The term "trans woman" already does that. If they really were women, they wouldn't need to include "trans".
inb4 someone tries to apply that to "cis"; no, because cis was the default before someone decided to use chiral terms for something completely unrelated and likewise isn't needed to "distinguish" anything because there only are men and women.
Men are male humans. Women are female humans. The terms male and female are not anthropomorphic and apply to every other sexually reproducing, [normally dimorphic] species on the planet. Male fowl are cockerels, females are hens. Chicken technically applies to the dead meat but it's so incorporated as a word these days it also gets used regarding the live species as a whole.
All Keir Starmer has to do to beat Boris is to not be a total and absolute lunatic. That's it. What has happened to the left that even this seems to be beyond its capability?
And he should not say what the hell people should and should not say. Mind your own damn business and shut the hell up.
Trans-women are not women. They're men dressed as women. if that's how they choose to identify, then by all means, do whatever the hell you want; however, I am not — in any conceivable reality — obligated to play along or to cater to your insecurities.
Those who are simply "trying to be their true selves" wouldn't have the need to incessantly run demanding that others cater to their insecurities if that statement were true. They're not trying to simple "be their true selves;" they're seeking validation and affirmation from everyone around them.
One thing I've noticed is that these same people — the overwhelming majority of whom are progressive left activists — who go around making demands of and trying to exert control over others, are only doing so because it's plainly apparent that they lack and meaningful control over themselves and their own lives. Instead of seeking help and trying to learn constructive ways to improve their lives and gain that control, they instead do the opposite: they tear others down in order to build themselves up.
They will never be happy following this path. They'll live in a perpetual present of misery and depression. I suppose this is likely one of the reasons that the trans community's attempted suicide rate is at 50% and over 65% of them have depression. What they're dealing with is mental illness of some form or another. These are people who have given up on themselves; regardless of how they pretend otherwise.
It's one of the reasons I'm absolutely convinced that so many now identify as "trans," "non-binary" or any other goofy make-believe nonsense. They're myopic idiots who were raised by shitty parents that let corporations do the brunt of the work for them by plopping them down in front of a glowing screen or by purchasing whatever consumer product the kid wanted that kept them out of their hair so they could do the things they wanted to do. Why does this make sense? It's actually pretty simple. Within a short amount of time of simply observing or associating with these people, anyone would quickly notice that their beliefs are like some bizarre amalgamation of accumulated stereotypes. Their views on women; on society; on men; on religion; on mental illness; on minorities; on sex; you name it and almost every facet of their lives revolves around consumer manufactured stereotypes. It's not a healthy foundation for any individual to begin with. It's why I'm so adamant that parents should keep all consumption of any type of disposable entertainment/social media, which bombards people with a never-ending stream of shit propaganda, to a strict minimum during a kid's formative years. This isn't just a problem for the trans community either, but many across the more left-leaning spectrum.
The identity politics that these kids have been inculcated with has decimated their core identity. They don't know how to deal with these things and turn to the only thing that's ever provided them with comfort and answers: entertainment/social media. They feel the need to "stand out" because simply being a normal good person isn't what's reflected in the world within the glowing screen that they spend most of their time in. They lack any distinguishing features that would set them apart and make them stand out as individuals, so they decide to appropriate a group identity and focus their entire personal identity around that instead.
I'm sure anyone can follow the line of thought from there. They externalize their "uniqueness" in stupid ways because all of the groups they now center their entire identity around demand intellectual conformity. If you've taken a peek into any progressive community you'll undoubtedly see countless people expressing frustration with the inability to express an opinion without getting dog-piled on because that opinion doesn't conform to the group dogma. Likewise, you'll also see countless others constantly apologizing, giving weird disclaimers to make sure they don't offend, mindlessly spouting random dogmatic activist slogans — you know what I'm talking about.
These people have serious issues. Seeing politicians and media continue to promulgate bullshit narratives to pander to insecure retards is not only absurdly stupid, it's also likely very pernicious to our society as a whole. The funniest part is that all of this was predicted in that link I posted a couple times about the 45 ways Communists would destroy western society. Their methods have undeniably been incredibly effective thus far.
I'll include the link once more for anyone who's interested: https://edberry.com/blog/polymontana/political-platforms/the-45-communist-goals-1963/
This is the leader of the labour party, so we're not there yet, but I won't be surprised if the conservative leader is spouting this drivel before too long.
The big lie (German: große Lüge) is a gross distortion or misrepresentation of the truth, used especially as a propaganda technique.[1][2] The German expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, to describe the use of a lie so colossal that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously."
Only women have cervixes.
Mentally unstable men with infinite time on their hands to monitor reddit will come after you!
#notallmen have cervixes
The term "trans woman" already does that. If they really were women, they wouldn't need to include "trans".
inb4 someone tries to apply that to "cis"; no, because cis was the default before someone decided to use chiral terms for something completely unrelated and likewise isn't needed to "distinguish" anything because there only are men and women.
Men are male humans. Women are female humans. The terms male and female are not anthropomorphic and apply to every other sexually reproducing, [normally dimorphic] species on the planet. Male fowl are cockerels, females are hens. Chicken technically applies to the dead meat but it's so incorporated as a word these days it also gets used regarding the live species as a whole.
It concedes that one doesn't need a cervix to have an opinion on abortion.
No, he's saying FTM transsexuals are men with cervixes, when they are in reality women with cervixes.
All Keir Starmer has to do to beat Boris is to not be a total and absolute lunatic. That's it. What has happened to the left that even this seems to be beyond its capability?
Have you seen the Labour party these days? The utter dregs of humanity. Labour will never win another general election.
Labour have decided that they will beat themselves because they can't seem to beat anyone else right now.
And he should not say what the hell people should and should not say. Mind your own damn business and shut the hell up.
Trans-women are not women. They're men dressed as women. if that's how they choose to identify, then by all means, do whatever the hell you want; however, I am not — in any conceivable reality — obligated to play along or to cater to your insecurities.
Those who are simply "trying to be their true selves" wouldn't have the need to incessantly run demanding that others cater to their insecurities if that statement were true. They're not trying to simple "be their true selves;" they're seeking validation and affirmation from everyone around them.
One thing I've noticed is that these same people — the overwhelming majority of whom are progressive left activists — who go around making demands of and trying to exert control over others, are only doing so because it's plainly apparent that they lack and meaningful control over themselves and their own lives. Instead of seeking help and trying to learn constructive ways to improve their lives and gain that control, they instead do the opposite: they tear others down in order to build themselves up.
They will never be happy following this path. They'll live in a perpetual present of misery and depression. I suppose this is likely one of the reasons that the trans community's attempted suicide rate is at 50% and over 65% of them have depression. What they're dealing with is mental illness of some form or another. These are people who have given up on themselves; regardless of how they pretend otherwise.
It's one of the reasons I'm absolutely convinced that so many now identify as "trans," "non-binary" or any other goofy make-believe nonsense. They're myopic idiots who were raised by shitty parents that let corporations do the brunt of the work for them by plopping them down in front of a glowing screen or by purchasing whatever consumer product the kid wanted that kept them out of their hair so they could do the things they wanted to do. Why does this make sense? It's actually pretty simple. Within a short amount of time of simply observing or associating with these people, anyone would quickly notice that their beliefs are like some bizarre amalgamation of accumulated stereotypes. Their views on women; on society; on men; on religion; on mental illness; on minorities; on sex; you name it and almost every facet of their lives revolves around consumer manufactured stereotypes. It's not a healthy foundation for any individual to begin with. It's why I'm so adamant that parents should keep all consumption of any type of disposable entertainment/social media, which bombards people with a never-ending stream of shit propaganda, to a strict minimum during a kid's formative years. This isn't just a problem for the trans community either, but many across the more left-leaning spectrum.
The identity politics that these kids have been inculcated with has decimated their core identity. They don't know how to deal with these things and turn to the only thing that's ever provided them with comfort and answers: entertainment/social media. They feel the need to "stand out" because simply being a normal good person isn't what's reflected in the world within the glowing screen that they spend most of their time in. They lack any distinguishing features that would set them apart and make them stand out as individuals, so they decide to appropriate a group identity and focus their entire personal identity around that instead.
I'm sure anyone can follow the line of thought from there. They externalize their "uniqueness" in stupid ways because all of the groups they now center their entire identity around demand intellectual conformity. If you've taken a peek into any progressive community you'll undoubtedly see countless people expressing frustration with the inability to express an opinion without getting dog-piled on because that opinion doesn't conform to the group dogma. Likewise, you'll also see countless others constantly apologizing, giving weird disclaimers to make sure they don't offend, mindlessly spouting random dogmatic activist slogans — you know what I'm talking about.
These people have serious issues. Seeing politicians and media continue to promulgate bullshit narratives to pander to insecure retards is not only absurdly stupid, it's also likely very pernicious to our society as a whole. The funniest part is that all of this was predicted in that link I posted a couple times about the 45 ways Communists would destroy western society. Their methods have undeniably been incredibly effective thus far.
I'll include the link once more for anyone who's interested:
https://edberry.com/blog/polymontana/political-platforms/the-45-communist-goals-1963/
watching that boomer talking head casually ask "is it transphobic to say only women have a cervix" immediately made me think of that stonetoss comic.
This is the leader of the labour party, so we're not there yet, but I won't be surprised if the conservative leader is spouting this drivel before too long.
Big Lie Politicking.
Ok then show me a biological man that has one
All right, then. Men don't have cervixes.
Is that better?