No, they don't. To cite some Russian external propaganda (for foreigners willing to become Russian soldiers),
Gender
The Russian Armed Forces welcomes both men and women. Yet, no woman will be running on a battlefield with an AK-12 in her hands. Every woman who's willing to become a soldier is welcome, but only for work assigned to military headquarters or as a nurse.
I have no issues with not letting women fight. But when you're forcibly conscripting men and not letting them flee, it would seem like the situation is also dire enough that you should be conscripting women too even if it's not in a frontline capacity and not let them flee
Ukraine has lost many millions of people just to the demographics crisis and is projected to lose HALF OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION in just the next 2 decades (Russia only 1/3, due to high Muslim birth rates).
Do you know what is the actual purpose of young women in a society, before feminism brainwashed people to think otherwise?
Or for example the story of Paraguay, where once almost every (not a hyperbole, something like 90%) male died in a war fought literally to the last man (later also fought by male children), and yet now 150 years later the nation still exists?
If your only issue is population, just import more then. As it is, the people arguing why men should be conscripted forcefully say its because its an existential crisis for ukraine and if they lose this, there will be no more ukraine. Seems like that would be a reason to send the women to battle too, cause who gives a fuck about 150yrs later when your nation might not exist in a year or 2 time
They're against the immigration because they're, well, white nationalists. Unlike Russia that has taken millions of Central Asians (mostly Uzbeks) and Chinese.
Meanwhile Azov are against even the patriotic Tatars to come from occupied Crimea to the mainland Ukraine.
You can say Russia is more pragmatic by allowing being replaced.
I'm not sure what you're trying to convince me of here. I'm aware that Russia is very tradcucked.
Zelensky said women would fight, then stuck the knife in - after 2 years of "gender equality" propaganda under his piss-poor leadership. After taking huge bribes from woman-led European institutions.
When did he say so? The biggest thing about the Ukrainian female soldiers was how they were made them march in high heels on a parade, and the Western media were outraged about it (yet not about how the American male soldiers were made to march in high heels few years earlier). That and some photoshoots, just as with the photoshoots of the separ poster girls on the other side of the conflict (and the separ draft of #YesAllMen came first). It was never a feminist army Western style, with lots of female combat soldiers and female high ranking officers (and trannies).
Maybe you should read more than screenshots of headlines sometimes.
The order, which came into effect on Dec. 17, lists 100 professions. All Ukrainian women who are from 18 to 60-years-old and employed in these professions must get registered with their local conscription office before the end of 2022.
Although some took the order to mean that women will be required to fight, it’s not the case.
There is no mandatory conscription for women in Ukraine. Even in case of a full-blown Russian invasion, the registered women can only be offered to join the military, not forced.
However, in case of a war they can be required to participate in civil defense efforts, possibly using their professional skills. It doesn’t mean they will be fighting.
No, they don't. To cite some Russian external propaganda (for foreigners willing to become Russian soldiers),
https://www.rbth.com/science-and-tech/331042-how-to-join-russian-army
Russians also dont send women to the conflicts abroad, like in Syria or Ukraine.
The whole concept of women soldiers as normal (and not unique instances, or absolute desperation) is inherently feminist.
You are a literal militant feminist.
I have no issues with not letting women fight. But when you're forcibly conscripting men and not letting them flee, it would seem like the situation is also dire enough that you should be conscripting women too even if it's not in a frontline capacity and not let them flee
Ukraine has lost many millions of people just to the demographics crisis and is projected to lose HALF OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION in just the next 2 decades (Russia only 1/3, due to high Muslim birth rates).
Do you know what is the actual purpose of young women in a society, before feminism brainwashed people to think otherwise?
Or for example the story of Paraguay, where once almost every (not a hyperbole, something like 90%) male died in a war fought literally to the last man (later also fought by male children), and yet now 150 years later the nation still exists?
If your only issue is population, just import more then. As it is, the people arguing why men should be conscripted forcefully say its because its an existential crisis for ukraine and if they lose this, there will be no more ukraine. Seems like that would be a reason to send the women to battle too, cause who gives a fuck about 150yrs later when your nation might not exist in a year or 2 time
They're against the immigration because they're, well, white nationalists. Unlike Russia that has taken millions of Central Asians (mostly Uzbeks) and Chinese.
Meanwhile Azov are against even the patriotic Tatars to come from occupied Crimea to the mainland Ukraine.
You can say Russia is more pragmatic by allowing being replaced.
I'm not sure what you're trying to convince me of here. I'm aware that Russia is very tradcucked.
Zelensky said women would fight, then stuck the knife in - after 2 years of "gender equality" propaganda under his piss-poor leadership. After taking huge bribes from woman-led European institutions.
When did he say so? The biggest thing about the Ukrainian female soldiers was how they were made them march in high heels on a parade, and the Western media were outraged about it (yet not about how the American male soldiers were made to march in high heels few years earlier). That and some photoshoots, just as with the photoshoots of the separ poster girls on the other side of the conflict (and the separ draft of #YesAllMen came first). It was never a feminist army Western style, with lots of female combat soldiers and female high ranking officers (and trannies).
Also just stop being such a feminist.
https://media.communities.win/post/LCoZbEcxsIfG.jpeg
Maybe you should read more than screenshots of headlines sometimes.
https://kyivindependent.com/national/explained-new-requirement-for-ukrainian-women-to-register-for-possible-military-service
Also yes, the famous high heels parade is the illustration there too.