We seriously need to end this authoritarian "top-down" medical system that has been growing in the last decade or two. That's the only reason the pandemic has been allowed to continue so long. Giant hospital systems send instructions down from high and healthcare workers are told to just follow the guidelines or else. No independent thought allowed.
Research science should exist to serve doctors and their patients, providing data that can be translated into care based on every doctor's individual assessment of the research. It should not prop up an establishment that governs national healthcare or public health. That kind of thing is easily coopted by politicians, BigPharma, or any other special interest with deep pockets and influence.
Personally I'd like to see a "separation of science and state", but that's probably a bridge too far. We just need to put power back in the hands of doctors and away from "establishment", whether that is the government, academia, insurance companies, hospital groups, or state medical boards. Every doctor should be the king of his domain, at no risk of license suspension without patient complaints. The state should have no power here.
It's not that I necessarily trust doctors, but there's enough of them out there with various opinions that free market forces can apply and they won't naturally become a centralized cabal of public health.
"But what about SNAKE OIL!!!!! We have to save people from getting scammed!"
With what we know today about how governments operate, is there anyone that still thinks dangerous and ineffective tonics weren't driven by those in pursuit of government overreach? It's just like when, during Prohibition, government deliberately contaminated alcohol in order to poison people in order to make an example of those who dared to flout the law.
Also, fuck socialized healthcare. The problem was never the fact that you had to pay for procedures, the problem was corporatized, big pharma-invested hospital chains monopolizing an entire sector. Less academia + Less bureaucracy + More Hospitals = Lower or more competitive pricing. Make Healthcare Capitalist Again!
Lots of men in political power fucking the populace at large as well.
Don't fall into that retard's well of dumbass shittery and [[[noticing]]] things.
It's not a men v women, black v white, jew vs gentile, etc. thing. It's just class warfare, a tale as old as human civilization. The aristocrat-equivalent class has always sought out to gain greater power (social, gubernatorial, religious, economic, etc.) at the expense of the average citizen. We just see it more clearly now that every peasant imagines himself a minor lordling owed recognition and protection under the agreements of the aristocracy.
Which is why we shouldn’t support women in these roles, because they are put in place by those people to be manipulated. ‘Female leader’ Is an oxymoron. For practical purposes, there is no such thing.
Women on the whole cannot separate decision making from the need for approval. Its biological imperative. History clearly demonstrates this ad infinitum.
Yes, but what was the reason the panels hadn't authorized the booster for frontline workers? It wasn't based on safety because they did approve it for people over 65.
Below the stated at risk threshold for age, there is no calculation for increased risk, due to the fact that average risk is infinitesimally small to begin with.
Your chances of being hit by lightning are not significantly different if you’re driving in a convertible or on a rooftop in a steel helmet.
The CDC is a political organization not a scientific one.
We seriously need to end this authoritarian "top-down" medical system that has been growing in the last decade or two. That's the only reason the pandemic has been allowed to continue so long. Giant hospital systems send instructions down from high and healthcare workers are told to just follow the guidelines or else. No independent thought allowed.
Research science should exist to serve doctors and their patients, providing data that can be translated into care based on every doctor's individual assessment of the research. It should not prop up an establishment that governs national healthcare or public health. That kind of thing is easily coopted by politicians, BigPharma, or any other special interest with deep pockets and influence.
Personally I'd like to see a "separation of science and state", but that's probably a bridge too far. We just need to put power back in the hands of doctors and away from "establishment", whether that is the government, academia, insurance companies, hospital groups, or state medical boards. Every doctor should be the king of his domain, at no risk of license suspension without patient complaints. The state should have no power here.
It's not that I necessarily trust doctors, but there's enough of them out there with various opinions that free market forces can apply and they won't naturally become a centralized cabal of public health.
"But what about SNAKE OIL!!!!! We have to save people from getting scammed!"
With what we know today about how governments operate, is there anyone that still thinks dangerous and ineffective tonics weren't driven by those in pursuit of government overreach? It's just like when, during Prohibition, government deliberately contaminated alcohol in order to poison people in order to make an example of those who dared to flout the law.
Follow the science, not that science.
"Follow the science" is a religious mantra. Scientists contradicting their orthodoxy are heretics and to be burned at the stake accordingly.
Consequences for actions when?
Also, fuck socialized healthcare. The problem was never the fact that you had to pay for procedures, the problem was corporatized, big pharma-invested hospital chains monopolizing an entire sector. Less academia + Less bureaucracy + More Hospitals = Lower or more competitive pricing. Make Healthcare Capitalist Again!
Here's a great read related to this https://noqreport.com/2021/09/22/heres-why-doctors-go-along-with-covid-panic-porn-and-cdc-prescriptions/
"TrUsT ThE ExPeRtS!1!1!"
They don't even trust their own experts.
"Eppur si muove."
In a sane world we'd have an FBI and FTC that would be following the money and stock trades of all these politicians and bureaucrats.
Instead they're protecting pedophiles and staging false flag events.
Impossible1 is missing but why is it always women.
Women are useful shields against criticism for bad decisions, because it can all be dismissed as wet leg joints.
Lots of men in political power fucking the populace at large as well.
Don't fall into that retard's well of dumbass shittery and [[[noticing]]] things.
It's not a men v women, black v white, jew vs gentile, etc. thing. It's just class warfare, a tale as old as human civilization. The aristocrat-equivalent class has always sought out to gain greater power (social, gubernatorial, religious, economic, etc.) at the expense of the average citizen. We just see it more clearly now that every peasant imagines himself a minor lordling owed recognition and protection under the agreements of the aristocracy.
Which is why we shouldn’t support women in these roles, because they are put in place by those people to be manipulated. ‘Female leader’ Is an oxymoron. For practical purposes, there is no such thing.
Women on the whole cannot separate decision making from the need for approval. Its biological imperative. History clearly demonstrates this ad infinitum.
I was wondering why the board seemed slower than usual today.
Maybe the matriarchy finally got him? How twisted would that be.
I saw it on the logs, he got a six day ban for saying something stupid while arguing with the stormfags
1, 2, 3 people without mask on while one double-dips on mask.
This is insanity.
Believe in... uh oh... bureaucracy!?
This bitch is both a useless diversity hire and a fraud.
She'd be a MILF if she wasn't part of the tribal globalofag eLiTeS. Shame.
Yes, but what was the reason the panels hadn't authorized the booster for frontline workers? It wasn't based on safety because they did approve it for people over 65.
Below the stated at risk threshold for age, there is no calculation for increased risk, due to the fact that average risk is infinitesimally small to begin with.
Your chances of being hit by lightning are not significantly different if you’re driving in a convertible or on a rooftop in a steel helmet.