Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

93
Removing General Lee, removing Churchill etc - and no one will stop them?
posted 4 years ago by wotfan 4 years ago by wotfan +93 / -0

Winston Churchill charity ERASES his first name and DELETES his picture from its website over 'controversies' about his life and views on race that are 'widely seen as unacceptable' - Daily Mail

46 comments share
46 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (46)
sorted by:
▲ 25 ▼
– DrNilesCrane___ 25 points 4 years ago +25 / -0

Gosh I'm so glad The Good Guys won ww2

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– RoscoePColtraine 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

What'd them Duke boys do to the General? Coo coo coo!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– pertivi 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

I am not very well versed in Anglosphere history : The fist led a revolution against the government and the second resisted a war machine seeking world domination, no ?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– SupremeReader 15 points 4 years ago +15 / -0

He led the Confederate forces only out of local (state) patriotism. He wasn't a politician, at least until he arranged the surrender.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– TentElephant 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

The war between the states was mostly about tariffs and New York hegemony.

Churchill was on the side of the war machine seeking world domination, which is evidenced by the fact that progressives have dominated the world since the American colonization of Europe.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Tourgen 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

No. God damn what a weak beta cuck take. It’s probably not your fault. You were raised that way.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ScientologyOT88 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Who cares about that dead fag brit?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– chadlord69 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

All the Lee statues should be replaced with William tecumseh Sherman. We shouldn’t be glorifying losers and handing out participation trophies to begin with

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– SupremeReader 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

In mid-August 1847, the U.S. Army reached San Agustin, a small village on the outskirts of Mexico City. Unsure which road offered the least resistance, Scott sent Lee on a reconnaissance that revealed the best route was a trail that lay along the edge of a rugged, three-mile wide lava bed called the Pedregal. On August 19, while superintending a work party sent to widen the road, to make it passable for wagons and artillery, Lee skirmished with troops commanded by General Valencia, whose army was camped at Contreras, west of the Pedregal. Lee crossed the Pedregal on foot during the night to inform Scott. Lee then guided the reinforcements across the lava bed’s craggy terrain. After the battles of Contreras (Padierna) and Churubusco, Scott promoted Lee to the brevet rank of Lieutenant Colonel and called his actions at the Pedregal “the greatest feat of physical and moral courage performed by any individual, in my knowledge, pending the campaign.”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– thepalagoon 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

I don't think anyone HERE is discounting Robert E. Lee's military acumen and status as a major American historical figure.

I think the person you're replying to was mocking leftist arguments for tearing down Robert E. Lee statues -- William T Sherman, while also a great general, was kind of a borderline psychopath and openly committed atrocities with the goal being a quicker surrender.

I wouldn't mind some statues of Sherman -- we certainly may need his heart

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– UnsubtleAardvark 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

There are many who are resigned to the idea that disaster is incoming, so that's worth preparing for.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GeneralBoobs 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

This is how you know it's run by hissing fags and hags who only jockey for privileged positions to look good and demand you give them money.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 42 ▼
– deleted 42 points 4 years ago +42 / -0
▲ 27 ▼
– wotfan [S] 27 points 4 years ago +27 / -0

You know what General Patton said...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– oloxxxolo 18 points 4 years ago +18 / -0

Patton was calling out Churchill, Truman, Roosevelt, . . . for being closet commies. That's why they killed him.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rHVljnZ61Vtc/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– acp_k2win 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

Your nerves, hell, you are just a goddamned coward. Shut up that goddamned crying.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– deleted 15 points 4 years ago +15 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Comment Removed

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– Arkana 21 points 4 years ago +21 / -0

In 1955 he supposedly supported the phrase "Keep England White" with regards to immigration from the West Indies. I think he did not understand what he was truly fighting for or against.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– Steampunk_Moustache 23 points 4 years ago +23 / -0

He fought against German domination of Europe, with little consideration of anything else.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Killroyomega 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

He fought on behest of the City of London.

There was no other consideration.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– shadow1500 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

He made no mistake. He couldn't let the Germans dominate Europe.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– ItsOkayToBeWight 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

EU is dominated by the "Germans" today.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– shadow1500 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

At least you can exit the EU like Britain did. Good luck leaving German's sphere of influence if the Nazis won

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Killroyomega 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

The Germans didn't want to dominate Europe.

They marched east into Russia knowing they'd lose entirely to protect Europe.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– RealDrJester 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Germany marched WITH Russia.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Killroyomega 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

As did the Allies.

The Germans at least realized how much of a threat the Soviets were and turned their focus to sabotaging their army.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– RealDrJester 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

And yet, they shared technology, research, propaganda, and decided to split the world in half. Not my fault that you socialists hate other socialists.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Killroyomega 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Bolshevism =/= National Socialism

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– RealDrJester 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

national socialism = socialism

Bolshevism = socialism

National socialists loved bolshevists to the point of teaching them how to build tanks.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 3 ▼
– shadow1500 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Bullshit.... Why would they start a war knowing they would lose?...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Killroyomega 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

The Germans understood that it was a loss regardless. If they sat and did nothing they'd still lose, except they'd lose on their home land and the Soviets would be free to continue on into Western Europe.

When the Germans made the decision to march east they did so entirely to deal enough damage to the Soviet forces that they couldn't afford a counter assault.

They also had assumed that after losing to the Allies they'd be pressed into service against the Soviets.

Instead, the Allies opened the gates and gave half of Germany to the Soviets.

And oh look proxy wars galore for years because Churchill was a fucking idiot and thought Hitler was a bigger threat than Stalin.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– shadow1500 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Churchill couldn't let Germany dominate Europe. he also saw the Soviets as a threat - one to be dealt with afterwards, but he couldn't at the end.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Killroyomega 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Germany didn't want to dominate Europe.

Hitler gave Britain many, many surrender agreements all of which basically amounted to stopping the fighting and Britain paying minor restitution.

Churchill was an idiot who allowed his cities to be bombed to assuage his own ego and placate the City of London.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– shadow1500 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Why would Britain accept that? They were the biggest power in Europe at that time.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy