It's an attempt to distance themselves from accountability - the same as the "why do you care?" stuff - cast the heinous thing they just did as ancient history and the people complaining as some species of zealot arguing over long-since-settled controversies.
In logical terms, these are the same kinds of arguments you hear for why Andy Ngo got a cement milkshake - total abdication of personal responsibility from the people they support, but someone must be held accountable, so it must be something Andy did that made it happen.
The circular reasoning for why the left hates Andy Ngo makes my head hurt so much.
His Twitter feed is full of antagonistic people calling him "not a real journalist", a grifter, a fascist, a nazi, someone promoting hate and violence.
I've yet to see a modicum of evidence or reasoning behind any of this bile, except some "recording" that is often cited where the Proud Boys scolded him for not taking up their offer of protection at an event.
Which is somehow evidence that he's the worst person on earth and deserves all of the assaults and derision aimed at him. And the "smoking gun" is an audio clip of him not listening to antifa's opposition, which is somehow held up as proof that he's a plant?
Yeah, just ask "Do you not fight for social justice?" and if they say yes remember to ask "What's the difference between social justice and legal justice?" and then "Do you think lynchings were legally done?"
Women may not admit it, but they respond really well to the bullying and mockery of others. Find someone on the left to make fun of, let her feel gradually that the people she thinks she likes are lame, but do it in a fun, playful way, like you’re just having a good time.
Or Back to the Future Part II where traveling 30 years into the future to 2015 from 1985 and the best predictions the writing team could make were hoverboards, self-tying shoelaces and the Cubs winning the World Series.
Why are you talking to this dorkette to begin with? Find something else to do.
I have weeds on a steep slope that will keep you busy for a while and it would help me a lot. I'll talk to you while you're hacking them down and I give zero shits about somebody named Lily Peet.
Repeat everything she says in a funny nasal voice. It's the only kind of immature bullshit her stupid petulant woman-child ass would understand. Just call her a woman-child, because that's what she is.
Forcw them to read articles about how the regressive left is a hate group and that critical theory derived ideologes are based in racist and sexist conspiracy theories regarding racism and sexism rather than reality.
You can also force them to stop watching jerry peet by making her read the encylopedia dramatica article which shows how he is a gigantic hypocritical extremist asshole who backstabbed all his friends, aggressively deny's his lolicon fetish, and has a CP planting allegation.
anything they dont like is "old fashioned". They can say chud and incel for a million years and it will always be in fashion though....
The regime dictates what is in fashion.
Progressives follow the regime
Progressives are always in fashion.
It's an attempt to distance themselves from accountability - the same as the "why do you care?" stuff - cast the heinous thing they just did as ancient history and the people complaining as some species of zealot arguing over long-since-settled controversies.
In logical terms, these are the same kinds of arguments you hear for why Andy Ngo got a cement milkshake - total abdication of personal responsibility from the people they support, but someone must be held accountable, so it must be something Andy did that made it happen.
The circular reasoning for why the left hates Andy Ngo makes my head hurt so much.
His Twitter feed is full of antagonistic people calling him "not a real journalist", a grifter, a fascist, a nazi, someone promoting hate and violence.
I've yet to see a modicum of evidence or reasoning behind any of this bile, except some "recording" that is often cited where the Proud Boys scolded him for not taking up their offer of protection at an event.
Which is somehow evidence that he's the worst person on earth and deserves all of the assaults and derision aimed at him. And the "smoking gun" is an audio clip of him not listening to antifa's opposition, which is somehow held up as proof that he's a plant?
Conspiracy theories do not have to make sense.
misogynist, old school.
If SJW were not an accurate label, it wouldn't bother her. She should either take pride in it or question why she doesn't.
Yeah, just ask "Do you not fight for social justice?" and if they say yes remember to ask "What's the difference between social justice and legal justice?" and then "Do you think lynchings were legally done?"
Women may not admit it, but they respond really well to the bullying and mockery of others. Find someone on the left to make fun of, let her feel gradually that the people she thinks she likes are lame, but do it in a fun, playful way, like you’re just having a good time.
I listened to an old Gavin McInnes podcast from 2014 recently where Tucker Carlson was a guest and had a great quote:
No, everytime you consider talking to her do twenty push-ups instead.
Or Back to the Future Part II where traveling 30 years into the future to 2015 from 1985 and the best predictions the writing team could make were hoverboards, self-tying shoelaces and the Cubs winning the World Series.
1984 was just an inversion of 1948.
(It's also implied that the date itself is fake, just like everything within the book is faked including Big Brother, Goldstein, and the war.)
You cant use reason to change a womans mind any more than you can use reason to get a racoon to stop digging through your trash.
What if you become a raccoon ally?
Why are you talking to this dorkette to begin with? Find something else to do.
I have weeds on a steep slope that will keep you busy for a while and it would help me a lot. I'll talk to you while you're hacking them down and I give zero shits about somebody named Lily Peet.
Call them what they are, Leftist authoritarians.
Repeat everything she says in a funny nasal voice. It's the only kind of immature bullshit her stupid petulant woman-child ass would understand. Just call her a woman-child, because that's what she is.
So as I said, woman-child.
Troon-child
Forcw them to read articles about how the regressive left is a hate group and that critical theory derived ideologes are based in racist and sexist conspiracy theories regarding racism and sexism rather than reality.
You can also force them to stop watching jerry peet by making her read the encylopedia dramatica article which shows how he is a gigantic hypocritical extremist asshole who backstabbed all his friends, aggressively deny's his lolicon fetish, and has a CP planting allegation.
You mostly just don't, or feed little bits at a time - gradually capitulating to less and less until they can actually see how clownish things are.
They're trapped in their own little world where they absorb wokeness and revisionist post-modernism like tofu.
You smack her on the head fucking hard, get some blood leaking ( might need a sharp objects). Knock her the fuck out
No
I agree calling your opposition "warriors for justice" of any kind is idiotic. I suggest using oikophobic cunt, evil leftist, or communist