i searchd out that site. there looks like 110+ young global leaders. What are the indications that she is doing their bidding? Besides taking down their girl Kamala
The Americans destroyed a huge arsenal of Ukrainian (nuclear and also other strategic) weapons in 1994-2001. Nothing is going to make for such kind of a loss unless he sends the replacement nukes, which he won't.
Because it’s about stopping someone hell bent on rebuilding an empire here today because it will cost a lot more lives and treasure to do so tomorrow. And Putin has said consistently for the last 20+ years that he felt allowing the Soviet States to declare independence was a mistake. This includes not only Ukraine, but the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Putins long term plan is to reabsorb those states as well. It’s why they so quickly went to join the EU and NATO. They knew from history that the Russia of the 90’s was temporary and that a new Russian strongman would come around and conquer them yet again.
We also bear the burden of the fact we were the ones who talked the Ukrainians out of their nuclear weapons and strategic arsenal in exchange for security guarantee we failed to honor back in 2014.
I know it’s popular to side with Putin on here, but this who the man really is. He wants to go down in history as a modern Peter the Great who rebuilt a new Russian Empire.
Last time there was unchecked aggression in Europe the cost was at least 50 Million lives and a continent destroyed. If you don't think you'll feel the repercussions of that..
Once a country starts gaining advantage through invading other countries, they keep doing it. New invasion every few years.
This has applied to a huge number of countries, including the us, japan, china, it goes on and on and on. It's kinda like the country gets addicted to invading or something.
because its the right thing for us to defend their liberty. that doesnt necessitate an armed response... if this govt wasnt full on incompetent diplomatically, that is. hopefully it doesnt come to that- but they are certainly using it to drump up their midterms effect like craven faggards
Is Biden's (well his puppeteer's) plan to start a war at the end of his term because wartime presidents usually get reelected so voter fraud will be even more obfuscated this time around?
While I do agree with you I do not understand why did she not get institutional support.
The left-wing media turned on her the second she attacked Hillary and I do not think her party liked her very much after destroying / telling the truth about that hyena of a Vice President. I'm also noticing that the 2 she attacked are both feminists.
Maybe she is set up as a fail-safe of sorts, in case the narrative crumbles they can move her as an alternative?
or maybe another naieve person thinking they could accept an award without knowing the history of it. I dont see any evidence besides 'not trusting politicians' to prove her unworthy in the thread.
WEF Young Global Leader, Tulsi Gabbard
i searchd out that site. there looks like 110+ young global leaders. What are the indications that she is doing their bidding? Besides taking down their girl Kamala
I don’t trust any politician. Especially those who are listed on the WEF website as being future leaders. Snakes in the grass.
How did you prove that she is working to their ends? Not trusting politicians is more of an opinion than evidence of what you're implying
WEF and anti-2A, Tulsi simply cannot be trusted, IMO. Support her at your own peril.
The Americans destroyed a huge arsenal of Ukrainian (nuclear and also other strategic) weapons in 1994-2001. Nothing is going to make for such kind of a loss unless he sends the replacement nukes, which he won't.
free gun AND free crack pipe, what a country.
Suka blyat. Cheeki breeki! chugs Stoli
She tries to talk like opposition, but she votes like a party parrot. Always check the records. She's a faker.
If we're lucky it will end with all of our leaders getting publicly hanged for treason.
Because it’s about stopping someone hell bent on rebuilding an empire here today because it will cost a lot more lives and treasure to do so tomorrow. And Putin has said consistently for the last 20+ years that he felt allowing the Soviet States to declare independence was a mistake. This includes not only Ukraine, but the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Putins long term plan is to reabsorb those states as well. It’s why they so quickly went to join the EU and NATO. They knew from history that the Russia of the 90’s was temporary and that a new Russian strongman would come around and conquer them yet again.
We also bear the burden of the fact we were the ones who talked the Ukrainians out of their nuclear weapons and strategic arsenal in exchange for security guarantee we failed to honor back in 2014.
I know it’s popular to side with Putin on here, but this who the man really is. He wants to go down in history as a modern Peter the Great who rebuilt a new Russian Empire.
ok, and? russia rebuilding an empire on the literal other side of the planet affects me how?
Last time there was unchecked aggression in Europe the cost was at least 50 Million lives and a continent destroyed. If you don't think you'll feel the repercussions of that..
Most of those lives were Russian. Russia had more causalities in WW II than all other counties combined. They are very sensitive about their borders.
Who cares, that isn't the point.
Once a country starts gaining advantage through invading other countries, they keep doing it. New invasion every few years.
This has applied to a huge number of countries, including the us, japan, china, it goes on and on and on. It's kinda like the country gets addicted to invading or something.
yeah and it wasn't our problem then either
because its the right thing for us to defend their liberty. that doesnt necessitate an armed response... if this govt wasnt full on incompetent diplomatically, that is. hopefully it doesnt come to that- but they are certainly using it to drump up their midterms effect like craven faggards
Tulsi is the only based democrat. you can fight me nibbas
Gabbard is a WEF shill and don't you ever forget it
Hopefully, to avoid the (full scale) war in Europe (by which I mean from here just across a border).
Quite a lofty goal for me.
Is Biden's (well his puppeteer's) plan to start a war at the end of his term because wartime presidents usually get reelected so voter fraud will be even more obfuscated this time around?
While I do agree with you I do not understand why did she not get institutional support. The left-wing media turned on her the second she attacked Hillary and I do not think her party liked her very much after destroying / telling the truth about that hyena of a Vice President. I'm also noticing that the 2 she attacked are both feminists.
Maybe she is set up as a fail-safe of sorts, in case the narrative crumbles they can move her as an alternative?
Tulsi is the WEF choice for when enough people openly reject the establishment neoliberal, far leftist and neocon candidates.
the democrats stopped supporting her after she rekt kamala, did they not?
or maybe another naieve person thinking they could accept an award without knowing the history of it. I dont see any evidence besides 'not trusting politicians' to prove her unworthy in the thread.
i think they also closed her out of the debate by changing the rules... it seems like a direct action after destroying kama (yt)
You've never heard of controlled opposition?
have you looked at politicians lately? many of them look like film villains.
and if pelosi had kids at 16 she'd be a 6th time grandmother now.
Well, she is the only bangable dem. if you can get hard to pelosi or aoc, you might have a masturbation problem