They coming for white women now. White women are no longer needed as demographics change. I wonder what white women will do when everyone isn't licking their asshole to get their policies voted through? Hmmm.
Yet just yesterday I read how all rape accusations must be believed and the person has no right to defend against rape charges. Just accept guilt, serve your time, due to past oppression. And that person's viewpoint, and whoever wrote this training guide, both vote for the same candidates.
By that standard, men are far more dangerous because more women are killed by men than vice versa. The relevant fact is that these numbers are infinitesimally small.
Most (#notall) crimes are. And it's evident. I don't know why the Left insists on not talking about it, silencing any who dare even meme about it. All that does is make them look factually wrong. They could try to rope it into intersectional crime-dance theory or something and then Motte'n'Bailey the shit out of it, but it's weird that most don't.
They do talk about it. They genuinely belive in blank slate theory. Anything negative is a result of some sort of oppression.
It's why this will end in a dystopia.
No matter what they do low IQ people will keep on massively undreperforming and committing violent crimes, which will require increasingly drastic and desperate measures taken against everyone and everything else.
The big lie (German: große Lüge) is a gross distortion or misrepresentation of the truth, used especially as a propaganda technique.[1][2] The German expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, to describe the use of a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously."
All this was inspired by the principle – which is quite true within itself – that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.
The Cold War historian Zachary Jonathan Jacobson describes its use:[10]
Adolf Hitler first defined the Big Lie as a deviant tool wielded by Viennese Jews to discredit the Germans' deportment in World War I. Yet, in tragically ironic fashion, it was Hitler and his Nazi regime that actually employed the mendacious strategy. In an effort to rewrite history and blame European Jews for Germany's defeat in World War I, Hitler and his propaganda minister accused them of profiting from the war, consorting with foreign powers and "war shirking" (avoiding conscription). Jews, Hitler contended, were the weak underbelly of the Weimer state that exposed the loyal and true German population to catastrophic collapse. To sell this narrative, Joseph Goebbels insisted "all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands." In short, Nazi fascism hinged on creating one streamlined, overarching lie ... the Nazis built an ideology on a fiction, the notion that Germany's defeat in World War I could be avenged (and reversed) by purging the German population of those purportedly responsible: the Jews.
The four-week “learning journey” recommends that staff read Me Not You: The Trouble with Mainstream Feminism, a book by Alison Phipps, a professor of gender studies at the University of Sussex.
She has now deactivated her Twitter account. But this insane woman brings crazy to a whole new level, which by the way is blatantly clear from her appearance.
I'm with the other guy on this one. She is every bit as much of a scumbag as the people she's attacking. The positive on this is watching the left eat each other, as far as I'm concerned both of them belong on the same gallows.
You're thinking about this from a political perspective. I am not. This is far beyond simple politicking right now. They are evil, they should be punished.
You won't get to punish them unless you first defeat them. You won't defeat them unless you go about it smartly. Trying to fight the entire world all at once is a recipe for you being defeated and 'punished'.
No one is trying to fight the entire world at once. We're pointing out that from a moral perspective(the only relevant perspective in this case really), nothing is gained by elevating one evil above another for temporary political gain. In fact, elevating one evil above another for temporary political gain is how we got into this mess in the first place.
I am not going to embrace a leftist just because they happen to be attacking another leftist at the time. They are both equally contemptible, and they're still my enemy and the enemy of the free people of the United States.
We're pointing out that from a moral perspective(the only relevant perspective in this case really),
No, that is the one aspect most irrelevant.
nothing is gained by elevating one evil above another for temporary political gain.
That is a categorical statement based on absolutely nothing. In reality, this is the way it has always been, and will always be. Or have you never heard of balance of power politics?
I am not going to embrace a leftist just because they happen to be attacking another leftist at the time.
You don't have to, but if you are smart, you will elevate the attack and make sure that the greater threat receives a good amount of damage.
Why you guy need this and not just quickly check the categories?
Categories: 1962 birthsLiving peopleAnti-pornography feministsAnti-prostitution feministsBritish women's rights activistsEnglish feministsEnglish feminist writersEnglish journalistsEnglish people of Jewish descentEnglish women non-fiction writersLesbian feministsLesbian writersLGBT journalists from the United KingdomLGBT writers from EnglandPolitical lesbiansRadical feministsSexual abuse victim advocatesPeople from Crouch EndPeople from DarlingtonAcademics of Leeds Beckett UniversityAcademics of London Metropolitan UniversityAlumni of London Metropolitan UniversityThe Guardian people
I kninda blame the mobile version of Wikipedia for how featureless it is, including not showing the categories (and the navigation boxes, and even the links to the talk pages).
They coming for white women now. White women are no longer needed as demographics change. I wonder what white women will do when everyone isn't licking their asshole to get their policies voted through? Hmmm.
One way of looking at it. Hopefully it leads to white families and white children as they look for protection again.
Too stupid to have families and children?
Ah, so extinction. Brilliant plan.
Extinction is not a solution. Embody your philosophy already.
Yet just yesterday I read how all rape accusations must be believed and the person has no right to defend against rape charges. Just accept guilt, serve your time, due to past oppression. And that person's viewpoint, and whoever wrote this training guide, both vote for the same candidates.
They should carry weapons for self-defense if they feel threatened, defined as a standard self-defense.
Speaking of which, anyone up to date with Kyle Rittenhouse, the Mexican Mercenary?
ROFL. No one will ever fear them nor their impotent rage.
Man's fallen nature means that you should never underestimate evil.
But the desire to do evil doesn't do much when you're incapable of it. This is impotent rage, and it should be mocked.
By that standard, men are far more dangerous because more women are killed by men than vice versa. The relevant fact is that these numbers are infinitesimally small.
Besides, this is talking about safety IN THE STREETS.
You think even 6 of those harpies ganging up on you would leave even a scratch on you? Nay, son.
How to say "What is 13%, but also 50%" without mentioning crime statistics.
Sounds like an admission that rape is perpetrated by non-whites at a higher rate than whites.
They aren't people.
Haiti.
Most (#notall) crimes are. And it's evident. I don't know why the Left insists on not talking about it, silencing any who dare even meme about it. All that does is make them look factually wrong. They could try to rope it into intersectional crime-dance theory or something and then Motte'n'Bailey the shit out of it, but it's weird that most don't.
They do talk about it. They genuinely belive in blank slate theory. Anything negative is a result of some sort of oppression.
It's why this will end in a dystopia.
No matter what they do low IQ people will keep on massively undreperforming and committing violent crimes, which will require increasingly drastic and desperate measures taken against everyone and everything else.
Big Lie Politicking
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie
She has now deactivated her Twitter account. But this insane woman brings crazy to a whole new level, which by the way is blatantly clear from her appearance.
Of course, this batshit has won an award for her insanity.
JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOZ
Comment Reported for: Other
Comment Approved
Comment Reported for: Rule 16
Comment Removed
This is pure insanity
lmfao
When a white guy is the perp, its '#BelieveAllWomen'. When a black guy is the perp, its 'Shut your whore mouth'.
The war is against whites, Julie.
I wonder if they had foreseen this future?
You don't have to like her, but exposing Oxfam is a very, very good thing.
I'm with the other guy on this one. She is every bit as much of a scumbag as the people she's attacking. The positive on this is watching the left eat each other, as far as I'm concerned both of them belong on the same gallows.
It doesn't even matter. Oxfam has far greater influence and power than she does, and thus constitutes the greater threat.
You're thinking about this from a political perspective. I am not. This is far beyond simple politicking right now. They are evil, they should be punished.
You won't get to punish them unless you first defeat them. You won't defeat them unless you go about it smartly. Trying to fight the entire world all at once is a recipe for you being defeated and 'punished'.
No one is trying to fight the entire world at once. We're pointing out that from a moral perspective(the only relevant perspective in this case really), nothing is gained by elevating one evil above another for temporary political gain. In fact, elevating one evil above another for temporary political gain is how we got into this mess in the first place.
I am not going to embrace a leftist just because they happen to be attacking another leftist at the time. They are both equally contemptible, and they're still my enemy and the enemy of the free people of the United States.
No, that is the one aspect most irrelevant.
That is a categorical statement based on absolutely nothing. In reality, this is the way it has always been, and will always be. Or have you never heard of balance of power politics?
You don't have to, but if you are smart, you will elevate the attack and make sure that the greater threat receives a good amount of damage.
I don't know what you are talking about.
Somehow, I think this is not an accurate representation.
Which?
Here is her early life section on Wikipedia if anyone is unironically STILL wondering what the real problem is...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Bindel#Early_life
Man, just checking boxes left and right
I'll also add a protip: you don't always have an "Early life" section in every article, but you just always have the categories.
Why you guy need this and not just quickly check the categories?
Stormfags aren't the brightest people around.
I kninda blame the mobile version of Wikipedia for how featureless it is, including not showing the categories (and the navigation boxes, and even the links to the talk pages).
I blame people who rely on Wikipedia for their information.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16
Comment Removed
Comment Reported for: Rule 16
Comment Removed
Where did I say they did? They just combined them with the male need to conquer and use it control nations.