Well, it's officially out in the open now
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
I'm thinking that all these cities are going to end up making Detroit of of the 70s-90s look like fucking Atlantis in comparison. Criminals will run rampant preying on the poor and the middle class, combined with new waves of gun control and anti-self defense policing (the only 'crime' that will be prosecuted will be self defense).
The middle class will be demolished through climate change legislation making everything much more expensive, while the waves of immigrants get moved to the suburbs and exurbs making fleeing the destruction impossible and unaffordable. Only the elites will have protection from criminals and schools that aren't absolute cesspools of racism and false achievement.
I know it's always been a big taboo with KiA, but do I really have to say "Unless we actually kill them..." at this point?
Not a winning argument at this point.
The appropriate response to Bill deBlasio is Bill deWall.
It's not really meant to be an argument.
Although, I will argue that if we know where this is headed, and we have been calling it out for years now, then we clearly have not been putting out "a winning argument" so far.
Liberalism is dying. I can't say whether calling for bloody revolution is or is not "a winning argument" at this point, but I can say that traditional liberal argument, through conversation and debate, is definitely a losing strategy at this point.