I mean it wouldn't be surprising. I don't even know how much Twitter reports as far as users go but perhaps it's a number that's just ridiculously unrealistic. What constitutes fake as well? If I go make an account to parody Joe Biden is that a fake account even if it's extremely active and followed?
If that was Musk's angle on this to expose them, that's fine too. I don't really care what happens to Twitter. As far as I'm concerned Twitter is such a lost cause that if I were given ultimate control and resources personally, I don't think I could even fix it myself. It's a flawed concept. Just I don't think it can get any worse either, so what they start censoring more and shoving more woke shit in everyone's faces. Those that fall for that at this point are already lost.
Oh dear, picture the average leftist wall of text meme. Now give me the no limits on twitter. They are going to flood the threads with incomprehensible psuedo science.
They report monetizable daily average users. You're still a single user, but if you post on your parody account a lot more than your main it will still contribute to mDAU. Bot accounts should not contribute to mDAU at all, and presumably a human in a comment farm running 500 accounts should only count as a single user.
If I were a multi-billionaire and I wanted to destroy Twitter, here's what I'd do.
First, I'd offer to buy the company for some ridiculously inflated sum.
Then, because the company's value is almost entirely tried to its number of active users, I'd force them to provide proof of what percentage of users are genuine.
Then when they can't do it, thereby opening themselves up to numerous lawsuits and legal penalties, I'd withdraw my offer and watch the company burn down using its own lies as accelerant.
I'm not saying that's what Elon is doing, but it is what I would do.
I think the answer, after that Veritas thing, is Twitter simply is not interested in making money. They've gone all-in on the culture warrior side of things, so yeah, they are willing to defraud their investors - and regulators - to get the win, as they see it.
They have no plan B. If they can't control Twitter, then they lose a lot of reach. I believe that's why Trump just went and made his own. He could have bought it, but chose not to. I doubt he'll (Musk) buy it even at a fire sale price. I think all Musk wants to do is just pull the drapes back and expose to the light what really goes on so people can see for themselves.
According to him, yes. Not that I have any reason to doubt it. I'm just saying the net worth of Trump is not something clear cut or that he is abundantly clear about.
They'd be talking about it for decades. He lives rent free as is. He'd be the first thing they thought of when they get up, and the last thing they think of before bed.
delicious
And unlike the Epstein debacle the powers that be will have no problem burning the san fran tranny brigade as a scapegoat
RIP AND TEAR UNTIL IT IS DONE
The only thing they fear is @elonmusk
Watch out, you'll get the Elon Hateboys all over you.
I mean it wouldn't be surprising. I don't even know how much Twitter reports as far as users go but perhaps it's a number that's just ridiculously unrealistic. What constitutes fake as well? If I go make an account to parody Joe Biden is that a fake account even if it's extremely active and followed?
If that was Musk's angle on this to expose them, that's fine too. I don't really care what happens to Twitter. As far as I'm concerned Twitter is such a lost cause that if I were given ultimate control and resources personally, I don't think I could even fix it myself. It's a flawed concept. Just I don't think it can get any worse either, so what they start censoring more and shoving more woke shit in everyone's faces. Those that fall for that at this point are already lost.
The best explanation I've heard for TikTok existence is that it's a Chinese psyop designed to showcase and encourage the west's worst traits.
That would make sense especially since they ban western degeneracy on the Chinese TikTok.
The Chinese really missed Vines, but wanted to control them better.
Oh dear, picture the average leftist wall of text meme. Now give me the no limits on twitter. They are going to flood the threads with incomprehensible psuedo science.
This could be AI generated.
What are humans, but computers built using blood, fat, salt, and bile?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=463kgfoe3pE
Ok rapist now go kys
They report monetizable daily average users. You're still a single user, but if you post on your parody account a lot more than your main it will still contribute to mDAU. Bot accounts should not contribute to mDAU at all, and presumably a human in a comment farm running 500 accounts should only count as a single user.
If I were a multi-billionaire and I wanted to destroy Twitter, here's what I'd do.
First, I'd offer to buy the company for some ridiculously inflated sum.
Then, because the company's value is almost entirely tried to its number of active users, I'd force them to provide proof of what percentage of users are genuine.
Then when they can't do it, thereby opening themselves up to numerous lawsuits and legal penalties, I'd withdraw my offer and watch the company burn down using its own lies as accelerant.
I'm not saying that's what Elon is doing, but it is what I would do.
Is Elon doing some 4D chess shit? How are the Twitter higher ups so fucking incompetent? Project Veritas BTFO'd them too!
I think the answer, after that Veritas thing, is Twitter simply is not interested in making money. They've gone all-in on the culture warrior side of things, so yeah, they are willing to defraud their investors - and regulators - to get the win, as they see it.
They have no plan B. If they can't control Twitter, then they lose a lot of reach. I believe that's why Trump just went and made his own. He could have bought it, but chose not to. I doubt he'll (Musk) buy it even at a fire sale price. I think all Musk wants to do is just pull the drapes back and expose to the light what really goes on so people can see for themselves.
Trump doesn't have that kind of money. Musk is far, far richer. Musk wouldn't miss $53 billion, whereas Trump doesn't have $53 billion.
According to him, yes. Not that I have any reason to doubt it. I'm just saying the net worth of Trump is not something clear cut or that he is abundantly clear about.
Seeing the push back Musk is getting, what do you think would have happened if Trump tired to buy Twitter?
They'd be talking about it for decades. He lives rent free as is. He'd be the first thing they thought of when they get up, and the last thing they think of before bed.