No one is trying to fight the entire world at once. We're pointing out that from a moral perspective(the only relevant perspective in this case really), nothing is gained by elevating one evil above another for temporary political gain. In fact, elevating one evil above another for temporary political gain is how we got into this mess in the first place.
I am not going to embrace a leftist just because they happen to be attacking another leftist at the time. They are both equally contemptible, and they're still my enemy and the enemy of the free people of the United States.
We're pointing out that from a moral perspective(the only relevant perspective in this case really),
No, that is the one aspect most irrelevant.
nothing is gained by elevating one evil above another for temporary political gain.
That is a categorical statement based on absolutely nothing. In reality, this is the way it has always been, and will always be. Or have you never heard of balance of power politics?
I am not going to embrace a leftist just because they happen to be attacking another leftist at the time.
You don't have to, but if you are smart, you will elevate the attack and make sure that the greater threat receives a good amount of damage.
Straight up wrong. This is a moral war, not a political one.
That is a categorical statement based on absolutely nothing.
If two cobras are fighting in the jungle, and one of them kills the other, then good. That's one less cobra.
It doesn't mean that you take the winner home and tell your kids to hug it. It means you chop off the head of the winner too, because cobras are a goddamn menace.
You don't have to, but if you are smart, you will elevate the attack and make sure that the greater threat receives a good amount of damage.
Straight up wrong. This is a moral war, not a political one.
Oh please. If it is a moral war, why are the most immoral people winning so far?
If two cobras are fighting in the jungle, and one of them kills the other, then good. That's one less cobra.
It's more like when a scorpion is fighting a lion. I'm rooting for the scorpion, because the lion is a far bigger threat, even if I'm not going to take the scorpion home afterwards.
Oh please. If it is a moral war, why are the most immoral people winning so far?
Because people like you keep insisting to treat like it a political war.
And naturally, when you fail to bring the right weapon to a fight, you will lose.
It's more like when a scorpion is fighting a lion.
No it isn't, and you aren't "rooting" for anything. You're trying to get in the middle of it and help.
The correct answer is to stand back and laugh while your enemies kill each other.
"if you are smart". Clearly, you aren't.
Hug as many snakes as you want, says the man covered in bite marks.
You go right ahead and cuddle up with evil, see where it gets you. The real right wing has figured out your con game, and won't be playing along anymore. We're tired of cuckoldry and the shitty results it brings. You people haven't "conserved" a goddamn thing in the last century.
No one is trying to fight the entire world at once. We're pointing out that from a moral perspective(the only relevant perspective in this case really), nothing is gained by elevating one evil above another for temporary political gain. In fact, elevating one evil above another for temporary political gain is how we got into this mess in the first place.
I am not going to embrace a leftist just because they happen to be attacking another leftist at the time. They are both equally contemptible, and they're still my enemy and the enemy of the free people of the United States.
No, that is the one aspect most irrelevant.
That is a categorical statement based on absolutely nothing. In reality, this is the way it has always been, and will always be. Or have you never heard of balance of power politics?
You don't have to, but if you are smart, you will elevate the attack and make sure that the greater threat receives a good amount of damage.
Straight up wrong. This is a moral war, not a political one.
If two cobras are fighting in the jungle, and one of them kills the other, then good. That's one less cobra.
It doesn't mean that you take the winner home and tell your kids to hug it. It means you chop off the head of the winner too, because cobras are a goddamn menace.
No.
It is not "smart" to hug a snake.
Oh please. If it is a moral war, why are the most immoral people winning so far?
It's more like when a scorpion is fighting a lion. I'm rooting for the scorpion, because the lion is a far bigger threat, even if I'm not going to take the scorpion home afterwards.
"if you are smart". Clearly, you aren't.
Because people like you keep insisting to treat like it a political war.
And naturally, when you fail to bring the right weapon to a fight, you will lose.
No it isn't, and you aren't "rooting" for anything. You're trying to get in the middle of it and help.
The correct answer is to stand back and laugh while your enemies kill each other.
Hug as many snakes as you want, says the man covered in bite marks.
You go right ahead and cuddle up with evil, see where it gets you. The real right wing has figured out your con game, and won't be playing along anymore. We're tired of cuckoldry and the shitty results it brings. You people haven't "conserved" a goddamn thing in the last century.