"YOUR diversity is OUR strength" -billionaires who have seen the numerous peer-reviewed studies that show 'diversity training' in the workplace increases interpersonal conflict, reduces chances and effectiveness of unionization, and inhibits discourse between employees about wages and benefits.
Sweden's PM says what was abundantly clear 10 years ago.
Magdalena Andersson says both Islamism and rightwing extremism have been allowed to fester
And of course she cannot even acknowledge the existence of Islamists without pretending there are 'right wing extremists' to match them.
“Society has been too weak, resources for the police and social services have been too weak.”
Your police don't need resources. They need permission to open fire.
And social services? We all know what that means. It means more welfare. It means more free houses that white men must pay for. It means more bending over to please people who just want to to die so that they can take your land and enslave your women.
They talk about it a bit after every violent uprising from the foreing colonies expanding within their border, then go back to ignoring the growing problem.
It wasn't the integration that failed, it was the immigration policy that imported people who can't be integrated. Integration should only cover skills, not morals: if you want them to redo their driver's test to local standards it's one thing, but if you need to teach them not to rape they should be sent back to die in the hell they created.
This is what you wanted though? If immigrants integrated then you would cease to have "diversity". By nature you must be arguing for parallel societies. Of course, no one could have imagined that people of vastly different cultures and morals living in close proximity would lead to conflict!
people who use that phrase never specify who "us" is.
"YOUR diversity is OUR strength" -billionaires who have seen the numerous peer-reviewed studies that show 'diversity training' in the workplace increases interpersonal conflict, reduces chances and effectiveness of unionization, and inhibits discourse between employees about wages and benefits.
And also reduces efficiency because diversity hires are shit
True, but in most workplaces, it's worth the efficiency cost.
anything that isn't mass deportation is doomed to fail.
If you're feeling charitable sure, but there are other solutions.
What is that other one?
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech (x2)
Comment Removed: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Sweden's PM says what was abundantly clear 10 years ago.
And of course she cannot even acknowledge the existence of Islamists without pretending there are 'right wing extremists' to match them.
Your police don't need resources. They need permission to open fire.
And social services? We all know what that means. It means more welfare. It means more free houses that white men must pay for. It means more bending over to please people who just want to to die so that they can take your land and enslave your women.
They talk about it a bit after every violent uprising from the foreing colonies expanding within their border, then go back to ignoring the growing problem.
Can't they fix it all with more intersectionality?
It wasn't the integration that failed, it was the immigration policy that imported people who can't be integrated. Integration should only cover skills, not morals: if you want them to redo their driver's test to local standards it's one thing, but if you need to teach them not to rape they should be sent back to die in the hell they created.
White girls tired of brown dick. Time to deport.
The obvious solution is more immigration to the point that Swedes become 15% of the population. Problem solved.
This is what you wanted though? If immigrants integrated then you would cease to have "diversity". By nature you must be arguing for parallel societies. Of course, no one could have imagined that people of vastly different cultures and morals living in close proximity would lead to conflict!
A couple of 'em must have "culturally enriched" the wrong targets.