I mean we should believe what they say privately, not what they say publicly.
Yet you constantly cite what 'they' say publicly, and use that as an excuse to attack the whole group.
Don't get me wrong, I also believe that feminism is cancer. But to attack the dupes is not going to get you anywhere. But you're also not interesting in getting anywhere, because nothing that you say or do is ever aimed at anything positive. By your own claims, there is no way that you can possibly win.
I mean very gory and graphic deaths that are clearly for the pleasure of the sadistic female viewer. I know that you know what I mean, you must have seen the uptick in this kind of thing.
Not at all, as I generally avoid the SJW-infested 'entertainment' foisted on us nowadays.
I don't agree with that, but it's not really the point I was making.
You see, that is your problem. You think I am a 'tradcuck' for sticking to the values that made the West great. But while I would have found it absurd 7 years ago, I think empirical evidence has shown the truth of man's fallen nature.
What I was trying to say was that I don't know how many women will back this insanity wherever it goes, but I'm more and more sure it's a majority.
Depends on where it goes. Note that a lot of their propaganda is aimed at making women feel even more unsafe than they should. If one actually believes that 1 in 3 women are raped at university every year, it certainly is less unreasonable to back procedures that violate the rights of the accused than if it's a non-problem as now.
Do I? I never believe their statements of allyship or anything else directed at us. I only believe what they say when talking to each other.
I am interested in getting somewhere, but very, very few people would want to go there with me. And no, I'm not talking about genocide, I'm talking about crimes against humanity charges against their leaders. Like the Q LARPers hoped for, but not for ridiculous conspiracies like adrenochrome.
you think I am a tradcuck for sticking to the values that made the West great.
No, I think you're a tradcuck because you can look at modern women and genuinely believe that I'm wrong about them.
Jokes aside, I don't think holding up increasingly ridiculous contracts with people who show no interest in fairness makes anything great, except their bank balances.
Depends on where it goes.
I think this is where we differ most. You assume good faith and gullibility where I assume duplicity and malice.
I am interested in getting somewhere, but very, very few people would want to go there with me.
You think 'they' are monolithically evil. So even if you managed to persuade all men that 'they' are all bad, you'd still be outvoted by 'them'. That is according to your own theories.
So there is no mechanism at all by which you can prevail.
No, I think you're a tradcuck because you can look at modern women and genuinely believe that I'm wrong about them.
You're wrong in that you generalize. Not that they are not generally bad. I also think that humanity in general is pretty bad.
I don't think holding up increasingly ridiculous contracts with people who show no interest in fairness makes anything great, except their bank balances.
What makes you think anyone is interested in 'fairness'?
I think this is where we differ most. You assume good faith and gullibility where I assume duplicity and malice.
You must think I'm a retard. I don't expect 'good faith' at all.
I don't believe they are monolithically evil. I just don't believe that any of them can be trusted due to the nature of feminist power. It always comes from hiding away and only revealing your goals after the power is yours.
Well, they are half of it.
Every contract has to be at least close to fair. Even the worst offenders in business don't come close to the marriage contract as an entirely bullshit, borderline fraudulent process of acquiring money.
So you don't believe that women believe that rape is common? I assume you do, because otherwise you'd agree with my interpretation of that argument - that it's a bludgeon that they know is bullshit and use anyway because it works for their ends.
I just don't believe that any of them can be trusted due to the nature of feminist power.
Congratulations, you found out that half the human population cannot be trusted. Wait till you figure out that the other half can also not be trusted.
Even the worst offenders in business don't come close to the marriage contract as an entirely bullshit, borderline fraudulent process of acquiring money.
Sometimes, yes. In the case of Bezos, no. He deserved to be soaked for being a cheating bastard. Or are you going to defend that as well?
So you don't believe that women believe that rape is common?
It's fairly common, but 1 in 3 every year is retarded. That is Congo-level crap.
it's a bludgeon that they know is bullshit and use anyway because it works for their ends.
I've seen conspiracy theorists who believe that a cabal is conspiring, but I've never seen someone who believes literally half the human population is in a conspiracy.
Yet you constantly cite what 'they' say publicly, and use that as an excuse to attack the whole group.
Don't get me wrong, I also believe that feminism is cancer. But to attack the dupes is not going to get you anywhere. But you're also not interesting in getting anywhere, because nothing that you say or do is ever aimed at anything positive. By your own claims, there is no way that you can possibly win.
Not at all, as I generally avoid the SJW-infested 'entertainment' foisted on us nowadays.
You see, that is your problem. You think I am a 'tradcuck' for sticking to the values that made the West great. But while I would have found it absurd 7 years ago, I think empirical evidence has shown the truth of man's fallen nature.
Depends on where it goes. Note that a lot of their propaganda is aimed at making women feel even more unsafe than they should. If one actually believes that 1 in 3 women are raped at university every year, it certainly is less unreasonable to back procedures that violate the rights of the accused than if it's a non-problem as now.
Do I? I never believe their statements of allyship or anything else directed at us. I only believe what they say when talking to each other.
I am interested in getting somewhere, but very, very few people would want to go there with me. And no, I'm not talking about genocide, I'm talking about crimes against humanity charges against their leaders. Like the Q LARPers hoped for, but not for ridiculous conspiracies like adrenochrome.
No, I think you're a tradcuck because you can look at modern women and genuinely believe that I'm wrong about them.
Jokes aside, I don't think holding up increasingly ridiculous contracts with people who show no interest in fairness makes anything great, except their bank balances.
I think this is where we differ most. You assume good faith and gullibility where I assume duplicity and malice.
You think 'they' are monolithically evil. So even if you managed to persuade all men that 'they' are all bad, you'd still be outvoted by 'them'. That is according to your own theories.
So there is no mechanism at all by which you can prevail.
You're wrong in that you generalize. Not that they are not generally bad. I also think that humanity in general is pretty bad.
What makes you think anyone is interested in 'fairness'?
You must think I'm a retard. I don't expect 'good faith' at all.
I don't believe they are monolithically evil. I just don't believe that any of them can be trusted due to the nature of feminist power. It always comes from hiding away and only revealing your goals after the power is yours.
Well, they are half of it.
Every contract has to be at least close to fair. Even the worst offenders in business don't come close to the marriage contract as an entirely bullshit, borderline fraudulent process of acquiring money.
So you don't believe that women believe that rape is common? I assume you do, because otherwise you'd agree with my interpretation of that argument - that it's a bludgeon that they know is bullshit and use anyway because it works for their ends.
Congratulations, you found out that half the human population cannot be trusted. Wait till you figure out that the other half can also not be trusted.
Sometimes, yes. In the case of Bezos, no. He deserved to be soaked for being a cheating bastard. Or are you going to defend that as well?
It's fairly common, but 1 in 3 every year is retarded. That is Congo-level crap.
I've seen conspiracy theorists who believe that a cabal is conspiring, but I've never seen someone who believes literally half the human population is in a conspiracy.