I mean, just read this shit. There is NO consideration for men as people, as humans in this. There is no consideration given to women lying and destroying young men in university. They really do not think men are people.
Herd suing for abuse? Bitch you are a stupid person and you are high. She used the court of public opinion to get what she wanted because she knew that even our modern legal system would laugh her out of the building.
She destroyed her ex's career with false public accusations ( after making his life Hell by abusing him, with violence ), with suppport from main Feminists associations.
Amber Heard didn't even need to bring her false accusations to the police to end the guy professionally. It's superflus, because the media and Feminists associations ListenAndBelieve women.
But it's a huge problem HE sued her for defamation. Feminism is cancer.
This "strategy" might be used by abusers, they say? Like how Amber Heards counter-sued her ex? Weird they didn't bring this up.
Almost like they still believe she is the victim instead of the violent abuser. Almost like they will always side with liars and abusers if it's a woman vs a man.
(With possible politically-convinient exceptions where they just memory-hole the accusations, such as when Joe Biden was "credibly-accused").
There is no consideration given to women lying and destroying young men in university. .
I am a victim of this. College girlfriend was also a student employee in the finance department. When we split (after her Mom browbeat her into breaking up), she made it so I lost all of my scholarships. And then filed a false police report claiming I was abusive to her. College then told me that if she ever saw me in person again, it would be charged as assault.
I think this view is partly due due the insane speech laws in Britain: you can actually sue someone for telling the truth about you if it causes damage to your reputation. They just don't value truth like America does.
A huge part of this trial was the accusation that Heard lied (with a little help) about Depp abusing her, when really it was the opposite, as evidenced by the verdict. In Britain, the same verdict could have been achieved even if Heard was telling the truth.
Not that the "expert" here aren't pieces of shit (as usual), but it's also a cultural thing.
I mean, just read this shit. There is NO consideration for men as people, as humans in this. There is no consideration given to women lying and destroying young men in university. They really do not think men are people.
Herd suing for abuse? Bitch you are a stupid person and you are high. She used the court of public opinion to get what she wanted because she knew that even our modern legal system would laugh her out of the building.
She destroyed her ex's career with false public accusations ( after making his life Hell by abusing him, with violence ), with suppport from main Feminists associations.
Amber Heard didn't even need to bring her false accusations to the police to end the guy professionally. It's superflus, because the media and Feminists associations ListenAndBelieve women.
But it's a huge problem HE sued her for defamation. Feminism is cancer.
This "strategy" might be used by abusers, they say? Like how Amber Heards counter-sued her ex? Weird they didn't bring this up.
Almost like they still believe she is the victim instead of the violent abuser. Almost like they will always side with liars and abusers if it's a woman vs a man.
(With possible politically-convinient exceptions where they just memory-hole the accusations, such as when Joe Biden was "credibly-accused").
"This strategy might be used for people we abuse to defend themselves against our continued, escalating abuse towards them"
I am a victim of this. College girlfriend was also a student employee in the finance department. When we split (after her Mom browbeat her into breaking up), she made it so I lost all of my scholarships. And then filed a false police report claiming I was abusive to her. College then told me that if she ever saw me in person again, it would be charged as assault.
I think this view is partly due due the insane speech laws in Britain: you can actually sue someone for telling the truth about you if it causes damage to your reputation. They just don't value truth like America does.
A huge part of this trial was the accusation that Heard lied (with a little help) about Depp abusing her, when really it was the opposite, as evidenced by the verdict. In Britain, the same verdict could have been achieved even if Heard was telling the truth.
Not that the "expert" here aren't pieces of shit (as usual), but it's also a cultural thing.