WAKE UP and Smell the Burning of Our Constitution - The United States has proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations which will be voted on by the World Health Assembly scheduled for May 22-28, 2022.
Do not forget that "racism" has been defined as a disease by these orgs.
So if someone finds a garage pull loop in their garage, or someone goes to get Subway at 2am and is accosted by gay Nigerian fitness gurus in MAGA hats, then all your freedoms and liberties? Poof, gone, reduced to atoms.
At this rate they will try to define not being a leftist as a "mental health" disease like how they created the ridiculous diagnosis of "oppositional defiant disorder" in the DSM.
This was defined as "a pattern of angry/irritable mood, argumentative/defiant behavior, or vindictiveness". This behavior is usually targeted toward peers, parents, teachers, and other authority figures.
It looks like authoritarianism looms on the horizon.
Only good thing is that there is no way in hell that everyone will just accept this nonsense.
Sure people cucked out during COVID sure but for my sanity I will remain hopeful that people will refuse to bend down to this insanity.
At this rate they will try to define not being a leftist as a "mental health" disease like how they created the ridiculous diagnosis of "oppositional defiant disorder" in the DSM.
I am not an expert, but it's hard to think of psychology as anything more than a pseudoscience. Or maybe an approximation. Kind of like astrology used to be to what astronomy is today. People had no idea what stars were, or even really planets, but they could predict where they'd be.
They do their best to characterize the behavior an organ they don't really understand the functioning of. But there's no certainty and no bright lines. Today something might be a disorder; tomorrow it's a personality trait.
I wonder if the intent is instead simply to remove the individual states from any position of power on this.
Covid enforcement in the US was marked by a patchwork of varying levels of lockdown and mask mandates because it was decided state-by-state.
If we're screwing around and throwing international treaties at it, I'm presuming that this bypasses the states entirely and is decided at Federal level.
They want to try to force an unilateral lockdown and mandate response on ALL of the states.
Red states got out of lockdown faster and some didn't even lockdown at all like South Dakota. Red states generally stopped mask mandates by now. Red states generally didn't have any vaccine mandates and vaccine passports.
This is a brazen attempt to destroy our 10th amendment rights that each state has through the vehicles of a WHO pandemic treaty and amendments to the IHR treaty.
I pray that after two full years of this bullshit we have enough people telling them to go to hell with this authoritarianism.
The good news is that this will likely have the opposite effect. If Dr Commie tries to actually use this power, a bunch of states will just not listen, which would be a severe blow to DC's authority in general.
Masks on planes were an annoyance but them being brazen enough to try to lockdown the entire country's populace again or force vaccines on everyone again after seeing the harmful effects of lockdowns and the side effects of these shitty vaccines gives me hope that it won't end well at all for them.
I am alarmed by what they are trying to do but I have a weird sense of optimism of people's response to it.
Sure their leftists will get their NPC firmware updates and follow along but I doubt the right and independents will make this mistake again.
We need to be aware of their authoritarian moves but this shouldn't make you blackpilled that everything is already hopeless.
Things are definitely bad currently but I still believe they have foolishly moved too quickly to grasp absolute control and that they will fail miserably.
It seems clearly designed to sneak laws into the US WITHOUT ANY consultation or approval from congress :
So for instance, the lockdown, where you see 26 million today locked down in Shanghai, China, they can’t leave their apartments or homes, the WHO would have the authority to be able to impose that here in the United States for whatever pretext they want, they don’t have to show data, they could do this. What this does, bottom line, is it creates a platform for global governance through the WHO. This is what people need to know, it’s time sensitive. No one knew about this. The Biden administration gave these proposed amendments to the World Health Organisation on January 18th, no one in America knew this until April 12th, less than a month ago.
But in less than in two weeks, in Geneva Switzerland, the delegates will vote on this. The Biden administration has already released a list of countries, 40 of the most powerful countries in the world, including Canada, including the EU, including the U.K., including Australia, these countries are going along with the Biden administration’s insane push to give sovereignty over [to] the untrustworthy WHO. Again, this creates a platform for global governance.
We both know you are asserting Judeo-Bolshevism, and insisting that medicalization of political opposition is an innately jewish act. As such, this is a violation of Rule 16
This. They are greedy, and they project their failings onto others. Combine that with a stubbornness that doesn't know when to quit when they're behind, and you have an entity that just simply wont stop until they're forced.
You said it- the Peacekeepers. China has raised an army of 10s of thousands of PK’s for the UN in the last year. Also this whole war we’re in was started as an excuse to kick Russia from its position as president of the UN Security Counsel. They refused to vote Yes on a motion (proposed by Melinda Gates, that bitch) that would allow NATO troops of any nation to put boots on the ground in America (the draft specifically named America), and supersede the U.S. Constitution.
This is what I’ve been trying to tell people for months: Putin was literally the ONLY No vote at the UN SecCon, but since Russia was president they had Veto power. Linda Thomas Greenfield threw a fit that she couldn’t betray the U.S., and the EU set this whole scheme in motion to kick Russia off the SecCon. The successors to Russia were the United Arab Emirates. They’re going to be the ones who enforce the WHO commands in America.
And who’s going to stop them? Lloyd Austin killed and neutered most of our military. The rest are either mixed in with various European brigades across the world, or replaced with diabolical tranny monsters who hate us anyways. We’re on our own. Buy guns and buy ammunition.
Yes and no. Yes the Biden Regime is making agreements, no you can't actually give up sovereignty.
This is the same thing as when people were harping on giving sovereignty over to the UN.
No one, literally no one, can do that. The Constitution supersedes everything within the law.
The end-run around is congress promising to pass laws that reflect treaties. We can see how well that works with Climate Change agreements, and the fact that most of the time no one actually makes laws domestically to follow them.
With regards to the climate issue, they have been using executive orders and federal agency regulations to attack and weaken the fossil fuel industry in order to force their climate agenda on everyone.
I think it is possible that even though it is blatantly unconstitutional they will try to somehow enforce these authoritarian pandemic treaties domestically in the U.S.
Since you generally provide insightful comments, I am curious about what you think will actually come out of this.
Look, you said it yourself. They also just plainly disregard the law in multiple cases. They are already doing the bidding of the Cathedral... because they are the Cathedral. This really isn't going to change anything because no one has actually done anything different. The formal structures that are in place, are still in place. The informal workarounds are also still in place. The leadership hasn't changed.
Yes, American sovereignty is being eroded by a globalist elite, but that's been the case for nearly 100 years. The regime continues to serve the interests of the cathedral. It will continue to do so. I don't get why this is an issue.
The thing that still remains, again, is that the courts do not accept international treaties for domestic law... which means that the regime either makes a law or an executive order. As they already do.
It's just kind of a nothing-burger. We're not going to be ruled by Belgium like the Brits were, but we're still going to have to deal with the same people pulling the same shit.
And that is why the UK would have been more free as a US State, than a member of the European Union.
Hell, you actually get the freedom to police your own borders.
And your Royal Navy Carriers?
Article 1 of the Constitution. Also, the 2nd Amendment actually still applies to the "State Militias". Your entire nuclear force could just be reclassified as a British State Militia, and no changes have to be made.
The reporting that this "strips every nation of its own sovereignty" is wrong and click-baity for sure, but if the current administration willingly delegates their authority to China (let's be real that's all the WHO is) and none of the other sources of power within the country present any real pushback - the way the states have willingly given up their sovereignty to the feds - isn't it effectively the same thing? If it lasts long enough you'll even have idiot judges ruling that following the international treaties is precedent and "settled law".
International treaties can't be precedent. That's the point. They must be ratified by a domestic legislature.
I agree that the Regime is acquiescing to the Cathedral, but what the hell is the difference between being ruled by the Cathedral, and abiding by the Cathedral's policies? It doesn't really make any sense. One way or another, the Cathedral is still in power, and nothing has changed.
Yes.
WAKE UP and Smell the Burning of Our Constitution - The United States has proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations which will be voted on by the World Health Assembly scheduled for May 22-28, 2022.
Alex Jones has been covering it too. This is serious. Next up, covid forever + climate change disease.
Do not forget that "racism" has been defined as a disease by these orgs.
So if someone finds a garage pull loop in their garage, or someone goes to get Subway at 2am and is accosted by gay Nigerian fitness gurus in MAGA hats, then all your freedoms and liberties? Poof, gone, reduced to atoms.
At this rate they will try to define not being a leftist as a "mental health" disease like how they created the ridiculous diagnosis of "oppositional defiant disorder" in the DSM.
This was defined as "a pattern of angry/irritable mood, argumentative/defiant behavior, or vindictiveness". This behavior is usually targeted toward peers, parents, teachers, and other authority figures.
It looks like authoritarianism looms on the horizon.
Only good thing is that there is no way in hell that everyone will just accept this nonsense.
Sure people cucked out during COVID sure but for my sanity I will remain hopeful that people will refuse to bend down to this insanity.
Don't get blackpilled.
They already have.
I am not an expert, but it's hard to think of psychology as anything more than a pseudoscience. Or maybe an approximation. Kind of like astrology used to be to what astronomy is today. People had no idea what stars were, or even really planets, but they could predict where they'd be.
They do their best to characterize the behavior an organ they don't really understand the functioning of. But there's no certainty and no bright lines. Today something might be a disorder; tomorrow it's a personality trait.
Shit they can't even tell me if I have autism :)
Sounds like you've got a case of "sluggish schizophrenia," comrade!
Time for a nice and mandatory stay in an institution, along with some nice and mandatory medication!
and in the meantime + Ukraine.
Ahh, that old chestnut.
How to pass a law that is not constitutional doesn't carry enough domestic support anyway?
Get it put in a treaty and sign the treaty.
You can't enforce a treaty that supercedes the constitution.
Yes you are right on this but what they are doing on May 22 is apparently amending the IHR treaty that was already ratified by the Senate previously.
I wonder if the intent is instead simply to remove the individual states from any position of power on this.
Covid enforcement in the US was marked by a patchwork of varying levels of lockdown and mask mandates because it was decided state-by-state.
If we're screwing around and throwing international treaties at it, I'm presuming that this bypasses the states entirely and is decided at Federal level.
Bingo.
They want to try to force an unilateral lockdown and mandate response on ALL of the states.
Red states got out of lockdown faster and some didn't even lockdown at all like South Dakota. Red states generally stopped mask mandates by now. Red states generally didn't have any vaccine mandates and vaccine passports.
This is a brazen attempt to destroy our 10th amendment rights that each state has through the vehicles of a WHO pandemic treaty and amendments to the IHR treaty.
I pray that after two full years of this bullshit we have enough people telling them to go to hell with this authoritarianism.
Can't have Florida having all the old people but less death rates than the blue masked up jabbed up states. Makes too many people think.
Remember, just because it's true it doesn't mean it cannot be "misinformation"!
The good news is that this will likely have the opposite effect. If Dr Commie tries to actually use this power, a bunch of states will just not listen, which would be a severe blow to DC's authority in general.
I am not sure on this.
If it doesn't require ratification again then that is why they are doing this.
This looks to be different.
Masks on planes were an annoyance but them being brazen enough to try to lockdown the entire country's populace again or force vaccines on everyone again after seeing the harmful effects of lockdowns and the side effects of these shitty vaccines gives me hope that it won't end well at all for them.
I am alarmed by what they are trying to do but I have a weird sense of optimism of people's response to it.
Sure their leftists will get their NPC firmware updates and follow along but I doubt the right and independents will make this mistake again.
We need to be aware of their authoritarian moves but this shouldn't make you blackpilled that everything is already hopeless.
Things are definitely bad currently but I still believe they have foolishly moved too quickly to grasp absolute control and that they will fail miserably.
And when was the last time a US administration actually bothered to get a treaty and approved by the senate?
Who is going to make the lawless follow laws?
I just made a post about this :
It seems clearly designed to sneak laws into the US WITHOUT ANY consultation or approval from congress :
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity attacks
This is obviously the thing you took offence to.
So a subset of soviets, and a subset of jews is now somehow attacking the entire group?
We both know you are asserting Judeo-Bolshevism, and insisting that medicalization of political opposition is an innately jewish act. As such, this is a violation of Rule 16
I was well within the rules as written. Stop putting words in my mouth.
lmao how are they going to enforce this? Their "Peacekeepers"? or the Cathedral's zealots? Soft power exile us to death?
Once their soft power fails, they will be stupid enough to use hard power.
They are moving too quickly to grasp absolute power on the population.
I believe they will fail miserably.
This. They are greedy, and they project their failings onto others. Combine that with a stubbornness that doesn't know when to quit when they're behind, and you have an entity that just simply wont stop until they're forced.
You said it- the Peacekeepers. China has raised an army of 10s of thousands of PK’s for the UN in the last year. Also this whole war we’re in was started as an excuse to kick Russia from its position as president of the UN Security Counsel. They refused to vote Yes on a motion (proposed by Melinda Gates, that bitch) that would allow NATO troops of any nation to put boots on the ground in America (the draft specifically named America), and supersede the U.S. Constitution.
This is what I’ve been trying to tell people for months: Putin was literally the ONLY No vote at the UN SecCon, but since Russia was president they had Veto power. Linda Thomas Greenfield threw a fit that she couldn’t betray the U.S., and the EU set this whole scheme in motion to kick Russia off the SecCon. The successors to Russia were the United Arab Emirates. They’re going to be the ones who enforce the WHO commands in America.
And who’s going to stop them? Lloyd Austin killed and neutered most of our military. The rest are either mixed in with various European brigades across the world, or replaced with diabolical tranny monsters who hate us anyways. We’re on our own. Buy guns and buy ammunition.
Yes and no. Yes the Biden Regime is making agreements, no you can't actually give up sovereignty.
This is the same thing as when people were harping on giving sovereignty over to the UN.
No one, literally no one, can do that. The Constitution supersedes everything within the law.
The end-run around is congress promising to pass laws that reflect treaties. We can see how well that works with Climate Change agreements, and the fact that most of the time no one actually makes laws domestically to follow them.
With regards to the climate issue, they have been using executive orders and federal agency regulations to attack and weaken the fossil fuel industry in order to force their climate agenda on everyone.
I think it is possible that even though it is blatantly unconstitutional they will try to somehow enforce these authoritarian pandemic treaties domestically in the U.S.
Since you generally provide insightful comments, I am curious about what you think will actually come out of this.
Nothing different from what already happens.
Look, you said it yourself. They also just plainly disregard the law in multiple cases. They are already doing the bidding of the Cathedral... because they are the Cathedral. This really isn't going to change anything because no one has actually done anything different. The formal structures that are in place, are still in place. The informal workarounds are also still in place. The leadership hasn't changed.
Yes, American sovereignty is being eroded by a globalist elite, but that's been the case for nearly 100 years. The regime continues to serve the interests of the cathedral. It will continue to do so. I don't get why this is an issue.
The thing that still remains, again, is that the courts do not accept international treaties for domestic law... which means that the regime either makes a law or an executive order. As they already do.
It's just kind of a nothing-burger. We're not going to be ruled by Belgium like the Brits were, but we're still going to have to deal with the same people pulling the same shit.
That is unfortunately not how it works in the EU.
And that is why the UK would have been more free as a US State, than a member of the European Union.
Hell, you actually get the freedom to police your own borders.
And your Royal Navy Carriers?
Article 1 of the Constitution. Also, the 2nd Amendment actually still applies to the "State Militias". Your entire nuclear force could just be reclassified as a British State Militia, and no changes have to be made.
The reporting that this "strips every nation of its own sovereignty" is wrong and click-baity for sure, but if the current administration willingly delegates their authority to China (let's be real that's all the WHO is) and none of the other sources of power within the country present any real pushback - the way the states have willingly given up their sovereignty to the feds - isn't it effectively the same thing? If it lasts long enough you'll even have idiot judges ruling that following the international treaties is precedent and "settled law".
International treaties can't be precedent. That's the point. They must be ratified by a domestic legislature.
I agree that the Regime is acquiescing to the Cathedral, but what the hell is the difference between being ruled by the Cathedral, and abiding by the Cathedral's policies? It doesn't really make any sense. One way or another, the Cathedral is still in power, and nothing has changed.
This is only a formality. US government isn't domestically controlled anyway.
Has the who declared racism a “health” issue yet?!
Yes
shoot anyone with a white or blue helmet, and we win