need to be disarmed. If you want to be led by people who believe male lives are worth nothing, you lose your ability to have a military.
You surely are aware how Russia is only sending men to die in Ukraine?
Or how the Women's Day is a national holiday in Russia, while men only get the Defender Day, because it's their function.
Russia is not sending conscripts, according to official communications.
Because it's an old Soviet holiday. What's your point here? I'm not a Russian nationalist, I just want Zelensky to lose already.
https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-ukraine-war-illegally-detained-conscripts-pressure/31926058.html
Lithuanian politicians could show their population "ROAR we are big, we show the Russian bear who is boss!"
They had 1-2 weeks of fame.
Then everyone told them to stfu, because they are irrelevant. Germany gets the rep to have prevented an escalation there and Russia is happy to have shown everyone they get their people supplied.
Win for everyone, no one really cares.
Germany lost control of "Kaliningrad" in 1945, when Kalinin was not yet in hell.
We're winning. Ukraine on constant retreat, Lithuania suffering an embarrassing rebuke from their EU allies and Von Der Leyen forced to take steps against war rather than towards it.
[Z]
I'm not sure there's a "we" necessarily, but if I had to pick a side, I'd choose Russia. I mostly just want this thing to be over with so people stop dying for the "liberal world order".
Anyone who the GAE declares as the enemy is automatically a potential ally to its dissidents.
Will you say so about China too? North Korea? Do you do believe so about AQ and Islamic State?
Also, why do you guys insist on your idiotically made up fake acronym that you and only you alone use? Why not something even remotely real, like NWO, if not just USA?
Russian internal propaganda does use "USA" to identify their enemy, США in Cyrrylic. (And "England" for the UK, the other top global adversary, actually hated much more than America and since the 19th-century Great Game and then the absolute obsession of the early Soviet era when most of the show trials were about the supposed "English spies", even Beria was declared one after they killed him in turn.) Never anything like "GAE", as you do.
Happy 4th July, wannabe traitors.
yes, why not?
to make you mad, and its pronounced "GAY" which is both funny and appropriate
The idea of the USA was mortally wounded with the bullets that hit Kennedy and gurgled its last breath under Obama. What is left is a skinwalker that uses its old name and references toward past glories to keep the frog from boiling too fast.
Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.
Your journey to a full blown commie will be finally complete.
Kennedy refused to use the regular military to back the CIA in deposing Castro by force. It's ironic he was shot by a defector to the Soviet Union.
Yeah, I wondered about that. I guess it has to be minimally respectable.
Although I will say that while I despise the Taliban, I did have a guilty pleasure over seeing the GAE humiliated by them.
NWO is too broad and vague. USA does not cover its dependencies in Europe.
Good thing I'm European.
No you're an Arab lmao
JK (Rowling), you're honorary.
The Taliban in Pakistan now use advanced American weapons and gear (gifted by the Afghan Taliban) to fight against Pakistani state that had created the Taliban. It's a circle of death!
Also, Iran is going to invade Af. Even the Hazara (Shia) Taliban just rebelled to join the Panjshir Tajiks (Iranian people) already in rebellion.
Arabized. But my point is that I live in Europe. It's pretty cumbersome to say that, so I choose the easier path.
At least Pakistan will finally have to fight back, rather than do nothing.
I thought the Taliban took Panjshir a long time ago. I doubt Iran is going to do anything. They're more of the big bark, proxy war variety.
They took it several weeks after Kabul but there's an insurgency and now it's the fighting season. Recently they lost a Blackhawk shot down for example.
Iran's concentrating their tank forces on the border. But yeah, previously also did so with Azerbaijan and nothing came out of it.
Chinese dissidents who delivered data to us on the SARS-COV2 bioweapon - at risk of death or worse; are heroes, and worthy friends.
North Korean citizens who have escaped from the clutches of communist brutality as well have provided us with vital information on how to detect and prevent marxist takeovers - heroes again, and worthy friends indeed.
AQ and the Islamic State are not 'nations', but rather organizations created by the American intelligence bureaus.
IS is a state with a nation (and their country, still existing despite all the Trump's boasting, just today mostly in Africa).
Even if you believe the stupid bullshit about "blowback" in case of proto-AQ in Afghanistan 1980s, then IS was created as ISI just to fight the Americans (and all of American allies) in Iraq when it was supported by Syrian intelligence agencies (and run by former operatives of Iraqi ones, when the Baathists and ex-Baathists put away their old rivalries).
So much for the world-spanning caliphate they wanted to be. Cool, point it out on a map or something.
https://www.criticalthreats.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/CTP-Africa-Islamic-State-safe-havens-1.jpg
https://www.criticalthreats.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/10-29-19-Africa-graphic-1-2.png
https://www.criticalthreats.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/SJMovementInAfricaMay2021.png
I don't want to pick any side, but I'm going to do the opposite of whatever Biden asks.
I'm on the side with lower gas prices and lower food costs
Just out of curiosity: why is Ukraine losing 'us winning' all of a sudden?
https://archive.ph/YkpRw
It's always been us winning, fuck Ukraine.
Wait, you're mad because Ukraine mobilized only men, like every other state in the history of humanity?
That's an odd thing to be mad about.
The best part is Imp constantly hating on the “stormcucks” while rabidly opposing Ukraine, which has a literal Jewish puppet government installed by the globalists lol
I don't think they care about his Jewishness, except as a reason to dismiss criticism of Stormfags in Ukraine. After all, they're strong supporters of Azov and the Right Sector.
Do you use plural "they" about Imp? Surely don't you think he's a girl irl?
I mean the 'globalists' who support Z[e].
And I do suspect that Impy is a girl.
Zelensky received 1.7bn from the European Central Bank, authorized by the European Commission, both of which are led by [blank].
Except Ukraine told their people before the dirty EU money came in that everyone would fight.
Pretty sure a 20 year old woman is more capable of fighting than a 60 year old man.
No, they don't. To cite some Russian external propaganda (for foreigners willing to become Russian soldiers),
https://www.rbth.com/science-and-tech/331042-how-to-join-russian-army
Russians also dont send women to the conflicts abroad, like in Syria or Ukraine.
The whole concept of women soldiers as normal (and not unique instances, or absolute desperation) is inherently feminist.
You are a literal militant feminist.
I have no issues with not letting women fight. But when you're forcibly conscripting men and not letting them flee, it would seem like the situation is also dire enough that you should be conscripting women too even if it's not in a frontline capacity and not let them flee
Ukraine has lost many millions of people just to the demographics crisis and is projected to lose HALF OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION in just the next 2 decades (Russia only 1/3, due to high Muslim birth rates).
Do you know what is the actual purpose of young women in a society, before feminism brainwashed people to think otherwise?
Or for example the story of Paraguay, where once almost every (not a hyperbole, something like 90%) male died in a war fought literally to the last man (later also fought by male children), and yet now 150 years later the nation still exists?
I'm not sure what you're trying to convince me of here. I'm aware that Russia is very tradcucked.
Zelensky said women would fight, then stuck the knife in - after 2 years of "gender equality" propaganda under his piss-poor leadership. After taking huge bribes from woman-led European institutions.
When did he say so? The biggest thing about the Ukrainian female soldiers was how they were made them march in high heels on a parade, and the Western media were outraged about it (yet not about how the American male soldiers were made to march in high heels few years earlier). That and some photoshoots, just as with the photoshoots of the separ poster girls on the other side of the conflict (and the separ draft of #YesAllMen came first). It was never a feminist army Western style, with lots of female combat soldiers and female high ranking officers (and trannies).
Also just stop being such a feminist.
Nazis like you deserve hell.
History will judge the allies of the Ukrainian regime extremely harshly.
"I'm on the right side of history."
Doing wonders proving you're not an SJW, Impy.