A window in to the evil that is the trans grooming movement
(cutdowntree.substack.com)
Comments (51)
sorted by:
Holy smokes
Still don't believe me when I say the pathology of our culture towards men caused this?
Blood on their hands. Not as if it would bother them.
Oh I believe you. It’s why I’m not wasting time with western women or western society.
The thought of becoming the kind of man that would stop those things never occurred to it.
Also, none of those things ever happened.
Oh shit
ROTFLMAO! Fuck these faggots. I'm autistic and gay. The reason so many of these people are transitioning is because they were nothing and nobodies. Too weak and fragile to stand up, let alone on their own. They embraced this insanity without doing any real research because it was the current growing trend among edgy outcasts. In my life I have considered many possibilities and discarded most of them as they do not have any bearing upon my life. Self-reflection is something these trans-trenders lack, thus, even when they realize they've gone down the wrong path, will seek to blame everything but their own lack of will for why they are worthless mistakes in a mutilated body.
Trans people are real, it's a proven diagnosis. But this movement, this trend, it has nothing to do with that and I enjoy every minute of watching these people destroy themselves.
A diagnosis that was invented by a pedophile. Not for a single second do I think that they actually exist.
I don't care what you believe. There's enough scientific evidence to draw a conclusion that some people are chemically different enough from their biological sex, but similar to the opposite sex that trans is real.
That's bullshit. Experts are just credentialed individuals who agree with the regime. And when you actually drill down on the science it generally doesn't actually match what "the experts" say.
One study that is widely quoted (and probably the one you are thinking of) shows that brain scans of MtF are closer to females than males are and contrariwise. They try to portray this as scans of MtF are more similar to females than males, but that isn't the case. On the PCA the centroid of the MtFs are 5% away from the centroid of males and 95% from the centroid of females and completely overlapped by males.
So if you were given a point that was an unlabeled and it was an MtF you'd be best off guessing male. Put another way you could easily separate males and MtFs (which is to say other males) from females and FtMs (which is to say other females), but you couldn't separate MtFs from males or FtMs from females.
The actual conclusion one should take from that study is that MtFs are males and FtMs are females. Even the studies author puts the average 5% difference down to neuroplasticity.
Additionally there was a recent study that was widely reported to show "gender affirmation treatment" as being effective for teenagers. The problem with it is that the untreated side of the study had like 90% attrition, so the study couldn't show anything either way. They didn't even try to explain the attrition; they just ignored it all together. Maybe they left the study so they could get "girl juice" elsewhere or maybe they naturally desisted (as most teenagers do if you leave them alone and don't pump them full of hormones).
The studies will (almost) always support the regime. We saw this with masks and ivermectin. Masks studies always showed a small positive effect within the margin of error. Early on there was that Dutch (I think) study that showed masks didn't work to protect the wearer. It was widely criticized. Funnily it actually shows a small positive effect within the margin of error, but the conclusion was masks don't work. Thereafter any study with a small positive effect within the margin of error would have a conclusion that states masks work well. Even with the effect always being small and positive you can't draw any conclusions because you don't see the studies that aren't published.
IVM was the opposite of masks. Almost all studies (including those used by NIH to conclude IVM doesn't work) showed a strong positive effect but within the margin of error because the studies were always wildly underpowered. But an effect within the margin of error was suddenly not good enough because the science will always agree with the regime.
Climate change. Glyphosates. Anything. The science will always agree with the regime. And the regime will agree with what gives them power (including agreeing with corporations that their wildly profitable products are indeed safe). Remember the 80s food pyramid? Again, the studies actually showed that high carb diets were bad but the conclusions said they were good. It only fell apart because everyone got fat and diabetic. 'Eat the wheat' was the original 'eat the bugs.'
There’s been a lot of discussion about just how rotten the academy is in terms of research. You can’t just trust the papers abstract or conclusions because often enough, either through malice or incompetence, the published data is the opposite of what the authors conclude.
oh god yeah, you had that dutch study on the effectiveness of the vaccine against omicron, and it was showing negative effectiveness after 2 months
In the discussion/conclusion they were clearly forced to come up with excuses for why that was, how it was maybe changed and risky behavior in the vaccinated, and how its still valuable and useful at the current schedule...
I don't know if it's the same study, but the one I saw was pretty similar, and then on top of it admits at the end that the trans people were taking hormones, too. Way to admit your entire study is basically trash because it fails to account for a hugely important factor in your last paragraph, assholes. And yet even with that fundamentally compromising bias in favor of brain difference, their brains were STILL more like their actual gender than their claimed gender.
And the real kicker was that it was cited by a tranny in an argument trying to prove they are real. So god only knows how damaging the studies are that aren't cherry picked by trannies themselves. Or the studies that don't get done at all, or don't get published, because there's a huge bias towards pro-lefties going into the social sciences to begin with, and even the ones that might be tempted to be honest have got to be aware of the fact that trying to execute or publish an anti-trans study might end their career.
Thats hermaphroditism not a mental disorder. Get fucked. Trannys are just MORE degenerate fags.
Hemaphroditism is physically sex characteristics. I'm talking hormones and brain shit. You get fucked, fool.
Yeah hormones have no part in hermaphroditism. Except for everything.
Tell me about your ‘brain shit’ twink? Sounds like the poppers got to you.
Dearest 3rd grade science failing retard,
Hermaphroditism is the presentation of a mixture of male and female genitalia at birth. That is all. If you weren't so retarded, you could grasp the concept behind differences.
Hormone levels and brain development are certainly beyond your comprehension. Just like the knowledge that circuit queens and other sluts are the only ones who use poppers, if they can get them anymore. And, furthermore, I'm a fucking bear.
Dear degenerate semen receptacle, you dont understand that hormones drive the fundamental biologic processes that determine the development and presentation of genitalia. You’re detrimental to your own tribe by way of your ignorant pedagogy and I insist you continue. Congratulations on assuming the equivalent role of fat chick in the homo hierarchy, and adding stupidity to your already low rent calling card.
I'm genuinely curious, is there a study I can read on that? Are there non mental symptoms related to trans? I remember they were saying that there are some brain differences but I thought that was debunked.
I honestly don't remember where it's at anymore. It was in the 90s and 2000s when I still cared about the science of these things. Doing searches on it now only reveals shit that uses CIS-Gender and other woke talking points and isn't reliable. What I can recall is the structure of the brain, the parts more developed in women (as opposed to the development in mens) were similarly developed in gay mens brains and even more developed in those who were trans (born men). Hormones in lesbians and gays were slightly higher, both T and PGT (female T), the hormonal balance was stronger in trans. Leading theory is that exposure to higher levels of hormones, mostly T, during pregnancy lead to higher rates of LGBT people. Maybe it was a sign of bad diet, birth defect, a bad gland, who knows, but it was a real, measurable difference with a spectrum of reliability enough that you could point to someone and be reasonably sure by their hormone levels alone and say "Da gay es hur!"
If a scientific study concluded that troons are lunatics, do you think it would get through peer review or that the researcher would ever get funding again? Can you name even one gender theorist or prominent activist that condemns pedophilia?
Man and woman are forms, as are circles and squares. They are part of the pre-definitional foundation of reality that exists independent of human abstractions. "Adult human female" isn't defining woman, but describing the intersection of sets of forms with common traits. My dog can identify the forms of man and woman, even though he lacks the ability to understand or communicate the concept. To have rationalized away these fundamental truths is to completely detach from reality and descend into the depths of virulent madness.
I don't know what that means, but I don't see how that leads to "trans is real", which almost sounds like an arbitrary judgement call over anything describing reality.
I could be a female and a lesbian, tomboy, uncomfortable with my female body, 100% interested in manly pursuits, lacking any feminine traits or inclinations, yet I'm still a female. "Trans" is a self-applied identity which I would have no interest in adopting. People are certainly free to do so, but that doesn't mean it's science beyond someone writing in a journal describing what "trans" people are like. Yet leftists always defer to those journals in place of arguments, so even intelligent young people are left saying "Well it's kinda weird, but I can't argue with science." It's treated as PROVEN. You can't dispute it. This kind of Appeal to Authority and deferral to experts is one of the roots of all the poisonous movements today.
I also think that Chiropracty is a more legitimate school of medicine than Sociology is a legitimate field of science, so I'm biased.
For all the talk about how gender and race are social constructs, the "experts" are the most socially constructed of all.
Perhaps, but there are also people who are "chemically different" enough that they honestly believe that they need limbs amputated to be their true self, or that the government is is implanting radios in their teeth. Perhaps the correct solution is not to indulge in a vain attempt to chase physical impossibilities.
Yes, and those people are called skzoids.
This is also part of the reason why they pushed so hard to teach CRT to children. Pump them full of guilt and give them the chance of redemption through becoming a tranny.
There's a little overlap, but CRT is a trend in an of itself. It's pushed by black supremacists mainly while transtrenders is pushed mostly by white women.
The redemption through (trend) is always how these groups function. It's culting 101.
You do realize that they're both the results of Critical Theory, right?
Hardly.
Are you being serious?
You've been here how long and you don't know the history of Critical Theory and the "social sciences?"
HA! We didn't invite anyone. Groups merged. The first movements were Gays, then reluctantly, Gays and Lesbians. It was the Lesbians who made it LG instead of GLB. The T appeared about the same time it went mainstream and most gays were done with the bullshit because the screeching fairies were the ones anyone wanted to talk about or with in the media. God, I can still see the fucking online bitching of lisping queens asking "Why won't gay men date femmes?" Because gay men want men, not women in men's bodies or men trying to be women!
I support the rights of people to do their own thing, but when you try to force anyone to do something they didn't sign up for, then you can go fuck yourself.
It also kind of looks like a slow, long-game hijacking of the original Rainbow Coalition, right down to its imagery.
That's women and fags for you.
No one liked the T but it got lumped together to increase the numbers, also G and L rarely mingle in real life. One thing I noticed is how many Ls are feminists and hate men in general, they may not be outspoken about Gs but they do seem to not like them.
It is more like a game of thrones sort of alliance.
Oh holy fuck is that true in the community. The ugly dykes and the flaming queers are gasoline and fire. Beautifully mixed if you want explosions or trannyportation.
In my work life, my favorite person to work with is a black lesbian. But she's a normal person, married and a hard worker. The dykadelic lesbo, holy fuck. No. Just no.
Again, this is where we're missing someone like Shirley McLean who can help lead them to the "Sometimes reincarnation fucks up, and you just have to deal with the hand you're dealt" conclusion.
Exactly. Better to be a mild-looking man than a butt-ugly woman.
I smell Gnosticism; it smells like heresy.
I think you are a bit harsh, I can't but feel sorry for them. I was a stupid and impressionable teenager myself and did do stupid shit because I wanted to have friends. Nothing as major as what this guy but I can see how if you do not have a strong will power you can get manipulated in to doing or believing things that you would not normally. For me, this are the victims of this trans agenda grooming and they got to him young. As a gay guy if someone would try to manipulate you like that when you are like 23-24 you would be the shit out of them but kids can be to easily manipulated.
I was nearly run over in the school parking lot twice for being different. That was the least of the shit I endured for being an atheist. When they thought I was gay and then my brother came to stay with us, well, then it got a shit tonne worse. I didn't join any stupid fucking trend, I told them to fuck off. Weakness is what leads to groups of morons thinking it's okay to hurt someone they disagree with.
You are a bad ass and that helped you but this guy and lots like him are not and they are now victims. This guy is not even gay, he is just a guy that was confused and was bombarded by propaganda on how he is evil for being a white male, he also had no friends, autism and anxiety. He was the perfect pray for this new trans loonies.
I am not a badass, I had no choice but to survive. I had everything he did, except I had a backbone. I had constant propaganda, constant threats, constant negative reinforcement. People put too much emphasis on disabilities, letting them get away with things because they are different. Long before I heard anything about autism, let alone knew I had it, I had parents telling me to cut that stupid shit out, act right, act normal, pay attention when people are talking to you.
I agree, he was the perfect prey because these people like him are perfect prey for any scam. He was a gullible moron. The perfect patsy. It's not the literal mindedness of autism (fuck do I know this one), it's being a smooth-brained fool who decided to sit there like a lump rather than explore his world. You can't be prepared to dismiss or accept anything you hear/read unless you are mentally active. A mind without curiosity is the key to all troubles.
Schoolchildren are a bunch of malevolent shits and always have been (See "Lord of the Flies"). Anyone who dares to be himself has always been a target. But now the Libs of Tik Tok types and their identity politics have entered the snake pit to exploit kids in furtherance of their twisted social-engineering movement of "liberation." I only hope that the majority of kids these days see things for what they are and have enough support at home to get through high school alive and reasonably sane.
This is the new-christian movement. They moved on from being saved by Jesus to being saved by being woke.