I don't know where to ask this, Google throws propaganda at the question.
For reasons of travel, I now have to be vaccinated to enter a certain country. So if one has to choose, which is safest?
EDIT - just to clarify, by safe I mean less likely to damage. Vaccine effectiveness isn't a variable here.
It's important to know that even traditional vaccines can cause serious issues. Proper testing removes the ones with higher risk, which along with all the propaganda is why just saying something is a vaccine means it's good in the west. Countries that receive less tested vaccines, or even rejects don't have as positive results.
A live polio vaccine mutating and becoming the leading cause of polio in the world is a recent example. ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement) and other issues can also occur.
I haven't done any research on Sinovac or Covaxin, so I'm not saying there are problems with them, but if you're going to take one, try to find evidence of the risks and effectiveness (including over time).
People infected with SARS nearly 20 years ago have t-cell resistance to SARS-Cov-2, which is 20% different (far higher % than any SARS2 variants). This may mean a vaccine with a more complete pathogen would be more effective and longer lasting, but research is where you find out if it actually is.
Yes, by safe I mean less likely to damage. Vaccine effectiveness isn't a variable here.
Unlike Scott Gottlieb constantly going on television shilling for Pfizer without disclosing that he is on their board, in the article you linked they atleast disclosed that the author of the article is a lobbyist and that he directly benefits from shilling for Covaxin.
The answer is none of them. But if you are male and absolutely have to get the jab, and will roll over like a cuck, the JnJ one seems to have the least chance of bad side effects. It is also the least effective against the ccp virus, weird coincidence right?
Ivermectin
Side-note, you can get vitamin D for free by exposing your skin to sunlight.
So the real advice is as follows: Go outdoors, be fit, eat a balanced diet.
Depends on your skin color.
Pretty racist, huh?
There is no safe way to modify your genetics just to avoid a disease with a 99.9% survival rate.
The vaccine you paid a homeless guy to take in your stead.
Johnson and Johnson. It is the one without the experimental kill you with covid side effects. The major risk is that you develop the same symptoms of vaccines that are extremely rare under normal vaccination, nerve damage Guillain-Barre syndrome. The others also exhibit GBS, but in greater number and other more serious conditions like Myocarditis.
The answer is sadly none of them.
If you can, go to your doctor and discuss it. Your doctor has more knowledge on your medical history personally than I would or should. If you still don't feel confident in his opinion, get a second one.
Instead of trying to find out which one is "safe", I would suggest instead to not view death as a negative side effect and go from there
I'm not kidding.
Read up if you have to be vaccinated or if it's enough to have had the wuflu and have recovered. If you've got the time, just get it and recover. 6 months of "recovered" status should mean you count on the same level as vaxxed AFAIK
I must travel and it's a requirement to enter a country. It's not an option not to.
You just need a card.
Bribes can do wonders. Just sayin'
Should be able to provide a negative test result from a test taken within 72 hours prior to arrival. Unless its Israel or something.
Otherwise, sure. This time it's necessary.
I'm emigrating forever over political turmoil. Legally, of course.
If you were a refugee to America, the CDC would actually pretreat you with Ivermectin to combat parasites lol
Most places don't seem to care about ACTUAL immunity, just about pushing Big Pharma.