This is a setup. #jailFauci has been trending on Twitter for over 10 hours. There’s no way they would let that stay up for so long normally. When you view the hashtag it shows hundreds of posts about the dogs. They’re going to use this somehow, probably later today, and definitely to dodge the Wuhan virus research being connected to him
Has PETA responded to this revelation at all? I wouldn't be surprised if they said "Those animals died heroically to save millions of people who would surely have died from covid."
Glad someone else is aware of her. She’s tied to Ben Shapiro and everyone knows that dude is clearly controlled OP. By extension she is just a pawn at bens disposal ie a pawn for the Jews disposal. I don’t trust Candace Owens anymore than any other jogger.
Or he meant what he meant; she engaged in petty and worthless talk but does absolutely nothing for anyone in the big picture. IE: grifter -She promotes her books and her show and beyond that does nothing for any “real change”. She is literally the definition of the word. Why do you want everyone to use the word Nigger so bad? Have some latent racism in ya you just couldn’t wait to project on someone else? Pathetic. Learn the definition of the words you’re using before spouting them off.
When this is true then fauci is a genuine sadist, nothing more, nothing less. This kind op people must manage our health in the right direction... crazy world.
No, I think rules and laws are basically fences for idiots to try and convince them that they can only draw inside the lines of life and it generally works pretty well.
Al Capone was based as fuck for running liquor. He was also ethically negative for killing people. I can like him for one thing and dislike the other.
I imagine I've heard your arguments before, just as I'm sure you've heard mine, yes.
No, I think rules and laws are basically fences for idiots to try and convince them that they can only draw inside the lines of life and it generally works pretty well.
That's true, particularly when looking at laws and rules as tools rather than ethical standards. But then you're advocating using that tool in a manner that doesn't achieve the goal, basically "It's better to use shovels and weeks to dig the ditch rather than a plow and ten minutes, because shovels are for ditches and plows are for fields."
Al Capone was based as fuck for running liquor.
I understand what you mean about not judging someone based solely on one quality or feat. Over all if I have to choose between getting my drink on, but at the cost of the Valentine Day massacre two speakeasies over... I'd rather just stay dry.
Which interestingly enough is a choice I've already made, for significantly smaller reasons.
Monkeys are still used for behavioural studies relating to humanity. Heck. Even mice behavioral studies have led to very prophetic looks into human nature (Look up NIMH's mouse city experiments. The paralells with modern society are chilling, especially with regards to sexuality.) This should still raise some very concerned eyebrows.
The mouse utopia's most troubling result to me, above all the eerily similar physical and behavioral problems to what sedentary humans often experience, was the rather abrupt collapse and extinction of the mice population.
They just stopped having babies.
All the other problems can eventually be solved untill extinction of a population. At that point that population is gone forever.
Looking at some human ethnic groups with a birth rate so low each generation shrinks by half, this needs solving really fast, otherwise there will be several dozens of extinctions of humanity's genetic subpopulations in a few generations.
That's called dysgenics, which amplifies negative traits. Eugenics amplifies positive traits. It can be argued that it's subjective based upon the views of the one doing it, but objectively there are positive traits and negative traits.
If wealth and power are considered positive traits, then yes, this is eugenics. Next time you watch Bill Gates interview, watch carefully when he talks about overpopulation in the poor countries, watch him smile in glee when he talks about “gaming out pandemic scenarios” that have a high fatality rate among the poor. These guys enjoy the idea of culling our population, and they love that we’re just going along with it.
Except they're doing it to everyone, not just the poor. Just because they view everyone else with contempt, to justify the evils they do against us, doesn't mean their actions are objectively good, or their reasons and pursuits in eugenics is objectively good.
Also, I was more replying to the OP's post, since they were musing about the possibility of instilling more fear into the vaccinated, which isn't a positive trait.
Thats some Batman villian shit
You don't have to like Candace Owens to realize how unethical and deranged this type of experiment is.
Fauci is a complete monster regardless of which metric you use to judge him by.
This is a setup. #jailFauci has been trending on Twitter for over 10 hours. There’s no way they would let that stay up for so long normally. When you view the hashtag it shows hundreds of posts about the dogs. They’re going to use this somehow, probably later today, and definitely to dodge the Wuhan virus research being connected to him
Fauci is an idiot to have agreed to become the face of the plandemic. Doesn't take a genius to figure out he'd be a fallguy if shit goes south
Has PETA responded to this revelation at all? I wouldn't be surprised if they said "Those animals died heroically to save millions of people who would surely have died from covid."
Attack the person not the content is low IQ.
How do we know they didn't use humans though...
Blind trust that the current "they" aren't just like all the previous "they"s?
Glad someone else is aware of her. She’s tied to Ben Shapiro and everyone knows that dude is clearly controlled OP. By extension she is just a pawn at bens disposal ie a pawn for the Jews disposal. I don’t trust Candace Owens anymore than any other jogger.
Ngl it's been annoying seeing her fall upwards
You know you can use slurs here. Which is really what you mean by “grifter”.
Or he meant what he meant; she engaged in petty and worthless talk but does absolutely nothing for anyone in the big picture. IE: grifter -She promotes her books and her show and beyond that does nothing for any “real change”. She is literally the definition of the word. Why do you want everyone to use the word Nigger so bad? Have some latent racism in ya you just couldn’t wait to project on someone else? Pathetic. Learn the definition of the words you’re using before spouting them off.
Oh shut it. This isn't reddit if anyone wanted to call her a "nigger" they would.
When this is true then fauci is a genuine sadist, nothing more, nothing less. This kind op people must manage our health in the right direction... crazy world.
If Fauci actually faces consequences because of fucking dogs I will lose my shit. Clown fucking world indeed.
As long as the consequences are severe enough, does it matter if the consequences are for the right reasons?
Would it be better if Al Capone never went to jail for murder instead of going to jail for tax evasion?
Yes to both questions.
/edit
Maybe pick a different person because I personally find tax evasion to be something people should be given trophies for.
Then it seems your more interested in people following rules rather than having a just society where the rules are tools and not the goal.
Surely you understand why I have to disagree with your stance on taxes?
Al Capone was based as fuck for running liquor. He was also ethically negative for killing people. I can like him for one thing and dislike the other.
That's true, particularly when looking at laws and rules as tools rather than ethical standards. But then you're advocating using that tool in a manner that doesn't achieve the goal, basically "It's better to use shovels and weeks to dig the ditch rather than a plow and ten minutes, because shovels are for ditches and plows are for fields."
I understand what you mean about not judging someone based solely on one quality or feat. Over all if I have to choose between getting my drink on, but at the cost of the Valentine Day massacre two speakeasies over... I'd rather just stay dry.
Which interestingly enough is a choice I've already made, for significantly smaller reasons.
I don't advocate for using "law" as a tool. I don't know what point you're making here.
I don't drink anymore either, I wouldn't have purchased from Al Capone, but I would have gladly donated for a legal defense fund.
Monkeys are still used for behavioural studies relating to humanity. Heck. Even mice behavioral studies have led to very prophetic looks into human nature (Look up NIMH's mouse city experiments. The paralells with modern society are chilling, especially with regards to sexuality.) This should still raise some very concerned eyebrows.
The mouse utopia's most troubling result to me, above all the eerily similar physical and behavioral problems to what sedentary humans often experience, was the rather abrupt collapse and extinction of the mice population.
They just stopped having babies.
All the other problems can eventually be solved untill extinction of a population. At that point that population is gone forever.
Looking at some human ethnic groups with a birth rate so low each generation shrinks by half, this needs solving really fast, otherwise there will be several dozens of extinctions of humanity's genetic subpopulations in a few generations.
South Korea's fertility index is 0.9
Most European ethnic groups are below 1.6
Minimum for population stability is 2.1
While mice and cats are mammals, making their inner workings incredibly similar, I wonder what's up with bananas.
We know why.
This is eugenics wrapped up in pure sadism. This is not about medicine, it’s about population control.
Notice how no one is doing anything about it at all. Anywhere.
Especially all of these MAGA attorneys and whatnot. Not doing a goddamn thing to stop this.
There’s one thing I am really disappointed in society, which is a total lack of a fail safe to prevent us from spiraling down into totalitarianism.
It seems like we need to relearn this lesion over and over again, and keep forgetting it every fourth or fifth generation into something good.
That's called dysgenics, which amplifies negative traits. Eugenics amplifies positive traits. It can be argued that it's subjective based upon the views of the one doing it, but objectively there are positive traits and negative traits.
If wealth and power are considered positive traits, then yes, this is eugenics. Next time you watch Bill Gates interview, watch carefully when he talks about overpopulation in the poor countries, watch him smile in glee when he talks about “gaming out pandemic scenarios” that have a high fatality rate among the poor. These guys enjoy the idea of culling our population, and they love that we’re just going along with it.
Except they're doing it to everyone, not just the poor. Just because they view everyone else with contempt, to justify the evils they do against us, doesn't mean their actions are objectively good, or their reasons and pursuits in eugenics is objectively good.
Also, I was more replying to the OP's post, since they were musing about the possibility of instilling more fear into the vaccinated, which isn't a positive trait.
I think there’s an actual feminist lurking in our comment section, seeing that downvote.
Could be another antiretardist like me. I don't like people acting retarded without having a medical condition be it feminists or anti-feminists. 👌