Well, i am with him, somewhat. I, too, think he should not defend himself when someone inevitably wants to punch him. Macron, that is. I also think he should prohibited from having bodyguards or any other protection.
The correct response is to say that you shot the person, and they no longer need to come.
Then when cops show up in five minutes, interrupting the crime, and ask: "Didn't you say you shot him?" You reply: "Didn't you say nothing can be done?"
I would imagine if you live in one of the rural flyover states like Kansas or Nebraska or Montana that the cops could be several hours drive away. Some of our rural counties here in England the police would probably be an hour away. Rural crime is a big problem because criminals know they can get away with it. Some of our rural police forces like Devon & Cornwall police for example are completely and utterly incompetent and lurch from crisis to crisis.
in France, crime statistics have been banned to hide the fact that 99.9% of the prison population is black or arab. People know the percentage is high but they have no idea it's almost NOTHING but immigrants.
The elites want the public dependent on the government for protection
You say this like they intend to protect the public. They just want to be able to control them, without fear of revolution. If they wanted to protect the public they wouldn't be mass importing muslims for one thing.
The only ones they're trying to protect are the criminals. Anarcho-tyranny doesn't work if the criminals are too afraid to break the law. It's one thing to get let off by a corrupt DA, but it's another thing entirely to get killed by the person they were trying to attack. Even the most corrupt of judges can't do necromancy.
Any normie liberal who's still on the party line hates you too. They think they're high class and loook down on the poors, even if relatively they are too.
shortly after the shooting, the three other suspected burglars dropped off the victim, a native of Serbia, in front of the emergency room before fleeing by car.
Basically how it works in South Africa. When it comes to murder or justifiable homicide the police are pretty much just there to fill in the paperwork - either stage the scene to make it easier, dump the unregistered weapon you did it with and run or bury the body. A friend of mine popped two random vagrants who wouldn't back the fuck up from him one day with an unregistered weapon and an old lady came out the house and told him to give her the gun and she would cop to it. They didn't even bother trying to prosecute her.
If mainland Europe becomes lawless enough you'll get a booming private security industry like South Africa as well. Generally speaking if you're in trouble anyone with money will call armed response from their security provider and not the police. You don't have to wait half an hour for them to respond.
It is pathetic laws like this that make me want the Ukranian war to spread to the rest of Europe. I want to be armed like they have been. Machine guns and anti-armor rockets flowing freely.
Well, i am with him, somewhat. I, too, think he should not defend himself when someone inevitably wants to punch him. Macron, that is. I also think he should prohibited from having bodyguards or any other protection.
The correct response is to say that you shot the person, and they no longer need to come.
Then when cops show up in five minutes, interrupting the crime, and ask: "Didn't you say you shot him?" You reply: "Didn't you say nothing can be done?"
Right. Saying you shot the person would be a lie, false report, etc.
There's an ugly truth at play: the police have the resources to respond to a shooting (like you defending your property) not a robbery. Go figure.
"I said I shouted at him, not shot at him. Get your hearing-impaired diversity hire off the phone lines!"
oooo nice recovery
Still better than being shot by the burglar.
In the wise words of the rap "Fake Woke", call a pizza, call the cops, see what reaches you first.
Based Tom MacDonald fan
I would imagine if you live in one of the rural flyover states like Kansas or Nebraska or Montana that the cops could be several hours drive away. Some of our rural counties here in England the police would probably be an hour away. Rural crime is a big problem because criminals know they can get away with it. Some of our rural police forces like Devon & Cornwall police for example are completely and utterly incompetent and lurch from crisis to crisis.
in France, crime statistics have been banned to hide the fact that 99.9% of the prison population is black or arab. People know the percentage is high but they have no idea it's almost NOTHING but immigrants.
If necessary.
Will this affect his popularity in the presidential election? What do French people think?
The elites want the poor to be unarmed and at risk.
The elites want the public dependent on the government for protection
The elites want the public not able to defend themselves from the elites
You say this like they intend to protect the public. They just want to be able to control them, without fear of revolution. If they wanted to protect the public they wouldn't be mass importing muslims for one thing.
They want them dependent on the government for protection, it does not necessarily follow that the government will be providing it.
The only ones they're trying to protect are the criminals. Anarcho-tyranny doesn't work if the criminals are too afraid to break the law. It's one thing to get let off by a corrupt DA, but it's another thing entirely to get killed by the person they were trying to attack. Even the most corrupt of judges can't do necromancy.
That’s not necessarily true. Look at what we ended up with. Not saying they aren’t pozzed over there, but you never know how deep this shit is.
as if the votes matter in elections anymore (if they ever did)
Tony Martin all over again.
Any normie liberal who's still on the party line hates you too. They think they're high class and loook down on the poors, even if relatively they are too.
https://archive.ph/0E3uN Translation by DeepL:
If the system is incapable of rendering justice, people will make their own. Criminalizing self-defense will not get rid of it.
It'll just make the "Shoot, shovel, and shut up" approach more popular...
Basically how it works in South Africa. When it comes to murder or justifiable homicide the police are pretty much just there to fill in the paperwork - either stage the scene to make it easier, dump the unregistered weapon you did it with and run or bury the body. A friend of mine popped two random vagrants who wouldn't back the fuck up from him one day with an unregistered weapon and an old lady came out the house and told him to give her the gun and she would cop to it. They didn't even bother trying to prosecute her.
If mainland Europe becomes lawless enough you'll get a booming private security industry like South Africa as well. Generally speaking if you're in trouble anyone with money will call armed response from their security provider and not the police. You don't have to wait half an hour for them to respond.
macuck
farmer's body count should have been 4/4.
Strangely enough this is the creepiest line in there:
Get stuft, Micron.
It is pathetic laws like this that make me want the Ukranian war to spread to the rest of Europe. I want to be armed like they have been. Machine guns and anti-armor rockets flowing freely.
I'm absolutely outraged about what this farmer did to!
He missed 3 burglars!
Who taught him how to shoot?!!
The phrase "Cheese eating surrender monkey" exists for a reason.
He means he likes to get pegged.
Yes, we know. That's why the French military wrote that letter warning that your treasonous support for France's enemies might start a civil war.
self defense is considered competition to the state in france, the admin will destroy you if you dare fight back against the scum.
The french werent always know to be cheese eating surrender monkeys.
that's why french tanks have rearview mirrors