Every piece of information you put out about yourself, you are explicitly asking to be treated differently. Most of the time it's wanting positive treatments, but regardless, you want to be unequal.
ok cunt. go back to yer barbies and irwin memes. oi and that burgeoning fasctist dictatorship you've got going on there under the guise of covid safety. 84 is coming back for aussies before the rest of us.
For example, how do you discriminate against a person you know nothing about? The closest you'll get is idiots obsessed with IdPol trying to put a label on you.
The tried and true method on Reddit involves going through someone's account posting history, sometimes back several years, and then using that to create an identity for someone.
"You once posted in /funny but nothing you say is funny therefore you're a liar and everything you say must therefore be a lie!"
Also, I'm sure most here have seen the resurfaced tweets of that Ebony woman who is some sort of important person at GETTR.
She claims "oh it was 5 years ago when I said Trump's election made me cry at my desk, but I've changed!"
Whether she's changed or not is kind of irrelevant. Never give any time or effort or money (for god's sake) to a company that hires emotional children who a) cry about politics and b) post about crying on social media for fake sympathy points.
I agree this whole fuckin' thing glows like the Elephant's foot at the bottom of Chernobyl surely did.
I'd say controlled opposition makes more sense. A honey pot would want to get a bunch of weirdos saying crazy shit so the feds could PM them and lure them into a fake bombing or something. GETTR seems more like it wants to corral "good" conservatives into one place and control the anti-establishment narrative so it doesn't get too anti-establishment.
I am becoming suspicious of @GETTRofficial as I reached out to them regarding the banning (w/out explanation) of a prominent, controversial user
They said he violated their TOS, but won’t respond to my inquiry of what in their TOS he violated or what post violated it 1/2
I reached out to the banned individual, Nicholas Fuentes, for comment
He said there was no specific post or reason given, just banned w/out explanation just like Twitter does
With financing being from China and similar banning practices to Twitter
I’m not convinced atm
My inquiry was extremely professional and predicated on the basis that the public deserves the right to know @GETTRofficial’s threshold for banning users
Largely in part due to their users joining to avoid the very censorship practices they appear to be implementing
Same job, different boss. I’m only gonna be real with you guys, I’m disappointed because I wanted and currently want this to be our way out of censorship, but it’s not. Anyone promoting @GETTRofficial is grifting or willfully ignorant. Defending banning people is our end
I am now fully learning the Democrat and Chinese connections of @GETTRofficial with only a little, basic research. Also a reminder they are banning people based on political disagreements. This looks really bad. They won’t explain any of this to me via comment.
In Nick's last show he spent almost 2 hours making new accounts and getting banned on gettr while laughing about it, it was pretty epic: https://cozy.tv/nick/replays/2022-01-05
indirectly admitted they ban people based on behavior outside their platform
That shit should be illegal! TOS on these things was always a joke anyway, but if we ever want to rest control from the woke cathedral, we need anti-Cancel laws. A big company, corporation, or anyone offering a "platform" where anyone can sign up should not be able to deny service for anything not directly interfering with the service. (like incessant spamming) Would not apply to small companies or those in an already established contractual business relationship. But it WOULD apply to banks and credit card companies.
I agree that we need anti cancel laws... we should combine them together, in a place where everyone in this country must read and respect them. We could call them... the constition or something, idk
Shadow banning should be illegal in all cases.
And banning should publicly reference an actual law being violate (not a bullshit Twitter made up rule, but an actual state or federal statute that they believe is being violated).
THis, we should have cortering and hanging for all those who would conspire to violate the rights of americans en masse, all of those enlisted in the constituion.
It's easier to delete/ban if you have a power than face the reality, truth, open discussion for proving your opinions and facts. But truth is going to come out eventually, hopefully not too late. Even tho I believe it's 2 years too late
If so, I wouldn't call that a true free speech platform.
No. But you at least won't get censored for what you say & what you write.
Free speech matters, but picking your battles also matters. And anyone thinking of starting a free speech website like 8 Chan was, will have to contend with the Woke & Glowies spamming CP on their site to slander them/get them in legal trouble. I can't necessarily blame anyone for settling for free speaking over free speech by banning porn entirely from their alt tech platform (though yes, I know the owner of Gab is just doing it for Trad Cuck reasons).
I really think that "porn as the ultimate free speech" is a psyop to pit the libertarians who just want to be left alone to be coomers against the honest-to-God conservatives who want to live in a society with standards.
I don't, not at all times, but I don't mind the option. Gab is kinda ok, probably best in terms what you can say, user activity and features, but I just don't believe a "truly free speech platform" would have such limitations. Also you can have simple toggle for users who wish to not see nsfw content (like twitter and flote does).
GETTR glows so bright you can see it from Omicron Persei 8.
All fucking social media glows. It's just a matter of how bright. Seriously, people need to stop fucking doxxing themselves.
The classic "tits or gtfo" explanation.
I've yet to see you call anyone a cunt in a friendly manner or otherwise, so I'm going to press X to doubt.
ok cunt. go back to yer barbies and irwin memes. oi and that burgeoning fasctist dictatorship you've got going on there under the guise of covid safety. 84 is coming back for aussies before the rest of us.
The tried and true method on Reddit involves going through someone's account posting history, sometimes back several years, and then using that to create an identity for someone.
"You once posted in /funny but nothing you say is funny therefore you're a liar and everything you say must therefore be a lie!"
their new strategy is claiming things were posted, that werent. the astroturf subs and heavy handed r*clones share this feature.
RIP Zyzz (he was the sickest cunt there was)
Personal servers and Element is de wae.
If: platform won't permit criticism of jews
Then: controlled opposition and/or honeypot
It's really that simple. It doesn't matter whether you're an anti-semite or an "anti-semite", this simple proof clearly works.
Everyone else gets criticism. They should grow a thicker skin and deal with it the way the rest of us do.
Your obsession with Jews is as annoying as an SJW obsession with whites.
Also, I'm sure most here have seen the resurfaced tweets of that Ebony woman who is some sort of important person at GETTR.
She claims "oh it was 5 years ago when I said Trump's election made me cry at my desk, but I've changed!"
Whether she's changed or not is kind of irrelevant. Never give any time or effort or money (for god's sake) to a company that hires emotional children who a) cry about politics and b) post about crying on social media for fake sympathy points.
I agree this whole fuckin' thing glows like the Elephant's foot at the bottom of Chernobyl surely did.
Her actual name was ebony. And she isn't black.
plot twist
I would, except she's white.
LOL. What a stupid term that guy used.
Can you say Honey Pot?
I'd say controlled opposition makes more sense. A honey pot would want to get a bunch of weirdos saying crazy shit so the feds could PM them and lure them into a fake bombing or something. GETTR seems more like it wants to corral "good" conservatives into one place and control the anti-establishment narrative so it doesn't get too anti-establishment.
Fair enough, but if that's their goal I'd say they've missed the boat.
Why not both?
Elijah's earlier tweets about Nick on Jan 4: https://twitter.com/ElijahSchaffer/status/1478414774396506114
I am becoming suspicious of @GETTRofficial as I reached out to them regarding the banning (w/out explanation) of a prominent, controversial user
They said he violated their TOS, but won’t respond to my inquiry of what in their TOS he violated or what post violated it 1/2
I reached out to the banned individual, Nicholas Fuentes, for comment
He said there was no specific post or reason given, just banned w/out explanation just like Twitter does
With financing being from China and similar banning practices to Twitter
I’m not convinced atm
My inquiry was extremely professional and predicated on the basis that the public deserves the right to know @GETTRofficial’s threshold for banning users
Largely in part due to their users joining to avoid the very censorship practices they appear to be implementing
https://twitter.com/ElijahSchaffer/status/1478857799857848328
https://twitter.com/ElijahSchaffer/status/1478859391394844672
In Nick's last show he spent almost 2 hours making new accounts and getting banned on gettr while laughing about it, it was pretty epic: https://cozy.tv/nick/replays/2022-01-05
"How To Kill Your Platform In It's Crib" basically.
RIP GRIFTRR.
That shit should be illegal! TOS on these things was always a joke anyway, but if we ever want to rest control from the woke cathedral, we need anti-Cancel laws. A big company, corporation, or anyone offering a "platform" where anyone can sign up should not be able to deny service for anything not directly interfering with the service. (like incessant spamming) Would not apply to small companies or those in an already established contractual business relationship. But it WOULD apply to banks and credit card companies.
The fact that you are talking about changing laws in this way shows that you have no idea how fucked you are.
I agree that we need anti cancel laws... we should combine them together, in a place where everyone in this country must read and respect them. We could call them... the constition or something, idk
GETTR is pretty trash IMHO.
Gab is way better.
Minds seems good too.
Minds s alright, the UI kind of sucks.
Gab is pretty solid, has a lot of potential. It also provides a video platform which is a plus.
If it wasn't obvious why gab's apps got banned everywhere while gettr's apps are perfectly fine in both big app stores, i don't know what to tell you.
Shadow banning should be illegal in all cases. And banning should publicly reference an actual law being violate (not a bullshit Twitter made up rule, but an actual state or federal statute that they believe is being violated).
THis, we should have cortering and hanging for all those who would conspire to violate the rights of americans en masse, all of those enlisted in the constituion.
Getter is just another twatter, always has been.
So how are they any different? The shilling for them is ridiculous.
I can’t stand this “behavior outside platform” thing. It’s always political. Imagine if it becomes the norm for banks, phone service, etc.
I almost hope it does so we can just bifurcate already. Separate society is the only solution imo.
This probably explains why I've never heard of it prior to this week.
Its been around much longer than that. It was and still is a small player in the field.
NO! Fuck. Really?!?! Never would have guessed.
Lmao. Gettr is such a Grift. Conservative INC is laughing to the bank.
It's easier to delete/ban if you have a power than face the reality, truth, open discussion for proving your opinions and facts. But truth is going to come out eventually, hopefully not too late. Even tho I believe it's 2 years too late
Anything against the narrative is hate speech or violates “community standards”. What a joke.
Thank God for the openness of the web or this would be a lot harder.
Isn't Gab banning for anime and porn? If so, I wouldn't call that a true free speech platform.
No, just porn.
No. But you at least won't get censored for what you say & what you write.
Free speech matters, but picking your battles also matters. And anyone thinking of starting a free speech website like 8 Chan was, will have to contend with the Woke & Glowies spamming CP on their site to slander them/get them in legal trouble. I can't necessarily blame anyone for settling for free speaking over free speech by banning porn entirely from their alt tech platform (though yes, I know the owner of Gab is just doing it for Trad Cuck reasons).
'its okay, its only censorship of things we don't like"
Not sure if you know this, but there’s porn on the rest of the internet. One website that you can’t quick share coom clips won’t break the internet.
Why do you need porn in your face at all times? Go to a porn site for that.
I really think that "porn as the ultimate free speech" is a psyop to pit the libertarians who just want to be left alone to be coomers against the honest-to-God conservatives who want to live in a society with standards.
It is free speech, though. The desire to censor it cause we don't like it is not very different from the sjws trying to censor titties in gaming.
I don't, not at all times, but I don't mind the option. Gab is kinda ok, probably best in terms what you can say, user activity and features, but I just don't believe a "truly free speech platform" would have such limitations. Also you can have simple toggle for users who wish to not see nsfw content (like twitter and flote does).