I mean, just read this shit. There is NO consideration for men as people, as humans in this. There is no consideration given to women lying and destroying young men in university. They really do not think men are people.
Herd suing for abuse? Bitch you are a stupid person and you are high. She used the court of public opinion to get what she wanted because she knew that even our modern legal system would laugh her out of the building.
She destroyed her ex's career with false public accusations ( after making his life Hell by abusing him, with violence ), with suppport from main Feminists associations.
Amber Heard didn't even need to bring her false accusations to the police to end the guy professionally. It's superflus, because the media and Feminists associations ListenAndBelieve women.
But it's a huge problem HE sued her for defamation. Feminism is cancer.
This "strategy" might be used by abusers, they say? Like how Amber Heards counter-sued her ex? Weird they didn't bring this up.
Almost like they still believe she is the victim instead of the violent abuser. Almost like they will always side with liars and abusers if it's a woman vs a man.
(With possible politically-convinient exceptions where they just memory-hole the accusations, such as when Joe Biden was "credibly-accused").
There is no consideration given to women lying and destroying young men in university. .
I am a victim of this. College girlfriend was also a student employee in the finance department. When we split (after her Mom browbeat her into breaking up), she made it so I lost all of my scholarships. And then filed a false police report claiming I was abusive to her. College then told me that if she ever saw me in person again, it would be charged as assault.
I think this view is partly due due the insane speech laws in Britain: you can actually sue someone for telling the truth about you if it causes damage to your reputation. They just don't value truth like America does.
A huge part of this trial was the accusation that Heard lied (with a little help) about Depp abusing her, when really it was the opposite, as evidenced by the verdict. In Britain, the same verdict could have been achieved even if Heard was telling the truth.
Not that the "expert" here aren't pieces of shit (as usual), but it's also a cultural thing.
Filing a defamation case may be used by perpetrators of abuse? Amber Heard is right fucking there. She, the perpetrator of abuse, filed a defamation case against her victim.
The best parts of their articles are where they get "opinion" or "voice" sections which feature three to five paragraphs of far left political drivel from someone like Laura Kuenssberg. They slip those in there to (likely) bypass any sort of guidelines on inserting their organisational opinions into otherwise benign decisions or events in an effort to control the narrative.
Alexandra Brodsky said. "It was Depp suing Heard for saying she was abused at all, and not even by him.
Sounds like we have another case of defamation here. Amber Heard admitted, on the stand, under oath, that she wrote the op ed about Depp. Liars.
Ms Brodksy described a growing "cottage industry" of lawyers and PR consultants who advise young men on how to clear their name after being
accused of sexual assault
Good. Either prove it in a court of law or shut up.
I fail to see anything wrong with it, when you accuse a guy of sexual assault and you lie you should be charged with defamation. If anything it is extremely hard to prove defamation and should be more serious consequences if you destroy a guys life.
It's a mix between dummies who don't have the whole story, or an extremely distorted version, and there are people who want to weaponize the justice system against their outgroup enemies.
This is exactly what should happen (although I didn't expect Depp to actually win). People are attacked but they continue to behave responsibly and legally (and gather evidence; you could take lessons, sexual assault victims) and are vindicated by the courts. Anyone denying that justice was served here, or that this is a bad precedent, is obviously suspect.
Johnny Depp barely managed to win this one, you need way to much evidence and some very expensive lawyers to prove defamation against a woman that charges you with assault.
They have no reason to be threatened but they still act out like emotional harpies.
really interesting to see how openly they are about hating men and wanting men to all have bad life outcomes
I mean, just read this shit. There is NO consideration for men as people, as humans in this. There is no consideration given to women lying and destroying young men in university. They really do not think men are people.
Herd suing for abuse? Bitch you are a stupid person and you are high. She used the court of public opinion to get what she wanted because she knew that even our modern legal system would laugh her out of the building.
She destroyed her ex's career with false public accusations ( after making his life Hell by abusing him, with violence ), with suppport from main Feminists associations.
Amber Heard didn't even need to bring her false accusations to the police to end the guy professionally. It's superflus, because the media and Feminists associations ListenAndBelieve women.
But it's a huge problem HE sued her for defamation. Feminism is cancer.
This "strategy" might be used by abusers, they say? Like how Amber Heards counter-sued her ex? Weird they didn't bring this up.
Almost like they still believe she is the victim instead of the violent abuser. Almost like they will always side with liars and abusers if it's a woman vs a man.
(With possible politically-convinient exceptions where they just memory-hole the accusations, such as when Joe Biden was "credibly-accused").
"This strategy might be used for people we abuse to defend themselves against our continued, escalating abuse towards them"
I am a victim of this. College girlfriend was also a student employee in the finance department. When we split (after her Mom browbeat her into breaking up), she made it so I lost all of my scholarships. And then filed a false police report claiming I was abusive to her. College then told me that if she ever saw me in person again, it would be charged as assault.
I think this view is partly due due the insane speech laws in Britain: you can actually sue someone for telling the truth about you if it causes damage to your reputation. They just don't value truth like America does.
A huge part of this trial was the accusation that Heard lied (with a little help) about Depp abusing her, when really it was the opposite, as evidenced by the verdict. In Britain, the same verdict could have been achieved even if Heard was telling the truth.
Not that the "expert" here aren't pieces of shit (as usual), but it's also a cultural thing.
Filing a defamation case may be used by perpetrators of abuse? Amber Heard is right fucking there. She, the perpetrator of abuse, filed a defamation case against her victim.
Oh no! Men falsely-accused may use the proper legal way to redress tort!
How is that a problem? Oh right, women who lie about abuse, including sexual, might be held accountable. Feminists in shambles.
BBC has always been this way.
Maybe slightly more polished.
Every day more and more people learn how utterly shit the BBC is in terms of reporting.
The best parts of their articles are where they get "opinion" or "voice" sections which feature three to five paragraphs of far left political drivel from someone like Laura Kuenssberg. They slip those in there to (likely) bypass any sort of guidelines on inserting their organisational opinions into otherwise benign decisions or events in an effort to control the narrative.
Sounds like we have another case of defamation here. Amber Heard admitted, on the stand, under oath, that she wrote the op ed about Depp. Liars.
Good. Either prove it in a court of law or shut up.
I fail to see anything wrong with it, when you accuse a guy of sexual assault and you lie you should be charged with defamation. If anything it is extremely hard to prove defamation and should be more serious consequences if you destroy a guys life.
It's Kyle Rittenhouse all over again.
It's a mix between dummies who don't have the whole story, or an extremely distorted version, and there are people who want to weaponize the justice system against their outgroup enemies.
This is exactly what should happen (although I didn't expect Depp to actually win). People are attacked but they continue to behave responsibly and legally (and gather evidence; you could take lessons, sexual assault victims) and are vindicated by the courts. Anyone denying that justice was served here, or that this is a bad precedent, is obviously suspect.
Johnny Depp barely managed to win this one, you need way to much evidence and some very expensive lawyers to prove defamation against a woman that charges you with assault.
They have no reason to be threatened but they still act out like emotional harpies.
she wasn't abused. if she were, there'd be evidence of it. and the media would have posted it every day.