Well, it's officially out in the open now
(twitter.com)
Comments (37)
sorted by:
Cool, sweet, we got it on tape. Now enforce the anti-communist laws.
The mask has been off for a while.
Blasio has always been communist filth.
I'm for it. All of these leftist cities are locked in a purity spiral of escalating insanity. Los Angeles is decriminalizing almost everything. Seattle is doing the same. New York City is openly communist. Detroit, Atlanta, Milwaukee, and Philly just stole an election. What's next?
I'm thinking that all these cities are going to end up making Detroit of of the 70s-90s look like fucking Atlantis in comparison. Criminals will run rampant preying on the poor and the middle class, combined with new waves of gun control and anti-self defense policing (the only 'crime' that will be prosecuted will be self defense).
The middle class will be demolished through climate change legislation making everything much more expensive, while the waves of immigrants get moved to the suburbs and exurbs making fleeing the destruction impossible and unaffordable. Only the elites will have protection from criminals and schools that aren't absolute cesspools of racism and false achievement.
I know it's always been a big taboo with KiA, but do I really have to say "Unless we actually kill them..." at this point?
Not a winning argument at this point.
The appropriate response to Bill deBlasio is Bill deWall.
It's not really meant to be an argument.
Although, I will argue that if we know where this is headed, and we have been calling it out for years now, then we clearly have not been putting out "a winning argument" so far.
Liberalism is dying. I can't say whether calling for bloody revolution is or is not "a winning argument" at this point, but I can say that traditional liberal argument, through conversation and debate, is definitely a losing strategy at this point.
Of course it is. It’s what they always do: lie, lie some more, claim it’s “debunked”, and once they have you right where they want you, admit it’s true and tell you it’s a good thing.
If incontrovertible evidence that Biden’s campaign rigged the election comes out they won’t even care. They’ll just drop the facade and tell us it’s a good thing.
Yep. That seems to be the game plan.
That evidence has come out multiple times, they’ve just ignored it.
Hmm.
Sounds like New York City needs some liberating.
No.
Last call, build a wall, and let them stew in their stupidity for a few decades.
I'm not interested in surrendering territory to communists.
Then that's your mistake. What's the first thing any doctor or society will do with an infection. We're living in it right now. Lockdown and isolate.
If it doesn't kill itself off after that, excise with scalpel.
Only after that is the radiation option taken.
I am 100% totally referring to medical process here /s
Nope. That's not how that works, that's why the lockdown doesn't.
That is exactly what happens in the case of cancer, if you're missing the reference. Medication is taken to abate symptoms and further medication to isolate cancerous cells and prevent spread. (lockdown).
If the cancer is small enough it is excised.
If the cancer has spread, it is given the nuclear treatment.
The reason for our current lockdown during covid not working... Is because they are constantly shifting the goalposts for what counts as covid.
The list of symptoms now is so broad as to be utterly useless in diagnosis
Oh, he might give up some 'money'. But what he won't give up is all the ownership, the cars, the boats, the properties, or the power to procure more of them for himself.
The rich schools are actually generally good though. So you're sacrificing the only good public schools for more mediocre ones.
It's not whether the schools are "rich." It's whether the schools educate the students or push wokeness.
Eliminate the State Education Monopoly, and schools will improve.
Re-establish Freedom of Association.
siege the city.
Nah, I mean really who or what will you be saving? New York is a cesspit of leftists.
A better solution would be to encourage the few remaining rational people to abandon New York city and New York state and move to battleground states to keep it sane.
Cities like New York deserve to end up like Detroit.
Is this supposed to be a surprise, or a bad thing? It's not good when someone like Zuckerberg has way more than he deserves, while others have far less than they deserve.
It will never happen to actual wealthy people like Zuckerberg. When Marxists are in charge of a society, It is always the middle class & working class that will have their "wealth" redistributed.
No lie there, but you can still have a limited redistributive system like in parts of Europe. My main concern is not even that Zuckerberg has too much money, though he does, it's that he uses it to corrupt institutions and democracy. As do so many other rich people, like Soros.
You're not wrong. And I don't know if there will ever be a proper solution to that problem.
Without going into detail, I'm probably more left on economics than most here at KIA2 and definitely at TheDonald. I consider myself a Safety Net Capitalist. But I am very anti-Communism, anti-Socialism and anti-Marxism because I know those types of governments are oppressive. I know how Marxist promises of "end of hierarchy", merely enhance the hierarchy and help those at the top fuck over those at the bottom by not allowing any upward mobility.
It's the same ol', same ol'. Their slogans are always directly opposed to their actions. The French revolutionaries, the forerunners of the Bolsheviks, also advocated 'liberte, egalite, fraternite' - but you got your head chopped off for being mildly moderate. That's neither liberty nor equality, as the man who gets to decide that you need your head chopped off is always more 'equal' than the rest of us.
Ideally, there would be a balance between different powers - so that no one is able to dominate the other and all of us. In America, in my view, the greater threat comes from private individuals and corporations than from government. They censor at will. They dominate the government through lobbyists. In my own Europe, I agree that too much government is the problem almost everywhere.
So people don't deserve to eat, have a roof over their heads, because they work in a job that is actually useful but less valued than a $250,000-salaried "Diversity Officer"?
I agree that the solution is not Marxist redistribution.
Redistribution is not Marxist by definition though. So yeah, I'd like to see money be redistributed from the Mark Zuckerbergs and George Soroses of the world to, for example, coal miners.
"It is only because the miner works his guts out that the superior can remain superior."
- George Orwell