That's called dysgenics, which amplifies negative traits. Eugenics amplifies positive traits. It can be argued that it's subjective based upon the views of the one doing it, but objectively there are positive traits and negative traits.
If wealth and power are considered positive traits, then yes, this is eugenics. Next time you watch Bill Gates interview, watch carefully when he talks about overpopulation in the poor countries, watch him smile in glee when he talks about “gaming out pandemic scenarios” that have a high fatality rate among the poor. These guys enjoy the idea of culling our population, and they love that we’re just going along with it.
Except they're doing it to everyone, not just the poor. Just because they view everyone else with contempt, to justify the evils they do against us, doesn't mean their actions are objectively good, or their reasons and pursuits in eugenics is objectively good.
Also, I was more replying to the OP's post, since they were musing about the possibility of instilling more fear into the vaccinated, which isn't a positive trait.
This is eugenics wrapped up in pure sadism. This is not about medicine, it’s about population control.
Hence why our "better halves" are so deeply involved.
Nobody is more sadistic than a feminist with no consequences for her actions.
I think there’s an actual feminist lurking in our comment section, seeing that downvote.
Could be another antiretardist like me. I don't like people acting retarded without having a medical condition be it feminists or anti-feminists. 👌
Notice how no one is doing anything about it at all. Anywhere.
Especially all of these MAGA attorneys and whatnot. Not doing a goddamn thing to stop this.
There’s one thing I am really disappointed in society, which is a total lack of a fail safe to prevent us from spiraling down into totalitarianism.
It seems like we need to relearn this lesion over and over again, and keep forgetting it every fourth or fifth generation into something good.
That's called dysgenics, which amplifies negative traits. Eugenics amplifies positive traits. It can be argued that it's subjective based upon the views of the one doing it, but objectively there are positive traits and negative traits.
If wealth and power are considered positive traits, then yes, this is eugenics. Next time you watch Bill Gates interview, watch carefully when he talks about overpopulation in the poor countries, watch him smile in glee when he talks about “gaming out pandemic scenarios” that have a high fatality rate among the poor. These guys enjoy the idea of culling our population, and they love that we’re just going along with it.
Except they're doing it to everyone, not just the poor. Just because they view everyone else with contempt, to justify the evils they do against us, doesn't mean their actions are objectively good, or their reasons and pursuits in eugenics is objectively good.
Also, I was more replying to the OP's post, since they were musing about the possibility of instilling more fear into the vaccinated, which isn't a positive trait.