Part of me hopes they succeed. Some in the existing LGBT movement would be pissed to be associated with zoophilia, and it would red-pill a few more normies into speaking out against the whole basket. (as if child grooming wasn't enough)
Why not? They've included every other form of degeneracy. Even the pedos are in the process of getting in. It's now politically incorrect to call them pedophiles. "Minor attracted person" is the term our tolerant and inclusive betters use now.
Did the regressive left actually get that far, or are you talking about how the pedos coined the term M.A.P. as a euphemism to bypass negative attention?
Is our civilization not actively being destroyed? Look at when the west widely started openly accepting sodomy and see how well it tracks with civilization crumbling.
While the bible does say kill zoophiles and kill homosexuals in the same section, I am going to note that it says nothing about pedophilia and that passages used to condemn child abuse in general are used to condemn it. I should also note that it says nothing about Necrophilia likely because the writers never thought of that.
And just to counter questionable downvotes: I am not condoning pedophilia and necrophilia!
I called this happening years ago on other message boards and was ridiculed for it. I may be wrong about the timing however; I thought it would be another decade from now before they become mainstream. Might be closer to five years.
QUEER THEORY More a brand of sexual politics than a social scientific theory, this uses the pejorative ‘queer’ in a positive way to denote a commitment to non-conformist sexualities (such as pornography and sado-masochism as well as homosexuality). Queer theory asserts that there are no natural sexual identities and that queerness is everywhere; everything is a cultural choice. Queer theory encourages novel readings of literary works and cinema but also of cultural products (such as advertisements) in the light of its assumption that queerness is pervasive. - The SAGE Dictionary of Sociology
Zoophillia is a non-conformist sexuality, so zoophiles would be part of the queer community, it would seem. Since there is no natural sexual identities and they're only a product of culture, how can anyone who adheres to queer theory object to a person who is sexually attracted to animals?
LGBTZQP
LGBTMoo
LGBTQPZN
Make? 🤔
Part of me hopes they succeed. Some in the existing LGBT movement would be pissed to be associated with zoophilia, and it would red-pill a few more normies into speaking out against the whole basket. (as if child grooming wasn't enough)
Why not? They've included every other form of degeneracy. Even the pedos are in the process of getting in. It's now politically incorrect to call them pedophiles. "Minor attracted person" is the term our tolerant and inclusive betters use now.
Did the regressive left actually get that far, or are you talking about how the pedos coined the term M.A.P. as a euphemism to bypass negative attention?
In the eyes of God, Necrophilia, Zoophilia, Pedophilia and Sodomy are all one in the same.
An abomination that He has destroyed entire civilizations over.
If God scourges the world and sends all the weirdo SJW/Trans/Communist green haired freak loons to hell, the devil has my sincere sympathies.
Is our civilization not actively being destroyed? Look at when the west widely started openly accepting sodomy and see how well it tracks with civilization crumbling.
While the bible does say kill zoophiles and kill homosexuals in the same section, I am going to note that it says nothing about pedophilia and that passages used to condemn child abuse in general are used to condemn it. I should also note that it says nothing about Necrophilia likely because the writers never thought of that.
And just to counter questionable downvotes: I am not condoning pedophilia and necrophilia!
Is that why Germany is now socialist.
yes, paladin, these ones right here.
The heretics are right over here, Inquisitor.
This gives more credence to the idea that sex crime law abolitionists are using the regressive left as a trojan horse.
I called this happening years ago on other message boards and was ridiculed for it. I may be wrong about the timing however; I thought it would be another decade from now before they become mainstream. Might be closer to five years.
No. It's called "lust."
Up next, chronic zit suckers, people who love to suck the filling out of zits.
It's called popacholic
It's called degeneracy and should be a punishable offense.
“Meet the zoophiles who have sex with animals …”
I’d rather not.
Let’s add it for them.
Zoophillia is a non-conformist sexuality, so zoophiles would be part of the queer community, it would seem. Since there is no natural sexual identities and they're only a product of culture, how can anyone who adheres to queer theory object to a person who is sexually attracted to animals?
So, why wouldn't everyone just choose to be straight?
Because they simultaneously believe that people are born not straight. Do you even double think?
Yeah I pretty much assume any dog that has a rainbow draped on it someplace has been fucked by its owner.
Statistically improbable. While "only" 60-odd percent of lesbians are abusers (look it up), every act of this is animal abuse, 100%.
And when you're losing to what is generally known as the most violent and abusive alphabet classification of human, you know it's bad.