Man’s role is independence, woman’s is subjugation. This tracks across every biological and evolutionary biology argument. It tracks across the entire animal kingdom. Women will always seek subjugation over independence and men will always seek independence from subjugation. “Weak” men are really just societal girls that have been denied the ability to taste independence.
As good as it is to have that longer explanation with several dozen sources, there's only one fact you need for explaining the fact that Feminism has always been shit. And that is that it's based around Conflict Theory. The commies were based around conflict theory. Nazi Germany was based around conflict theory. In fact, any authoritarian movement is almost certainly going to be based around conflict theory.
It's basically group Y is the root of all problems faced by group X. For Feminism, Y is men and X is women. For Communism, Y is the bourgeoise/rich and X is the proletariat. For Nazi Germany, Y is the Jews and X is the German People.
Patriarchy Theory is a core tenet of Feminism and reaches back to the original movements, and it's the theory that states men are the reason women have problems in the world. You cannot severe Feminism from Patriarchy Theory, as it's no longer Feminism without that basis for Feminist Theory.
Conflict Theory is one of the most manipulative methods out there, and it utilises victimhood as a form of currency while promising a better life. It absolves you of failures or hardships you face and puts the onus on someone else. Doesn't really matter who else, just someone else. It's how Leftists have operated for centuries. This time around, it's a multi-identity tactic: men, whites, straight, and "cis" are the villains, and the hardships face by anyone else isn't their own fault, it's "cis" straight white men who are to blame, and without them you would definitely would have succeeded in life. Doesn't amtter if there are countless examples to the contrary, because it's not meant to be rational, it's meant to make you feel better. Which is why so many that believe the broader umbrella of SocJus ideology are so often mentally ill.
With women in charge.... i think we would never have great advancements or it would come at a much lower rate. Perhaps we would never created the wheel, discover antibiotics or launch shit into space. We would probably still be in the stone age.
Studies show that 80% of women are only interested in the top 20% of men and consider 80% of males as below average (woman logic) which lines perfectly with wanting to reducing the male population to 10% of humanity (80% reduction of 50% global population).
Don't count on it. That would make the competition for the 10% of men absolutely crazy. One of the hypotheses for why the black community is such a mess regarding single parents, is that because there are so many blacks in jail, there is tons of competition for black men - and women are in a very weak negotiating position to make demands like commitment or condom use.
Right again? What was the first time? Even this time, all he did was be his jackass self, which you made into "HE IS A PUPPET!" No, he's just a blithering idiot.
But you say that about everyone, including Ron DeSantis!
Man’s role is independence, woman’s is subjugation. This tracks across every biological and evolutionary biology argument. It tracks across the entire animal kingdom. Women will always seek subjugation over independence and men will always seek independence from subjugation. “Weak” men are really just societal girls that have been denied the ability to taste independence.
"Weak" men and "stronk" women, have led us to the current enlightened times.
islam is right about women
FTFY
they're also right about faggots
You mean pseudo-women?
I'm still going through old testament so when I get around to Koran I'll get back to you.
As good as it is to have that longer explanation with several dozen sources, there's only one fact you need for explaining the fact that Feminism has always been shit. And that is that it's based around Conflict Theory. The commies were based around conflict theory. Nazi Germany was based around conflict theory. In fact, any authoritarian movement is almost certainly going to be based around conflict theory.
It's basically group Y is the root of all problems faced by group X. For Feminism, Y is men and X is women. For Communism, Y is the bourgeoise/rich and X is the proletariat. For Nazi Germany, Y is the Jews and X is the German People.
Patriarchy Theory is a core tenet of Feminism and reaches back to the original movements, and it's the theory that states men are the reason women have problems in the world. You cannot severe Feminism from Patriarchy Theory, as it's no longer Feminism without that basis for Feminist Theory.
Conflict Theory is one of the most manipulative methods out there, and it utilises victimhood as a form of currency while promising a better life. It absolves you of failures or hardships you face and puts the onus on someone else. Doesn't really matter who else, just someone else. It's how Leftists have operated for centuries. This time around, it's a multi-identity tactic: men, whites, straight, and "cis" are the villains, and the hardships face by anyone else isn't their own fault, it's "cis" straight white men who are to blame, and without them you would definitely would have succeeded in life. Doesn't amtter if there are countless examples to the contrary, because it's not meant to be rational, it's meant to make you feel better. Which is why so many that believe the broader umbrella of SocJus ideology are so often mentally ill.
Conflict Theory is the basis for all of it.
Great post
With women in charge.... i think we would never have great advancements or it would come at a much lower rate. Perhaps we would never created the wheel, discover antibiotics or launch shit into space. We would probably still be in the stone age.
Women love blacks, black societies have lived in tribal shitholes for thousands of years. All you need to know.
Studies show that 80% of women are only interested in the top 20% of men and consider 80% of males as below average (woman logic) which lines perfectly with wanting to reducing the male population to 10% of humanity (80% reduction of 50% global population).
Don't count on it. That would make the competition for the 10% of men absolutely crazy. One of the hypotheses for why the black community is such a mess regarding single parents, is that because there are so many blacks in jail, there is tons of competition for black men - and women are in a very weak negotiating position to make demands like commitment or condom use.
For some bizarre reason you're assuming women are being rational and have thought it through.
This. Plus that kind of competition does not produce feminine women. It produces women who become great beasts. See the black community.
Yes, it makes an actually effective argument.
lol.
Right again? What was the first time? Even this time, all he did was be his jackass self, which you made into "HE IS A PUPPET!" No, he's just a blithering idiot.
But you say that about everyone, including Ron DeSantis!
Got a solid laugh out of me
We were all thinking it.