Germany tells Lithuania to immediately remove the blockade against Kaliningrad.
(theconservativetreehouse.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
I have no issues with not letting women fight. But when you're forcibly conscripting men and not letting them flee, it would seem like the situation is also dire enough that you should be conscripting women too even if it's not in a frontline capacity and not let them flee
Ukraine has lost many millions of people just to the demographics crisis and is projected to lose HALF OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION in just the next 2 decades (Russia only 1/3, due to high Muslim birth rates).
Do you know what is the actual purpose of young women in a society, before feminism brainwashed people to think otherwise?
Or for example the story of Paraguay, where once almost every (not a hyperbole, something like 90%) male died in a war fought literally to the last man (later also fought by male children), and yet now 150 years later the nation still exists?
If your only issue is population, just import more then. As it is, the people arguing why men should be conscripted forcefully say its because its an existential crisis for ukraine and if they lose this, there will be no more ukraine. Seems like that would be a reason to send the women to battle too, cause who gives a fuck about 150yrs later when your nation might not exist in a year or 2 time
They're against the immigration because they're, well, white nationalists. Unlike Russia that has taken millions of Central Asians (mostly Uzbeks) and Chinese.
Meanwhile Azov are against even the patriotic Tatars to come from occupied Crimea to the mainland Ukraine.
You can say Russia is more pragmatic by allowing being replaced.
take white people only then