White Ethno-states have embraced Socialism, see most European countries from Ireland to Denmark, to Sweeden, to Romania at one time or another.
There is no such thing as a secular Christian Theocracy. Your best bet is the Catholic Church which is decidedly Leftist basically everywhere but the US (and it's still split in the US).
Patriarchy won't save you from shit because Feminism is fundamentally patriarchal: that women need to be uplifted and cared for by men's society.
You either embrace an anti-Leftist culture of individualism and responsibility, or basically nothing.
Patriarchy won't save you from shit because Feminism is fundamentally patriarchal: that women need to be uplifted and cared for by men's society.
A Patriarchy is a government of men, and most importantly FOR men.
Don't let anyone, especially Feminists, tell you that a government is a Patriarchy if it is mostly men or even all men. If it is not FOR me, it is not a Patriarchy.
I'm telling you that Feminism is Patriarchy. Patriarchy focuses on protecting women and putting them on a pedestal. It is why Feminism has created a hypergamy. It created an authoritarian system where the state effectively replaced the concept of men and husbands, making women wards of the state and ruining their lives.
Trusting any identity group is never enough, and Patriarchy has an in-built failure in it.
There is no such thing as a secular Christian Theocracy.
I said semi-secular. As in meaning, the state religion is Christianity but people would be free to worship as they please. And keep in mind, this is a hypothetical form of government, it doesn't have to actually existed before.
That part really don't have much do with keeping away Wokeness, it is just the only Theocracy I could tolerate actually living in. I wouldn't want to be stuck with a Christian domination that I didn't like, nor would I want to do that to other people.
I don't care how semi-secular you think you can rationalize this fantasy into being.
There is no such thing as a secular, or semi-secular Christian Theocracy. Those are contradictions in terms.
If you think that you could prefer living in a Theocracy that opposes Wokeness, I would like to point you to the fact that Wokeness operates as a theocracy anyway.
Then there's the fact that many Christian denominations support Wokeness.
You've tried to separate Socialism out from both Wokeness and Marxism, despite that that all 3 are directly inter-related, to the point that both Wokeness and Marxism are subsets of Socialism.
You guarantee the death of your way of life because you don't recognize the obvious.
They have been, at multiple times, ruled by Socialists, or governed by socialist policies. Your defense is only that it wasn't "real" socialism. At the moment, even if the governments are explicitly Democratic Socialists, they are effectively Fabian Socialists, supported by many Leftist populists.
The UK is a good example of a country that has been ruled by Fabian Socialists for around a hundred years or so, and has been more and less aggressive with it's Socialism in all but name.
I don't assume that will be enough. I didn't articulate what I thought would be enough.
A Constitutional Republic that is
a White ethno-state,
a Semi-secular Christian Theocracy,
and a Patriarchy.
That would be more than enough. Not saying that it could realistically happen at this point or anything.
With the Democratic systems that we have, we should certainly try to elect as many Anti-Woke people as possible.
And for the USA specifically, the state offices matter the most. I even made a recent post about that.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12j08X7lXX/x/c/4J9OAfEXacr
White Ethno-states have embraced Socialism, see most European countries from Ireland to Denmark, to Sweeden, to Romania at one time or another.
There is no such thing as a secular Christian Theocracy. Your best bet is the Catholic Church which is decidedly Leftist basically everywhere but the US (and it's still split in the US).
Patriarchy won't save you from shit because Feminism is fundamentally patriarchal: that women need to be uplifted and cared for by men's society.
You either embrace an anti-Leftist culture of individualism and responsibility, or basically nothing.
A Patriarchy is a government of men, and most importantly FOR men.
Don't let anyone, especially Feminists, tell you that a government is a Patriarchy if it is mostly men or even all men. If it is not FOR me, it is not a Patriarchy.
I'm telling you that Feminism is Patriarchy. Patriarchy focuses on protecting women and putting them on a pedestal. It is why Feminism has created a hypergamy. It created an authoritarian system where the state effectively replaced the concept of men and husbands, making women wards of the state and ruining their lives.
Trusting any identity group is never enough, and Patriarchy has an in-built failure in it.
I said semi-secular. As in meaning, the state religion is Christianity but people would be free to worship as they please. And keep in mind, this is a hypothetical form of government, it doesn't have to actually existed before.
That part really don't have much do with keeping away Wokeness, it is just the only Theocracy I could tolerate actually living in. I wouldn't want to be stuck with a Christian domination that I didn't like, nor would I want to do that to other people.
I don't care how semi-secular you think you can rationalize this fantasy into being.
There is no such thing as a secular, or semi-secular Christian Theocracy. Those are contradictions in terms.
If you think that you could prefer living in a Theocracy that opposes Wokeness, I would like to point you to the fact that Wokeness operates as a theocracy anyway.
Then there's the fact that many Christian denominations support Wokeness.
A "Christian Denomination" that chooses wokeness over the Bible and the words of Christ is not actually Christian.
It is not Socialism that I am fighting. Wokeness, yes. Marxism, yes.
Non-Marxist Socialism doesn't even bother me that much, even if I generally favor free markets.
Then you are an absolute fool.
You've tried to separate Socialism out from both Wokeness and Marxism, despite that that all 3 are directly inter-related, to the point that both Wokeness and Marxism are subsets of Socialism.
You guarantee the death of your way of life because you don't recognize the obvious.
They have been, at multiple times, ruled by Socialists, or governed by socialist policies. Your defense is only that it wasn't "real" socialism. At the moment, even if the governments are explicitly Democratic Socialists, they are effectively Fabian Socialists, supported by many Leftist populists.
The UK is a good example of a country that has been ruled by Fabian Socialists for around a hundred years or so, and has been more and less aggressive with it's Socialism in all but name.