I have come to quell TheImpossible1's wrath with wise men. Turn on "As Good As It Gets" and wish me luck boys.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (43)
sorted by:
Evolution and biology don’t care about anyone’s feelings, is the general summary. Women aren’t to blame. Men aren’t to blame.
What IS reprehensible is the systematic lying to and gaslighting of young men by various interests to set them up for a life of misery and exploitation.
The Christians are happy to throw young men on the feminist bonfire if it means white babies.
The progressives are happy to sacrifice young men in the name of their cult and their ideal of equality.
No one gives a single fuck about young men and their lives. Just tools to be used and thrown away.
Not caring about men is also built in to our biology, sadly. As long as it is possible for one man to impregnate large numbers of women, women will always have more reproductive value, and so men will always be regarded as disposable. Human beings and human societies are programmed to think this way.
But so are our brains that allow us to realize this and react to it. Western society gave men certain perks to help make up for the expectation of dying in war, risking their lives working, etc. Marriage helped to ensure that a great number of men didn't go without mates.
When you take all of that away, you're left with beings that are not only being given a raw deal but realize that they are being given a raw deal and are more likely to turn to violence against themselves or others, which is not exactly the recipe for a healthy society. It's also why feminism and related ideologies are so concerned with emasculating "angry (white) males" and rendering them harmless so that they don't have to face the issues they are creating.
It's always been this way bro.
Oy vey, it was white women of course!
It's funny how the brainwashing only worked after they didn't need men to live.
It's almost like they were "hiding their power level" so to speak.
I can't find the date the Frankfurt School was founded, but there are pro male genocide manifestos from as far back as the 19th Century.
There's also the small matter of the Suffragettes, who were bombing buildings in the United Femdom long before WW1.
I'm confused.
Are they trying to quell your wrath with a bunch of quotes validating your stance?
I guess so?
Ending statements with question marks always reinforces my suspicion that you are actually secretly a 24-year-old woman?
That sentence is supposed to end with a question mark to signify my confusion at what's going on.
You can't convey tone through text well.
Like, do we have to use question marks? It's like, we're you know, like Californians?
I read this in my head with an annoying LA accent by a woman in her early 20s.
What?
I think he's trying to be funny.
It is a sad limitation of the English language that there is no proper way to both add a question mark to both Imp's statement and your own?
See? The win! Lol
These are of course generalities, and are observing qualities of masculinity and femininity when it was more common for people to aspire to their correct gender role. There have always been more masculine women that buck the trend, but the exceptions don't disprove the rule or alter the bell curve. Unfortunately men now seem to take on the worse qualities of femininity, and women take on the worse qualities of masculinity. They put on stereotypical blackface of the other sex (trannies being the extreme example) but are incapable of reproducing the positive qualities of that sex.
They have positive qualities?
I mean it’s all true but I still want to put my benis inside of them.
And that is our kryptonite
Hegel was writing nonsense that gave rise to Marx, and ultimately CRT.
Literally anything written by Saint Paul.
You probably don't consider yourself masculine, but I bet in the eras those famous people lived you would be seen that way. The gender roles were different. And a lot of men from now would be seen as feminine back then.
Of these, only the one by Schopenhauer is remotely accurate, and only Aristotle was an actual wise man (Weiniger I don't know).
The Nietzsche one is entirely accurate.
No, it is extremely hyperbolic, and women have often been guardians of virtue and truth - e.g. in revolutionary France and Russia.
Found the guy Weininger is talking about.
How much work do you have to put in to be this wrong?
He's wrong about many things, to which his betters attempt to correct him. Nevertheless, it doesn't stop him from consistently and accurately being wrong about those things ad infinitum.
Hard disagree. I have known some evil women who would plan for the long game of utterly destroying someone, clinging to the present is the entry level game.
I also knew someone like this.
I kept our relationship friendly, just in case.
Glad I'm 3000 miles away from her now.
I was mostly thinking of the 'prefer trifling matters to the most important'. That seems to be worse in women than men, though terrible in both these days.