We have reached the point where I don't give a shit. Feminists are terrorists. They want us to give up everything and support their causes but give us nothing in return. Fuck you and the whore you rode in on.
There are egalitarian feminists, and there are supremacist & Marxist feminists. They all use the same word, which is why I hate the term. Marxists always parasitise movements and ideas with positive social understanding, using it to benefit and defend themselves while destroying within and out.
Thing is, I don't care anymore. I used to be a feminist until it was hijacked by the marxists. They've ruined everything and none of the feminists tried or were able to stop them. Now, I'm a normal human being who wants people to get along or get out of the way of my truck.
The issue is the same banner, different meanings. The current usage is a supremacist & Marxist definition, but what has allowed it success is that primary social definition (what people perceived it as) was one of egalitarianism.
This is the same with racism & anti-racism. What allowed to current success of the Marxists usage of the word, is that people were convinced of the old definition, and didn't look further into the actions made under it, promoting the very thing they were against.
The video I linked was of a woman who created the first womens' shelter (in name) in the UK. She could be seen as the egalitarian definition. She stated that back then, Marxists noticed they were having little success as "Marxists," but people supported feminism, so they became "feminists." They were still Marxists, but now they were being granted money and power by applying a different word, with a different social understanding than Marxism. Pizzy isn't allowed on the steps of her own womens' shelters because of how this infiltration progressed, and has received heavy pushback for trying to create mens' shelters.
There are still people convinced that the egalitarian definition still applies, but they're the type that stay ignorant, and end up only furthering the harm of its current usage.
She stated that back then, Marxists noticed they were having little success as "Marxists," but people supported feminism, so they became "feminists." They were still Marxists, but now they were being granted money and power by applying a different word, with a different social understanding than Marxism.
The left adores their word games, and it's semi-disturbing how many on here play into it.
China knows that feminism destroys civilizations, which is why they fund groups that push it in the West. They sure as shit know better than allowing it to infect their own society.
I always found it odd that foreign governments and assets are allowed to fund ideological zealot groups in other countries that in turn fund political candidates.
Like, sure, let's say China isn't bribing Biden directly (though they totally are). But they can give to a superpac which in turn sends it to Biden, and that's perfectly fine? It's just weird.
PAC: "Oh, our pac doesn't give any foreign money to the government, it uses the foreign donations to pay for overhead, while the domestic ones go 100% to the government"
Sane: "What would you do if you have no foreign ones, forgo your own paycheques?"
PAC: "God no, we'd use domestic donations."
Sane: "So without the foreign money, less money would go to your target."
PAC: "Yes."
Sane: "But no foreign money goes to your target."
PAC: "That is correct."
Sane: "But if foreigners stopped donating, your target would go bankrupt, even with the exact same number of domestic donators going through you to your target."
PAC: "Indeed."
Sane: "Then you're giving foreign money to politicians!"
If that was the case, why are they still progressing?
They make good foot soldiers. Anyone who has seen history of USSR can instantly catch a short term benefit of USSRing a country. It's short term because it only lasts a single lifetime, but guess what, that's all average crook cares about.
Lu added that when feminists are politically stigmatized in China, the general public also avoids being associated with them, which creates a chilling effect. "If we no longer have a safe space, it will be hard for feminists to keep in touch, and this has become a new reality for us," she said.
China recognizes the obvious. Feminism hasn't produced good results. They've been trying to force feminism onto the Uighurs, which means they see it as a weapon of democide.
Feminism is about shaking down rich and weak organizations for the free fruit.
This is why there are no feminists who care about Iranian women (poor country) and no feminists who care about Saudi or Chinese women (strong governments unlikely to fold to their blackmail)
That Western feminazis want their ideology to go everywhere is not a surprise. What is perhaps a surprise is that the poison has spread to China, to the extent that the government feels the need to crack down on it.
the plan.
What plan is that?
The male population must be reduced to 10% and power restored to women.
This is where you get into your usual nutty territory.
I don't know why I'm crazy for quoting the paper they took their slogan from.
Yeah, you most certainly are batty, because you cherry-picked one thing and tried to pin it on them all. It's not "their slogan", and of those who use it, 99% are too stupid and ignorant to know where it came from, let alone endorsing it.
Not to say that you shouldn't use it against them. But do it in a way that is more subtle and makes them look bad instead of us.
Assuming they're too stupid, too powerless or too kind to harm us has gone well so far.
They definitely are stupid, but one should not assume that stupid ideas cannot get hegemonic status.
we should actually take every word they state as their gospel
You don't do that. Because when they say that they don't hate men, you claim that it's just a lie to divert attention from THE PLAAAAAAN. Which somehow always boils down to killing you.
We have reached the point where I don't give a shit. Feminists are terrorists. They want us to give up everything and support their causes but give us nothing in return. Fuck you and the whore you rode in on.
There are egalitarian feminists, and there are supremacist & Marxist feminists. They all use the same word, which is why I hate the term. Marxists always parasitise movements and ideas with positive social understanding, using it to benefit and defend themselves while destroying within and out.
Erin Pizzy has said some good things on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcpgXWnfW4w
Thing is, I don't care anymore. I used to be a feminist until it was hijacked by the marxists. They've ruined everything and none of the feminists tried or were able to stop them. Now, I'm a normal human being who wants people to get along or get out of the way of my truck.
The issue is the same banner, different meanings. The current usage is a supremacist & Marxist definition, but what has allowed it success is that primary social definition (what people perceived it as) was one of egalitarianism.
This is the same with racism & anti-racism. What allowed to current success of the Marxists usage of the word, is that people were convinced of the old definition, and didn't look further into the actions made under it, promoting the very thing they were against.
The video I linked was of a woman who created the first womens' shelter (in name) in the UK. She could be seen as the egalitarian definition. She stated that back then, Marxists noticed they were having little success as "Marxists," but people supported feminism, so they became "feminists." They were still Marxists, but now they were being granted money and power by applying a different word, with a different social understanding than Marxism. Pizzy isn't allowed on the steps of her own womens' shelters because of how this infiltration progressed, and has received heavy pushback for trying to create mens' shelters.
There are still people convinced that the egalitarian definition still applies, but they're the type that stay ignorant, and end up only furthering the harm of its current usage.
The left adores their word games, and it's semi-disturbing how many on here play into it.
I agree, egalitarian feminism died by the turn of the eighties and only the extremist scum are left.
On a related note, did Christina Hoff Summers go regressive or become a Gender Crit?
China knows that feminism destroys civilizations, which is why they fund groups that push it in the West. They sure as shit know better than allowing it to infect their own society.
I always found it odd that foreign governments and assets are allowed to fund ideological zealot groups in other countries that in turn fund political candidates.
Like, sure, let's say China isn't bribing Biden directly (though they totally are). But they can give to a superpac which in turn sends it to Biden, and that's perfectly fine? It's just weird.
PAC: "Oh, our pac doesn't give any foreign money to the government, it uses the foreign donations to pay for overhead, while the domestic ones go 100% to the government"
Sane: "What would you do if you have no foreign ones, forgo your own paycheques?"
PAC: "God no, we'd use domestic donations."
Sane: "So without the foreign money, less money would go to your target."
PAC: "Yes."
Sane: "But no foreign money goes to your target."
PAC: "That is correct."
Sane: "But if foreigners stopped donating, your target would go bankrupt, even with the exact same number of domestic donators going through you to your target."
PAC: "Indeed."
Sane: "Then you're giving foreign money to politicians!"
PAC: "Of course not!"
They make good foot soldiers. Anyone who has seen history of USSR can instantly catch a short term benefit of USSRing a country. It's short term because it only lasts a single lifetime, but guess what, that's all average crook cares about.
"When we are less powerful than you..."
China recognizes the obvious. Feminism hasn't produced good results. They've been trying to force feminism onto the Uighurs, which means they see it as a weapon of democide.
I assume this is the case. And China certainly isn't going to start importing Africans to bring up their population numbers.
This plus the masculinity problem plus some of the ones outside of China have posted pro Uyger stuff on Wechat and Weibo which is a big no no.
Oh great, these rabid ideologues are now going to try to poison China as well?
Feminism is about shaking down rich and weak organizations for the free fruit.
This is why there are no feminists who care about Iranian women (poor country) and no feminists who care about Saudi or Chinese women (strong governments unlikely to fold to their blackmail)
Yes, and not just feminism - all these identitarian movements.
That Western feminazis want their ideology to go everywhere is not a surprise. What is perhaps a surprise is that the poison has spread to China, to the extent that the government feels the need to crack down on it.
What plan is that?
This is where you get into your usual nutty territory.
Yeah, you most certainly are batty, because you cherry-picked one thing and tried to pin it on them all. It's not "their slogan", and of those who use it, 99% are too stupid and ignorant to know where it came from, let alone endorsing it.
Not to say that you shouldn't use it against them. But do it in a way that is more subtle and makes them look bad instead of us.
They definitely are stupid, but one should not assume that stupid ideas cannot get hegemonic status.
You don't do that. Because when they say that they don't hate men, you claim that it's just a lie to divert attention from THE PLAAAAAAN. Which somehow always boils down to killing you.
WTF I love China now! China No 1!