Do I? I never believe their statements of allyship or anything else directed at us. I only believe what they say when talking to each other.
I am interested in getting somewhere, but very, very few people would want to go there with me. And no, I'm not talking about genocide, I'm talking about crimes against humanity charges against their leaders. Like the Q LARPers hoped for, but not for ridiculous conspiracies like adrenochrome.
you think I am a tradcuck for sticking to the values that made the West great.
No, I think you're a tradcuck because you can look at modern women and genuinely believe that I'm wrong about them.
Jokes aside, I don't think holding up increasingly ridiculous contracts with people who show no interest in fairness makes anything great, except their bank balances.
Depends on where it goes.
I think this is where we differ most. You assume good faith and gullibility where I assume duplicity and malice.
I am interested in getting somewhere, but very, very few people would want to go there with me.
You think 'they' are monolithically evil. So even if you managed to persuade all men that 'they' are all bad, you'd still be outvoted by 'them'. That is according to your own theories.
So there is no mechanism at all by which you can prevail.
No, I think you're a tradcuck because you can look at modern women and genuinely believe that I'm wrong about them.
You're wrong in that you generalize. Not that they are not generally bad. I also think that humanity in general is pretty bad.
I don't think holding up increasingly ridiculous contracts with people who show no interest in fairness makes anything great, except their bank balances.
What makes you think anyone is interested in 'fairness'?
I think this is where we differ most. You assume good faith and gullibility where I assume duplicity and malice.
You must think I'm a retard. I don't expect 'good faith' at all.
I don't believe they are monolithically evil. I just don't believe that any of them can be trusted due to the nature of feminist power. It always comes from hiding away and only revealing your goals after the power is yours.
Well, they are half of it.
Every contract has to be at least close to fair. Even the worst offenders in business don't come close to the marriage contract as an entirely bullshit, borderline fraudulent process of acquiring money.
So you don't believe that women believe that rape is common? I assume you do, because otherwise you'd agree with my interpretation of that argument - that it's a bludgeon that they know is bullshit and use anyway because it works for their ends.
I just don't believe that any of them can be trusted due to the nature of feminist power.
Congratulations, you found out that half the human population cannot be trusted. Wait till you figure out that the other half can also not be trusted.
Even the worst offenders in business don't come close to the marriage contract as an entirely bullshit, borderline fraudulent process of acquiring money.
Sometimes, yes. In the case of Bezos, no. He deserved to be soaked for being a cheating bastard. Or are you going to defend that as well?
So you don't believe that women believe that rape is common?
It's fairly common, but 1 in 3 every year is retarded. That is Congo-level crap.
it's a bludgeon that they know is bullshit and use anyway because it works for their ends.
I've seen conspiracy theorists who believe that a cabal is conspiring, but I've never seen someone who believes literally half the human population is in a conspiracy.
I don't trust anyone, I just trust women even less.
I'm not defending it, but let's be honest, at no point has she put in even one million worth of work. Her settlement was in the billions and most of it ended up in the feminist war chest. Same will happen with Gates' wife.
It's not common at all. But yes, those figures are more obviously false than Dogecoin's value.
I don't believe that.
I believe that women act in accordance with their strong in-group bias, they don't need to conspire because it's their default state.
Meanwhile, those with power are conspiring to destroy men's lives in accordance with the goals set by the radical feminists that they support. This is a separate group of people, but because they don't carry around a banner showing who they are, any woman with power could be one of them.
Do I? I never believe their statements of allyship or anything else directed at us. I only believe what they say when talking to each other.
I am interested in getting somewhere, but very, very few people would want to go there with me. And no, I'm not talking about genocide, I'm talking about crimes against humanity charges against their leaders. Like the Q LARPers hoped for, but not for ridiculous conspiracies like adrenochrome.
No, I think you're a tradcuck because you can look at modern women and genuinely believe that I'm wrong about them.
Jokes aside, I don't think holding up increasingly ridiculous contracts with people who show no interest in fairness makes anything great, except their bank balances.
I think this is where we differ most. You assume good faith and gullibility where I assume duplicity and malice.
You think 'they' are monolithically evil. So even if you managed to persuade all men that 'they' are all bad, you'd still be outvoted by 'them'. That is according to your own theories.
So there is no mechanism at all by which you can prevail.
You're wrong in that you generalize. Not that they are not generally bad. I also think that humanity in general is pretty bad.
What makes you think anyone is interested in 'fairness'?
You must think I'm a retard. I don't expect 'good faith' at all.
I don't believe they are monolithically evil. I just don't believe that any of them can be trusted due to the nature of feminist power. It always comes from hiding away and only revealing your goals after the power is yours.
Well, they are half of it.
Every contract has to be at least close to fair. Even the worst offenders in business don't come close to the marriage contract as an entirely bullshit, borderline fraudulent process of acquiring money.
So you don't believe that women believe that rape is common? I assume you do, because otherwise you'd agree with my interpretation of that argument - that it's a bludgeon that they know is bullshit and use anyway because it works for their ends.
Congratulations, you found out that half the human population cannot be trusted. Wait till you figure out that the other half can also not be trusted.
Sometimes, yes. In the case of Bezos, no. He deserved to be soaked for being a cheating bastard. Or are you going to defend that as well?
It's fairly common, but 1 in 3 every year is retarded. That is Congo-level crap.
I've seen conspiracy theorists who believe that a cabal is conspiring, but I've never seen someone who believes literally half the human population is in a conspiracy.
I don't trust anyone, I just trust women even less.
I'm not defending it, but let's be honest, at no point has she put in even one million worth of work. Her settlement was in the billions and most of it ended up in the feminist war chest. Same will happen with Gates' wife.
It's not common at all. But yes, those figures are more obviously false than Dogecoin's value.
I don't believe that.
I believe that women act in accordance with their strong in-group bias, they don't need to conspire because it's their default state.
Meanwhile, those with power are conspiring to destroy men's lives in accordance with the goals set by the radical feminists that they support. This is a separate group of people, but because they don't carry around a banner showing who they are, any woman with power could be one of them.