That part confused me. Usually the gendered language is either completely based or completely cucked. I don't think I've ever seen the half and half stuff that they did in this article.
It's the same argument regardless of which female space they're invading at the moment. They say they're not safe in the male space. It's bullshit but if you pretend that the fears legitimately exist there are solutions that don't involve them invading female spaces. Single stall gender neutral bathrooms, special sections in male prisons, etc. Those solve the "we don't feel safe in male spaces" problem. What they don't solve in the "we want to perv on and rape women in their spaces" problem these troons actually have.
No, this is a dude who decided he wants to be a woman. The masculine pronouns are correct. They did a hell of a job mixing up the gendered language though as AoV pointed out.
I know. I was referring to the article itself, wherein the author decided to play along with the mutant's charade. Playing pretend is for children and actors. Mentally ill predators do not deserve that luxury.
A report by the Adult Diagnostic and Treatment Center in Avenel concluded Volz was not a sexually violent predator, Cowell said. "She's not a monster," he said. "She's not an animal."
I mean, they're defending a dude who who forced his 7 year old daughter to star in a kiddy porn film he was directing/producing. So this level of support qualifies. We all know he wouldn't have gotten that defense if he wasn't a troon.
Pedophilia is also a keystone to antifascism. Wilhelm Reich's 1933 book, The Mass Psychology of Fascism, lays out that fascism is caused by not sexualizing children, somehow. This was best put into practice by Dr Kentler in Germany who intentionally put foster children with convicted pedophiles.
Where are you getting this from? Primary or secondary source? It sounds outlandish even by the standards of the far-left. Even leftists would have driven you out of town if you advocated for sexualizing kids in the 1930s.
Even leftists would have driven you out of town if you advocated for sexualizing kids in the 1930s.
Really? Arthur Bryant's Unfinished Victory talks about how child prostitutes were rampant in Weimar Berlin, and it was considered a mark of their democratic freedom. Then there was the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft, which is no different from the current tranny kid stuff going on. Weimar leftists were out of control. A lot of the films burned by Nazis were child porn.
It is true as far as I can tell from the original (translated) source. It was written in 1933 by a Jewish Austrian Psychologist (also communist and pedophile), and was after Hitler's Mein Kampf, with several direct responses to the work. He was very influential and helped lay down the foundations for Psychology a hundred years ago. He came directly after Freud, was a direct disciple of Freuds, was director of a major Freud clinic, and worked with Freud's children after Freud's passing. He was also (like all psychologists) a complete fraud and he believed in molesting children and that 'orgone energy' from orgasms could cure cancer.
Eg, the first hit for 'child' reads that sex and child sex is important in communism, and the only reason Marx didn't know about it is because sexology is just invented.
Hence, we are not saying anything new, and we are not revising Marx, as is so often maintained: ‘All human conditions ‘, that is, not only the conditions that are a part of the work process, but also the most private and most personal and highest accomplishments of human instinct and thought; also, in other words, the sexual life of women and adolescents and children, the level of the sociological investigation of these conditions and its application to new social questions. With a certain kind of these ‘human conditions’, Hitler was able to bring about a historical situation that is not to be ridiculed out of existence. Marx was not able to develop sociology of sex, because at that time sexology did not exist. Hence, it now becomes a question of incorporating both the purely economic and sex-economic conditions into the framework of sociology, of destroying the hegemony of the mystics and metaphysicians in this domain.
If you repress children (ie, don't groom them) they become repressed right wing fascists. Mind that this is Freud era psychology, so it truly believes that however a child is raised is how they are.
[Freud's] The third great discovery was that childhood sexuality... On the contrary, the repression intensifies it and enables it to manifest itself in various pathological disturbances of the mind.
...One becomes a bit sceptical and asks how is it possible for the masturbation of small children and the sexual intercourse of adolescents to disrupt the building of gas stations and the manufacturing of aeroplanes. It becomes apparent that it is not cultural activity itself which demands suppression and repression of sexuality, but only the present forms of this activity, and so one is willing to sacrifice these forms if by so doing the terrible wretchedness of children and adolescents could be eliminated. The question, then, is no longer one relating to culture, but one relating to social order.
The moral inhibition of the child’s natural sexuality, the last stage of which is the severe impairment of the child’s genital sexuality, makes the child afraid, shy, fearful of authority, obedient, ‘good’, and ‘docile’ in the authoritarian sense of the words.
The entire work continues this way really. There's hundreds of references to children, and the majority are about how sexual grooming/masturbation/molestation is good because it keeps them from becoming too Fascist. Grooming is inherently Jewish Bolshevism Revolutionary and cannot be adopted by fascists, therefore they must groom children. (Note: The call out is because Reich uses a particular meaning for "revolutionary" and "fascist", which does not match up with modern usage. He instead means the political blocks, "fascist" is particularly Hitler's movement; "revolutionary" is particularly international Jewish Bolshevism.)
Similar questions concern work with children. It may sound strange - to some incomprehensible - but the fact remains: In the main, revolutionary work with children can only be sex-economic work. Overcome your astonishment and listen patiently. Why is it that children in the pre-pubertal stage can be directed by sexual education in the best and easiest way? ...
The usual methods employed by the freedom movement to organize children are the same as those employed by the reactionaries in their work with children: marching, singing> dressing up, group games, etc....the child does not distinguish between the content of reactionary and revolutionary forms of propaganda. To see to it that reality is not glossed over is only the first commandment of anti-fascist education. It is our contention that children and adolescents will march just as happily to fascist music tomorrow as they march to liberal music today.
While it is true that political reaction is far superior in its organizational work with children, there is one thing that it cannot do: It cannot impart sexual knowledge to children; it cannot give them sexual clarity, nor can it dispel their sexual confusion. Only the revolutionary movement can do this. First of all because it has no interest in the sexual suppression of children.
The most direct statement I found from reading his work is this, which is one of the current and very influential lines of thinking for LGBT groomers. This is what they're trying to make into a reality today: mandatory grooming by law.
With respect to medicine and education, the deplorable fact will have to be corrected that hundreds of thousands of physicians and teachers hold the weal and ill of every new generation in their hands, though they know nothing about the laws pertaining to the biosexual development of the small child. And this is still the case forty years after the discovery of childhood sexuality. Fascist mentality is hourly and daily, inculcated in millions upon millions of children and adolescents owing to the ignorance of educators and physicians. Two demands shoot into the foreground at this point. First: Every physician, educator and social worker etc., who is to deal with children and adolescents will have to prove that he himself or she herself is healthy from a sex-economic point of view and that he or she has acquired exact knowledge on human sexuality between the ages of one and about eighteen. In other words, the education of the educators in sex-economy must be made mandatory. The formation of sexual views must not be subject to the hazard, arbitrariness and influence of neurotic compulsive morality. Second: The child’s and adolescent’s natural love of life must be protected by clearly defined laws. These demands may sound radical and revolutionary. But every one will admit that the
fascism that grew out of the frustration of childhood and adolescent sexuality has had a far more radical and revolutionary effect, in the negative sense of the words, than the social protection of nature ever could have in a positive respect. Every modern democratic society is full of individual attempts to effect a change in this area. But these islands of understanding perish in the swath of the plague spread by the biologically rigid, moralistic educators and physicians who stand above the society as a whole.
There is not much sense in going into detail here. Each individual measure will result spontaneously, if only the basic principle of sexual affirmation and the social protection of childhood and adolescent sexuality is adhered to.
Literally thinking that he's part of the good guys because he molests and grooms kids.
It follows from this that sex-economy, which wants to liberate the natural sexuality of children, adolescents and adults from neuroses, perversions and criminality, cannot be criticized from the point of view of anti-sexual moralism, for the moralist wants to suppress and not to liberate the natural sexuality of children and adolescents.
This is what we still see today. You barely have to change the wording, and it's clear that they still believe all this. They've just gotten smart enough to not say it out loud as much.
Most people who are trans now are young people who are victims of a sick culture.
And it won't stop until we start dealing with the troomers who tell anxious and confused minors that mutilating themselves is the one and only path to happiness. The grooming victims deserve help, like any other victim does provided they don't victimize others. But once they decide that dragging others into the hole they're in is preferable to trying to get out they deserve the woodchipper just like their own groomers.
I get the impression that there is a stronger correlation between self-identified trans people (itself already a mental illness) and sexual deviancy than there is with men in general.
Your impression is correct. The clinical jargon for what you're describing is "paraphilias tend to cluster". In laymen's terms, no one has only one disgusting fetish. Transgenderism, beastiality, pedophilia, torture shit, and a ton of other degenerate fetishes almost always come in the same package. It's exceedingly rare for only one to be present. It's really no coincidence that Peter Bright got caught on an app dedicated to these degenerate fetishes. The FBI doesn't get much right these days but they really hit the jackpot in their kiddy diddler hunt by looking in degenerate fetish communities.
It's because autistic people know something is off about themselves which gives troomers an opening to convince them that transing themselves is the solution to all their problems in life. It's similar to how they try to convince non-autistic teens going through normal teenage problems that transing themselves is the solution to all their problems in life. Notice a pattern here? The situation with autistics is just that on steroids.
The reason is that autistic people get fixated on and obsessed with something. When groomers fixate them on gender, they can get into a self-destructive loop. The general sense of discomfort that autists feel also helps.
Just take a look at the number of times they just openly put it out in their profiles "autistic polyam trans she/they"
The transsexual population includes both predators and victims. Even if the victims of abuse are more prone to become abusers in the future, I oppose your stance that we should kill them all, groomer and groomed alike.
I only advocate it for the groomed if they groom others. The ones who don't continue the abuse need the help of places like r/detrans, which the troomers are trying to destroy. I just don't include that caveat every time I post this because it comes off as a leftist listing all the exceptions to not be offensive.
The autogynephilia subset of Gender Dysphoria is filled to the brim with pedos.
( The other subset are effeminate gay dudes who believe they would have been better-off as women and delude themselves they were ment to be one.
Those two subsets have different pecularities in their brains. The autogynephiles have typical male brians except in one area that is tied to paraphilias, including pedophilia. Who could have guessed! )
It's still sexual with the gay ones as evidenced by the fact they get off trying to trap men. But I am willing to believe it's something other than AGP with them since Blanchard's study was the only honest attempt to understand troonery.
🙄
Something tells me that this was a based title-writer trying his best to make a redpill out of this title.
Otherwise, he could have just written "HER daughter".
Or they're so far gone that they think it's important to normalize the phrase 'she fathered' .
That part confused me. Usually the gendered language is either completely based or completely cucked. I don't think I've ever seen the half and half stuff that they did in this article.
It might be, and this is just a guess, that woke journalists are actually just retarded and there wasn't any programming for this particular instance.
Thank God they respect the gender of the child pornographer.
I hate this fucking timeline
Look on the bright side.
God will burn everything with holy fire.
Hopefully he doesn't live that long in prison.
It's NJ. They'll put him in the woman's prison where he can continue his sex crime spree. At least he won't be around children.
Nah, we should just publicly execute child porn producers.
Saves having to feed them and risking them escaping.
It's the same argument regardless of which female space they're invading at the moment. They say they're not safe in the male space. It's bullshit but if you pretend that the fears legitimately exist there are solutions that don't involve them invading female spaces. Single stall gender neutral bathrooms, special sections in male prisons, etc. Those solve the "we don't feel safe in male spaces" problem. What they don't solve in the "we want to perv on and rape women in their spaces" problem these troons actually have.
He'll just be making new ones
EVERY.
FUCKING.
TIME.
Mexicans do come up often in child rape cases. It's so strange.
"woman" "she"
No, this is a dude who decided he wants to be a woman. The masculine pronouns are correct. They did a hell of a job mixing up the gendered language though as AoV pointed out.
I know. I was referring to the article itself, wherein the author decided to play along with the mutant's charade. Playing pretend is for children and actors. Mentally ill predators do not deserve that luxury.
Unless it's 25 years before the body is removed from the tree that is insufficient.
25 years? why not just immediately taken out back and shot like the dog he is?
From the article:
Just how "supportive" is too supportive?
I mean, they're defending a dude who who forced his 7 year old daughter to star in a kiddy porn film he was directing/producing. So this level of support qualifies. We all know he wouldn't have gotten that defense if he wasn't a troon.
He should get eternity.
In Hell.
Woodchipper, feet first.
Should have gotten a punt gun to the back of the head.
It's almost as if it's a bad idea to let bad people roam free.
Should have been send into a wood chipper, feet first
Really? 25 years and not 25 bullets?
If it was a woman, she wouldn't have got 25 months. This case proves trans women are not women, because women get away with this kind of thing.
Anyway, good to see a criminal locked up.
I thought the Dulcinea character might be an actual woman, but HOLY HELL then I saw the picture. It would be enough to cure Don Quixote.
All four in this case are men.
troomers give kids drugs, nuff said
This is before they publicly hang it, right?
Pedophilia is also a keystone to antifascism. Wilhelm Reich's 1933 book, The Mass Psychology of Fascism, lays out that fascism is caused by not sexualizing children, somehow. This was best put into practice by Dr Kentler in Germany who intentionally put foster children with convicted pedophiles.
Where are you getting this from? Primary or secondary source? It sounds outlandish even by the standards of the far-left. Even leftists would have driven you out of town if you advocated for sexualizing kids in the 1930s.
Really? Arthur Bryant's Unfinished Victory talks about how child prostitutes were rampant in Weimar Berlin, and it was considered a mark of their democratic freedom. Then there was the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft, which is no different from the current tranny kid stuff going on. Weimar leftists were out of control. A lot of the films burned by Nazis were child porn.
It is true as far as I can tell from the original (translated) source. It was written in 1933 by a Jewish Austrian Psychologist (also communist and pedophile), and was after Hitler's Mein Kampf, with several direct responses to the work. He was very influential and helped lay down the foundations for Psychology a hundred years ago. He came directly after Freud, was a direct disciple of Freuds, was director of a major Freud clinic, and worked with Freud's children after Freud's passing. He was also (like all psychologists) a complete fraud and he believed in molesting children and that 'orgone energy' from orgasms could cure cancer.
Eg, the first hit for 'child' reads that sex and child sex is important in communism, and the only reason Marx didn't know about it is because sexology is just invented.
If you repress children (ie, don't groom them) they become repressed right wing fascists. Mind that this is Freud era psychology, so it truly believes that however a child is raised is how they are.
The entire work continues this way really. There's hundreds of references to children, and the majority are about how sexual grooming/masturbation/molestation is good because it keeps them from becoming too Fascist. Grooming is inherently Jewish Bolshevism Revolutionary and cannot be adopted by fascists, therefore they must groom children. (Note: The call out is because Reich uses a particular meaning for "revolutionary" and "fascist", which does not match up with modern usage. He instead means the political blocks, "fascist" is particularly Hitler's movement; "revolutionary" is particularly international Jewish Bolshevism.)
The most direct statement I found from reading his work is this, which is one of the current and very influential lines of thinking for LGBT groomers. This is what they're trying to make into a reality today: mandatory grooming by law.
Literally thinking that he's part of the good guys because he molests and grooms kids.
This is what we still see today. You barely have to change the wording, and it's clear that they still believe all this. They've just gotten smart enough to not say it out loud as much.
psychology is just the fuckin bastard acupunct of medicine, isnt it
Probably ConPro.
I read books like the ones I referenced here, particularly those written before WW2 since that is when the current regime's narrative control starts.
then you should be quote the chapters of this ancient book, instead of a broad comment of its contents. is it even purchasable in 2020?
I don't carry around stacks of books while shitposting on my phone. Is the modern era really considered ancient now?
https://www.amazon.com/Mass-Psychology-Fascism-Wilhelm-Reich/dp/0374508844
Even when you get their defenders to admit these stories are happening they'll say "See it proves the existing laws are already working!"
Because the existence of criminals in a class of people doesn't prove they're all bad.
If you think it does, go join the feminists demanding mass genocide of males because 0.1% or less are rapists.
Most people who are trans now are young people who are victims of a sick culture.
Aren't you always citing bad women to prove that women are all bad?
And now your logic suddenly doesn't apply because you are inordinately fond of troons?
No, I cite bad women to prove all women can be bad.
Well, if we're being consistent, the people making that argument should be banned for R16 like I am thanks to my ConPro fanbase.
Congratulations that you belatedly understand the reality of man's fallen nature, and that we are all bad.
Consistency can also go the other way.
Can I even be banned more often than I already am?
At least the bans are consistent?
And it won't stop until we start dealing with the troomers who tell anxious and confused minors that mutilating themselves is the one and only path to happiness. The grooming victims deserve help, like any other victim does provided they don't victimize others. But once they decide that dragging others into the hole they're in is preferable to trying to get out they deserve the woodchipper just like their own groomers.
Most of the people pushing it are biological "cisgender" women. (fake words go in quotes. For example : "misogyny")
Women out of the schools would have solved this yesterday.
I mean, do it to whoever's doing it. All groomers male or female should be executed on the spot.
You know absolutely no one would support that.
Just look at the whole Disney thing. Female chair of the board, recently hired, everyone in the infamous meeting was female...
Nope, not a word about women's role in this. Here's 90 more BS rants from Republican grifters about women's sports.
Killing pedophiles has overwhelmingly popular support honestly.
Your impression is correct. The clinical jargon for what you're describing is "paraphilias tend to cluster". In laymen's terms, no one has only one disgusting fetish. Transgenderism, beastiality, pedophilia, torture shit, and a ton of other degenerate fetishes almost always come in the same package. It's exceedingly rare for only one to be present. It's really no coincidence that Peter Bright got caught on an app dedicated to these degenerate fetishes. The FBI doesn't get much right these days but they really hit the jackpot in their kiddy diddler hunt by looking in degenerate fetish communities.
Also I read somewhere there's a high link between autism and transgender illness.
Makes you think doesn't it?
It's because autistic people know something is off about themselves which gives troomers an opening to convince them that transing themselves is the solution to all their problems in life. It's similar to how they try to convince non-autistic teens going through normal teenage problems that transing themselves is the solution to all their problems in life. Notice a pattern here? The situation with autistics is just that on steroids.
The reason is that autistic people get fixated on and obsessed with something. When groomers fixate them on gender, they can get into a self-destructive loop. The general sense of discomfort that autists feel also helps.
Just take a look at the number of times they just openly put it out in their profiles "autistic polyam trans she/they"
So they're predators.
Alrighty, time to add some to the wall then.
Too bad they've now decided that those who create kids must also be investigated on the orders of
groomersteachers.The transsexual population includes both predators and victims. Even if the victims of abuse are more prone to become abusers in the future, I oppose your stance that we should kill them all, groomer and groomed alike.
I only advocate it for the groomed if they groom others. The ones who don't continue the abuse need the help of places like r/detrans, which the troomers are trying to destroy. I just don't include that caveat every time I post this because it comes off as a leftist listing all the exceptions to not be offensive.
They are abominations and an affront to God's order.
For that alone they deserve Eternal Death.
At the very least, anyone who is caught forcing children to make porn should be executed
The autogynephilia subset of Gender Dysphoria is filled to the brim with pedos.
( The other subset are effeminate gay dudes who believe they would have been better-off as women and delude themselves they were ment to be one.
Those two subsets have different pecularities in their brains. The autogynephiles have typical male brians except in one area that is tied to paraphilias, including pedophilia. Who could have guessed! )
It's still sexual with the gay ones as evidenced by the fact they get off trying to trap men. But I am willing to believe it's something other than AGP with them since Blanchard's study was the only honest attempt to understand troonery.