Assuming they're too stupid, too powerless or too kind to harm us has gone well so far.
They definitely are stupid, but one should not assume that stupid ideas cannot get hegemonic status.
we should actually take every word they state as their gospel
You don't do that. Because when they say that they don't hate men, you claim that it's just a lie to divert attention from THE PLAAAAAAN. Which somehow always boils down to killing you.
Not me specifically, I'm not that self-obsessed. But yes, that is the plan. They talk about it enough for the excuses to not really convince me otherwise. If you really didn't want something, you wouldn't be constantly caught promoting people who do. They've had murderers at their rallies, chants about murdering us at their protests, their slogan refers to mass murder, they refuse to condemn those who call for it, nearly every bit of entertainment they produce contains either excessively violent male deaths or dehumanizes men...
To say the ideologues aren't evil is insanity,. The question is simply this - what proportion of women are? The more I see, the more I think that proportion is over 50%.
I mean we should believe what they say privately, not what they say publicly. We know that they pretend to be our allies constantly and that nothing they say publicly is worth shit. We should be looking at what they say when they think we aren't looking.
Excessively violent is not a characteristic I would give Call of Duty. I mean very gory and graphic deaths that are clearly for the pleasure of the sadistic female viewer. I know that you know what I mean, you must have seen the uptick in this kind of thing.
I don't agree with that, but it's not really the point I was making. What I was trying to say was that I don't know how many women will back this insanity wherever it goes, but I'm more and more sure it's a majority.
I mean we should believe what they say privately, not what they say publicly.
Yet you constantly cite what 'they' say publicly, and use that as an excuse to attack the whole group.
Don't get me wrong, I also believe that feminism is cancer. But to attack the dupes is not going to get you anywhere. But you're also not interesting in getting anywhere, because nothing that you say or do is ever aimed at anything positive. By your own claims, there is no way that you can possibly win.
I mean very gory and graphic deaths that are clearly for the pleasure of the sadistic female viewer. I know that you know what I mean, you must have seen the uptick in this kind of thing.
Not at all, as I generally avoid the SJW-infested 'entertainment' foisted on us nowadays.
I don't agree with that, but it's not really the point I was making.
You see, that is your problem. You think I am a 'tradcuck' for sticking to the values that made the West great. But while I would have found it absurd 7 years ago, I think empirical evidence has shown the truth of man's fallen nature.
What I was trying to say was that I don't know how many women will back this insanity wherever it goes, but I'm more and more sure it's a majority.
Depends on where it goes. Note that a lot of their propaganda is aimed at making women feel even more unsafe than they should. If one actually believes that 1 in 3 women are raped at university every year, it certainly is less unreasonable to back procedures that violate the rights of the accused than if it's a non-problem as now.
They definitely are stupid, but one should not assume that stupid ideas cannot get hegemonic status.
You don't do that. Because when they say that they don't hate men, you claim that it's just a lie to divert attention from THE PLAAAAAAN. Which somehow always boils down to killing you.
If they were so stupid, they wouldn't be winning.
Not me specifically, I'm not that self-obsessed. But yes, that is the plan. They talk about it enough for the excuses to not really convince me otherwise. If you really didn't want something, you wouldn't be constantly caught promoting people who do. They've had murderers at their rallies, chants about murdering us at their protests, their slogan refers to mass murder, they refuse to condemn those who call for it, nearly every bit of entertainment they produce contains either excessively violent male deaths or dehumanizes men...
To say the ideologues aren't evil is insanity,. The question is simply this - what proportion of women are? The more I see, the more I think that proportion is over 50%.
You just said that you think we should believe what they say. Well, they say they don't want to do that.
Now you hate COD too, Anita?
Evil? 100%. They are human, after all, and all humans are evil.
I mean we should believe what they say privately, not what they say publicly. We know that they pretend to be our allies constantly and that nothing they say publicly is worth shit. We should be looking at what they say when they think we aren't looking.
Excessively violent is not a characteristic I would give Call of Duty. I mean very gory and graphic deaths that are clearly for the pleasure of the sadistic female viewer. I know that you know what I mean, you must have seen the uptick in this kind of thing.
I don't agree with that, but it's not really the point I was making. What I was trying to say was that I don't know how many women will back this insanity wherever it goes, but I'm more and more sure it's a majority.
Yet you constantly cite what 'they' say publicly, and use that as an excuse to attack the whole group.
Don't get me wrong, I also believe that feminism is cancer. But to attack the dupes is not going to get you anywhere. But you're also not interesting in getting anywhere, because nothing that you say or do is ever aimed at anything positive. By your own claims, there is no way that you can possibly win.
Not at all, as I generally avoid the SJW-infested 'entertainment' foisted on us nowadays.
You see, that is your problem. You think I am a 'tradcuck' for sticking to the values that made the West great. But while I would have found it absurd 7 years ago, I think empirical evidence has shown the truth of man's fallen nature.
Depends on where it goes. Note that a lot of their propaganda is aimed at making women feel even more unsafe than they should. If one actually believes that 1 in 3 women are raped at university every year, it certainly is less unreasonable to back procedures that violate the rights of the accused than if it's a non-problem as now.