I mean how is something designed to make whites feel guilty and for some reason denounce their “privilege” not anti-white? I’m black and I saw fairly quickly that the diversity push a few years back was rooted in an anti-white motivation. I was raised to look at people as individuals and judge by content of character. I never would’ve dreamed that it would result in me being called a white supremacist or Uncle Tom for saying I don’t focus on skin color.
All of the contradictions inherent in CRT are resolved by ascribing anti-white motivation to the ideology. As an "exploratory framework", CRT arrives at the same conclusions in every case: blame whitey. That's not a legitimate investigation. That's a hypothesis deciding the outcome of your experiment.
Exactly. They also can’t come up with any concrete solutions. Or get mad if you ask them to give specific incidents. Of course every disparity is the result of “evil white man” and woe into anyone who uses actual stats or data
100%. The powers that be realized that they overstepped with CRT, so now they're opening up a path to "defeat" it that doesn't involve whites coalescing into a politically and culturally conscious identity group. The end goal - total subversion and destruction of all majority-white nations - remains unchanged.
I know there are fslurs in this very forum that simps for this whale and calls people stormcucks unironically for saying that CRT is anti-white and should not be called as such because optics. They'll be here any minute now, oh just so you wait.
Then tell that to the people who says that CRT is JUST ahistorical, not anti-white, which is BTW, CUCKING. If that is brand of optics, by lying through omission instead of telling the truth, that is also CUCKING.
Some grifter leftist that pretends to be anti-SJW when it gets her enough clicks. She’s married to an illegal and supports cancel culture against people she disagrees with.
The only based liberals are liberals that realize that having a society ran by White Christian men is the best chance for the freedoms that they claim to care about to flourish.
It is easy to be an anti-Woke liberal while not acknowledging where Wokeness is born & bred. Born from Anti-Christian Marxist cosmopolitans and bred by non-whites & women.
Then pick another one. Many Christians are progressive. You can always hear about Christians talking about Justice, Equality, and Care. What you are going to be looking at is a claim that most Christians aren't Christian.
You can argue that, but then don't tell me that we can hold off Leftism with Christianity when until you purge Leftism from Christendom.
Except Actual Christians are supposed to be the ones standing at the pulpit. That's how you influence the fakers. The problem comes when the ones at the pulpit are preaching Liberation Theology, or accepting narratives about "Equality" and "Diversity".
White Ethno-states have embraced Socialism, see most European countries from Ireland to Denmark, to Sweeden, to Romania at one time or another.
There is no such thing as a secular Christian Theocracy. Your best bet is the Catholic Church which is decidedly Leftist basically everywhere but the US (and it's still split in the US).
Patriarchy won't save you from shit because Feminism is fundamentally patriarchal: that women need to be uplifted and cared for by men's society.
You either embrace an anti-Leftist culture of individualism and responsibility, or basically nothing.
Patriarchy won't save you from shit because Feminism is fundamentally patriarchal: that women need to be uplifted and cared for by men's society.
A Patriarchy is a government of men, and most importantly FOR men.
Don't let anyone, especially Feminists, tell you that a government is a Patriarchy if it is mostly men or even all men. If it is not FOR me, it is not a Patriarchy.
I'm telling you that Feminism is Patriarchy. Patriarchy focuses on protecting women and putting them on a pedestal. It is why Feminism has created a hypergamy. It created an authoritarian system where the state effectively replaced the concept of men and husbands, making women wards of the state and ruining their lives.
Trusting any identity group is never enough, and Patriarchy has an in-built failure in it.
There is no such thing as a secular Christian Theocracy.
I said semi-secular. As in meaning, the state religion is Christianity but people would be free to worship as they please. And keep in mind, this is a hypothetical form of government, it doesn't have to actually existed before.
That part really don't have much do with keeping away Wokeness, it is just the only Theocracy I could tolerate actually living in. I wouldn't want to be stuck with a Christian domination that I didn't like, nor would I want to do that to other people.
I don't care how semi-secular you think you can rationalize this fantasy into being.
There is no such thing as a secular, or semi-secular Christian Theocracy. Those are contradictions in terms.
If you think that you could prefer living in a Theocracy that opposes Wokeness, I would like to point you to the fact that Wokeness operates as a theocracy anyway.
Then there's the fact that many Christian denominations support Wokeness.
Leftism has a long history of utilizing Social Justice in a religious sense to be turned into a Socialist cause. As such, many of these Christians fall right along. That's why you get retards saying "Jesus would have been a Socialist".
It's also why the Catholic Church has literally a zero percent chance of resisting Leftism.
You've tried to separate Socialism out from both Wokeness and Marxism, despite that that all 3 are directly inter-related, to the point that both Wokeness and Marxism are subsets of Socialism.
You guarantee the death of your way of life because you don't recognize the obvious.
They have been, at multiple times, ruled by Socialists, or governed by socialist policies. Your defense is only that it wasn't "real" socialism. At the moment, even if the governments are explicitly Democratic Socialists, they are effectively Fabian Socialists, supported by many Leftist populists.
The UK is a good example of a country that has been ruled by Fabian Socialists for around a hundred years or so, and has been more and less aggressive with it's Socialism in all but name.
You still don't get why people here don't like you? Most of us here have never even HEARD of this person, and here you come starting angry shit as if we worship her. Calm down, and stop projecting.
I know several people who simp for this landwhale on the OPs I've dropped about this same bitch is saying that CRT isn't anti-white because it just fuels white determination, which is this bitch scared of.
I mean how is something designed to make whites feel guilty and for some reason denounce their “privilege” not anti-white? I’m black and I saw fairly quickly that the diversity push a few years back was rooted in an anti-white motivation. I was raised to look at people as individuals and judge by content of character. I never would’ve dreamed that it would result in me being called a white supremacist or Uncle Tom for saying I don’t focus on skin color.
All of the contradictions inherent in CRT are resolved by ascribing anti-white motivation to the ideology. As an "exploratory framework", CRT arrives at the same conclusions in every case: blame whitey. That's not a legitimate investigation. That's a hypothesis deciding the outcome of your experiment.
Exactly. They also can’t come up with any concrete solutions. Or get mad if you ask them to give specific incidents. Of course every disparity is the result of “evil white man” and woe into anyone who uses actual stats or data
If they used actual stats and data they might actually end up solving some of the real problems, and that's the last thing they want.
They can't have uppity blacks being self sufficient, so they throw you in the pit with us.
Good point.
She won't realize that it's all bullshit until she gets thrown out on her ass, just like before. Either that, or she was always controlled opposition.
100%. The powers that be realized that they overstepped with CRT, so now they're opening up a path to "defeat" it that doesn't involve whites coalescing into a politically and culturally conscious identity group. The end goal - total subversion and destruction of all majority-white nations - remains unchanged.
Sorry, can't put that genie back in the bottle.
It's going to happen eventually. The Saxon will begin to hate if they keep this up.
Called this cunt awhile ago. Dudes will simp for ANYTHING.
I know there are fslurs in this very forum that simps for this whale and calls people stormcucks unironically for saying that CRT is anti-white and should not be called as such because optics. They'll be here any minute now, oh just so you wait.
The fuck are you guys talking about? Ive never heard of this person before this post
#metoo
Simping for a whale is beta as fuck and she's not gonna touch your peepee, cucks.
You can just say faggot here. Break out of your reddit mindset.
Fslurs is funnier, because Godwinson dude.
That's not what optics means! It's about appeal, not cucking. If people want us to not say what we mean because "Optics" they can fuck off.
Then tell that to the people who says that CRT is JUST ahistorical, not anti-white, which is BTW, CUCKING. If that is brand of optics, by lying through omission instead of telling the truth, that is also CUCKING.
Yes, I do.
Who?
Some grifter leftist that pretends to be anti-SJW when it gets her enough clicks. She’s married to an illegal and supports cancel culture against people she disagrees with.
Man, all it takes is one look at her to see she's never going to be based. That haircut might as well be called The SJW.
What's 'based' about xer and just who is this person?
The only based liberals are liberals that realize that having a society ran by White Christian men is the best chance for the freedoms that they claim to care about to flourish.
It is easy to be an anti-Woke liberal while not acknowledging where Wokeness is born & bred. Born from Anti-Christian Marxist cosmopolitans and bred by non-whites & women.
Like Joe Biden!
You're putting way too much faith in Whites, men, and Christians, when you assume that that alone will be enough to defeat Leftism.
It's not. It's not even close.
Joe Biden is not a Christian. Nor is any other establishment Politician, Democrat or Republican.
And like many establishment politicians, Joe Biden servers wealthy Anti-Christian cosmopolitans.
Then pick another one. Many Christians are progressive. You can always hear about Christians talking about Justice, Equality, and Care. What you are going to be looking at is a claim that most Christians aren't Christian.
You can argue that, but then don't tell me that we can hold off Leftism with Christianity when until you purge Leftism from Christendom.
Remember that 95%+ of people claiming to be Christian are not.
Sounds like a problem for Christians to correct since so many Christians are bad at Christianity.
Actual Christians probably aren't going to have much influence over the masses of fakers who mostly don't even know their own status.
Except Actual Christians are supposed to be the ones standing at the pulpit. That's how you influence the fakers. The problem comes when the ones at the pulpit are preaching Liberation Theology, or accepting narratives about "Equality" and "Diversity".
I don't assume that will be enough. I didn't articulate what I thought would be enough.
A Constitutional Republic that is
a White ethno-state,
a Semi-secular Christian Theocracy,
and a Patriarchy.
That would be more than enough. Not saying that it could realistically happen at this point or anything.
With the Democratic systems that we have, we should certainly try to elect as many Anti-Woke people as possible.
And for the USA specifically, the state offices matter the most. I even made a recent post about that.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12j08X7lXX/x/c/4J9OAfEXacr
White Ethno-states have embraced Socialism, see most European countries from Ireland to Denmark, to Sweeden, to Romania at one time or another.
There is no such thing as a secular Christian Theocracy. Your best bet is the Catholic Church which is decidedly Leftist basically everywhere but the US (and it's still split in the US).
Patriarchy won't save you from shit because Feminism is fundamentally patriarchal: that women need to be uplifted and cared for by men's society.
You either embrace an anti-Leftist culture of individualism and responsibility, or basically nothing.
A Patriarchy is a government of men, and most importantly FOR men.
Don't let anyone, especially Feminists, tell you that a government is a Patriarchy if it is mostly men or even all men. If it is not FOR me, it is not a Patriarchy.
I'm telling you that Feminism is Patriarchy. Patriarchy focuses on protecting women and putting them on a pedestal. It is why Feminism has created a hypergamy. It created an authoritarian system where the state effectively replaced the concept of men and husbands, making women wards of the state and ruining their lives.
Trusting any identity group is never enough, and Patriarchy has an in-built failure in it.
I said semi-secular. As in meaning, the state religion is Christianity but people would be free to worship as they please. And keep in mind, this is a hypothetical form of government, it doesn't have to actually existed before.
That part really don't have much do with keeping away Wokeness, it is just the only Theocracy I could tolerate actually living in. I wouldn't want to be stuck with a Christian domination that I didn't like, nor would I want to do that to other people.
I don't care how semi-secular you think you can rationalize this fantasy into being.
There is no such thing as a secular, or semi-secular Christian Theocracy. Those are contradictions in terms.
If you think that you could prefer living in a Theocracy that opposes Wokeness, I would like to point you to the fact that Wokeness operates as a theocracy anyway.
Then there's the fact that many Christian denominations support Wokeness.
A "Christian Denomination" that chooses wokeness over the Bible and the words of Christ is not actually Christian.
Leftism has a long history of utilizing Social Justice in a religious sense to be turned into a Socialist cause. As such, many of these Christians fall right along. That's why you get retards saying "Jesus would have been a Socialist".
It's also why the Catholic Church has literally a zero percent chance of resisting Leftism.
It is not Socialism that I am fighting. Wokeness, yes. Marxism, yes.
Non-Marxist Socialism doesn't even bother me that much, even if I generally favor free markets.
Then you are an absolute fool.
You've tried to separate Socialism out from both Wokeness and Marxism, despite that that all 3 are directly inter-related, to the point that both Wokeness and Marxism are subsets of Socialism.
You guarantee the death of your way of life because you don't recognize the obvious.
They have been, at multiple times, ruled by Socialists, or governed by socialist policies. Your defense is only that it wasn't "real" socialism. At the moment, even if the governments are explicitly Democratic Socialists, they are effectively Fabian Socialists, supported by many Leftist populists.
The UK is a good example of a country that has been ruled by Fabian Socialists for around a hundred years or so, and has been more and less aggressive with it's Socialism in all but name.
Christians is a jewcucked slave religion too. You all arent gonna accomplish shit lmao
I don't think anyone is simping for Karlyn Borysenko.
Just ask gapthegnome or whatever that faggot's name is.
Physiognomy reigns supreme.
I'm sorry, did anyone fall for this one? Seriously?
You still don't get why people here don't like you? Most of us here have never even HEARD of this person, and here you come starting angry shit as if we worship her. Calm down, and stop projecting.
Ive never simped for her. I dont even know, or care who she is. The opinions of women are irrelevant in politics.
I know several people who simp for this landwhale on the OPs I've dropped about this same bitch is saying that CRT isn't anti-white because it just fuels white determination, which is this bitch scared of.
Comment Reported for: Violent Speech - Rule 2
Comment Removed