"They Can't Arrest Us All" - Sen. Rand Paul Urges Americans To "Resist"
(www.zerohedge.com)
Comments (42)
sorted by:
Man, if only the RNC had "resisted" the fraudulent election, instead of certifying it and calling anyone who objected terrorists.
We've got to get rid of the RiNOs and DiNOs first. Which means we need devolution of the federal government, in order for the individual branches to do their jobs unobstructed.
In order to do this, the people must see what the current administration has planned for them. Can't arrest someone until after they have committed their crimes.
You are fucking retarded.
I am so goddamn sick of this No True Scottsman bullshit. Democrats and Republicans are your enemy. Get it through your thick skull. The political parties do not work for you or your interests. The fact that they work against you doesn't make them "fake Democrats" or "fake Republicans". They are genuine representations of what their parties stand for. They just don't stand for you or your interests.
Even Rand Paul isn't /ourguy/ when it comes to immigration. He'd be perfectly fine with half of India coming over here working "high-skill" tech jobs.
Work Visas are proper first steps for immigration and citizenship.
Assuming you want those things. I don't, at least for 10 years and preferably 15-20 if ever.
Birth rate my brother. You skipped a critical step. Or two. As long as we have a welfare state and a birth rate below 2.5 or so we WILL have mass immigration, legal and illegal.
They want mass ethnic enclaves. Immigrants will always vote to keep their culture than to assimilate.
Unfortunately this does nothing to solve the problem of all the foreigners already within our borders.
Duel Citizenship.
Slaps NihilistCaregiver with a glove
Oy vey you're being very anti-semetic goyim!
I want to disagree, but I don't think I can. I've given up on the representative republic. No matter how perfect a candidate you lift up for a position of power, there is only 1 way that they could represent all of your interests: that candidate would have to be you. Naturally, there are finite positions to fill, so there will be many citizens that fail to have their interests represented.
Eradicating Rinos and Dinos is a priority for someone who has not given up on our present political structure. They think it's perfectly fine to have a couple of political boxes and if large amounts of citizens become unhappy then it only means that it's time to change the stickers on the boxes.
I've only thought of two solutions. One is to go full democracy, zero representatives - every little beaurocratic motion requires X% of the population to vote or it goes in the trash, and then there must be some 60%+ of the votes in favor of the motion. This would require a serious overhaul of how voting is handled and the terms of citizenship that can grant voting rights.
The second solution is to just go full retard and boost the number of political representative positions by 10 times or more. Make every representative be a single issue representative so each voter has no need to make a compromise on their values. This would require all political power roles to be voted for, which would make some powerful people very upset. It would also be a large burden on voters, as there would no longer be general roles like "mayor" or "president", and they'd be replaced by large numbers of hyper-specialized politicians.
These are not things that exist. Stop using the terminology.
Explicitly say "politicians that are actively working against my interests".
But I wasn't using them in reference to my beliefs. It'd be more accurate to say "politicians that are actively working against the interests of people who use the terms rino and dino," which is a mouthful, so it's more efficient to just take the label and use it so those people understand it.
I would not use the terms if such a person had not popped up. My expectation for bystanders here is that they understand that our present political system is a farce, so I have little motivation to treat them like normies.
Contextually, I was trying to refer to the type of person you had responded to. Perhaps I was not direct enough to prevent this misunderstanding.
Fair enough.
I have been saying this about masks in schools. When I was in school, we never would have obeyed a mask "mandate". If 99% of the school kids refuse to wear a mask ,what can school administrators do? Does no one have a backbone any more? What a bunch of pussies kids are these days - especially in high school. Never ever ever would we have gone along with this BS.
Their food is full of estrogen, and they have been taught to look only at their phones. And lets face it, all other demographics have suffered similar mental programing. Can't point to any one group, when none of us are resisting.
And as many as 60% of them are on psychoactive mood altering drugs, often at the demands of the teacher.
It feels good for boomers to blame anyone else but themselves. Everyone else is to blame. As they pillage the economy and enslave future generations.
Honestly I think it worked for the maskers because most schools shut down first, then said you had to wear one to go back. So the chain of consistency was already broken and parents were more than willing to play along to get that free child care back.
Its actually pretty smart on their part the way they went about it. If they had just left school alone and then added the masks on top its much more likely they would have had that pushback.
My high school was in a shit neighborhood, and had a reputation for being violent, full of illegalities, and dangerous. When the media was engineering a societal panic over school lockdown drills, we were like "wait, those weren't just a thing for everyone? We've done them for decades...". Cops visited on a weekly basis, if not more often. Weird when you need to re-do the front entrance multiple times because of bullet hole damage... The rulers don't put in petty annoyance policies.
Now they would double down. Cops would patrol the school. Students would be rewarded by snitching on each other. A few outspoken ones would be suspended from the district. The people that run the schools are more ruthless than they were 20 years ago.
School admins back then would see the will of the kids and relent. In a sense they still had a respect for choice.
Now they would just send the cops to enforce it room by room.
The kids haven’t changed all that much, it’s the adults that have.
I for one am done obeying.
If only there was a way to organize a nationwide tax and labor strike to bring the beast to it's knees. Theres already a labor shortage of people too afraid to work, perhaps the elite would notice if more people stopped being wage slaves.
Here is where we get into a real weird area. As that the treasury has taken over many duties from the FED, and a large section of the work force has simply stopped working, having nothing better to do than reading forum post such as this.
These are tools and circumstances that can play into the hands of both American citizens or the globalists.
Since the fractional banking system is provable as fraud, we stand a really good chance of breaking free from their system at this time.
[snicker] we could do like Venezuelans did and start using rare pepes as currency...
I guess I'd better start saving my bottlecaps after all.
Might as well, almost anything will be more valuable than our currency in a few years if biden's check-signing hand doesn't break..
LOL taxes don’t mean shit they just print more money. Inflation is a tax stupid people can’t comprehend. But keep voting for government handouts and the welfare state and crying like a baby over your enslavement.
They can arrest everyone, but that's not really the point.
Civil Disobedience does work when you stand in simple defiance of these laws. You don't need protests or letter writing campaigns, you need defiance and a lack of compliance.
Yep, ask Cuba how non-violent resistance worked out.
Don't need to arrest a corpse. Just saying.
This. They'll shoot you in the throat for unscheduled tours. Only approved "resistance" isn't met with violent force at this point. I honestly don't know what the solution is.
Is he sure about that?
They could, but it makes the less legitimate. They could just machine-gun a lockdown protest. They probably will. But they don't want to do it yet because their actual legitimacy that supports their power structure, and mass murder will undermine that quickly.
The Federal Government has about 1.4 million employees. State governments add about 6 million to that count. Of those, let's be super pessimistic assume 1/4 are willing and able to use violence to enforce mask or vaccine rules. So, a little under 2 million people.
If 100,000 people, or one in 3,500 Americans, refuses to comply, they're outnumbered by those 2 million 20-to-1. That's good odds for the tyrants.
If 1,000,000 people, or one in 350 Americans, refuses to comply, they're outnumbered 2-1. That's pretty close to even odds.
If one in 30 Americans, about 12 million people, were to refuse, the government would be powerless. They'd be outnumbered 5 to 1. Without dropping bombs on American cities, they lose. If they drop bombs on American cities, they still lose.
Think we can hit 3%?
From a philosophical point of view, who exactly are we supposed to be protecting now?
If you're vaccinated, you're protected as much as is possible at this time.
If you're unvaccinated, but eligible, you're made your choice and accept the fact you may catch the coronavirus. From what I can see, the unvaccinated are largely those most opposed to mask mandates and further lockdowns. They don't want us to protect them.
Children who aren't eligible for the vaccine have better natural immunity than anyone. Despite our natural inclination to protect them, they need less protection from coronavirus than anyone.