I'm glad you brought this up because it actually reinforces my point about rootlessness.
The CCP isn't beholden to anyone but the CCP; it is an amoral coalition of people thinking only about what's best for them within their own lifetimes. This resulted in them adhering to immoral policies (i.e., the one-child policy) to fix something that wasn't a problem to begin with.
They didn't mind killing off one of half the entire future generation of their nation, something that would have been a reprehensible act under a religious nation that adhered to its principles.
The knockon effect of this immoral decision has now had economical implications that has enforced social implications (videlicet of double the male population for the current generation, not enough job growth, shrinking marriage rates, women only seeking top-performing men, top-performing men selectively using women for sex but not marriage or creating families, etc.).
Now the CCP is trying to rapidly course-correct with government-sponsored marriage incentives, state-sponsored programs to encourage child-rearing. But it's all for nought because it's too late. Why?
Because in their lack of foresight they adopted the worst economic traits of feminist-captured Western societies: encouraging women to compete with men, abandon household duties, and pursue lifelong careers in competitive white-collar systems.
You're also correct that a lot of those pointless administrative jobs will be replaced by automotons and AI, making the female-focused workforce redundant.
Basically, the short-term solution to perceived resource shortages was to kill off one-half of their FUTURE population, which backfired immensely. They didn't account for marriage rates rapidly declining, top percentile men becoming philanderers, women becoming even more hypergamous, jobs shrinking, their main population aging out without financial recourse, and AI becoming a main replacement for useless corporate jobs.
Their economic downfall was because they had no moral foundations
Had they instead focused on cultivating jobs for their lower and middle class men -- exponentially reinvesting in farming and agriculture, and prioritising hiring young males for work -- they would have automatically created a sustainable ecosystem for women to WANT to marry young lads. They would have had a balanced population with enough excess women for the average bloke, and they wouldn't have had women competing with the men they sought to marry.
In many ways, the CCP is a prime example of what grounding your economic and social policies around short-term materialistic precepts looks like, and a nice counter-example as to why athiestic foundations cannot build nor sustain a growing, stable civilisaiton.
Christian values is what allowed you to have a safe enough civilisation to be built up so you could have the modern amenities to type the comment you did. Without those values this technology would not exist.
Furthermore, what got us into this mess is hedonistic pursuits from rootless people. Had those "Old Christian" people maintained Bibilical values we wouldn't even have a need for a forum like this because Liberal Progressivism would not exist in Occidental nations -- it would have been stomped because it represents the satanic principles and morally relative measures fostered by the people who now control the West.
Every White nation being subverted by Jeets, groids, and Muslims are doing exactly what you say, and it has resulted in the ensuing erasure of Whites (i.e., Sweden, Germany, France, U.K., etc.).
By throwing away Christian values, it invites in the moral degradation of rootless materialism and hedonism.
Any religion going forward must be grounded in the material world not just spiritual and must promote master morality not slave morality
China is doing this right now, and is imploding at a rapid rate because rootless morality anchored onto materialism means you have no reason to sacrifice, no reason to lay roots, and no reason to build outside of what you can gain for yourself. So marriage is collapsing, middle class is collapsing, and it's having a cascading effect on their broader society. That is what life without spiritual ascension looks like -- a race to the bottom of material gain.
the pagans, who once represented the greatest threat, became predictable, malleable, and controllable.
People who revel in the stagnating realm of moral relativity were never a threat to begin with; they have never been able to develop and maintain any kind of cohesive civilisation to push humanity forward.
I'll be honest, I did enjoy the remake of Alone in the Dark with David Harbour. Even though Harbour comes across a pedofile in real life, he seemed to be a decent pick for Carnby. I wasn't sure how well he would do given it seemed like an odd choice, but he brought some everyman appeal to his performance, and surprisingly he did not sleep walk through it. It made it decently enjoyable especially because it had the slower paced gameplay and more grounded combat mechanics I've been craving out of a game for a very long time.
That being said... the game makes it obvious it stars the uncomely hag playing Emily Hartwood, and boy is she portrayed as insufferable. It would have been better had she been played as a bit more of an uppity, posh, frightened English lass, because it could have increased the scare factors being put into her shoes, but the actress playing her just comes across as the typical snarky, self-aware type that we get in every kind of modern piece of media. Really detracted from an otherwise okay experience (the atmosphere in the game is done well, and the environment artists did a great job bringing the locations to life even though they're limited in scope).
Anyway, it's a shame we don't get more games with the actual gameplay of Alone in the Dark or that recent Evil Dead game that was made into a stupid asymmetrical multiplayer title -- I wish we had an Evil Dead game with those more grounded and fluid combat and movement mechanics, but with a linear story line Alone In The Dark, would have been right up my alley.
It would have to be guaranteed mortality rates the likes of which rival Arrowhead Hill or Hamburger Hill.
Genuinely curious, what makes her nominally on our side?
I don't have Twatter so she just seems like yet another foolish wench in my eyes. But maybe you have a different perspective that might make her seem less foolish.
There is literally a mission involving taking care of your kid -- at some point she becomes a single mother and there are some mini-games surrounding that. It was part of the leaked data -- along with the videos, mission scripts, cinematics and other stuff. Not sure if that's at the beginning of the game or later on, but yeah... playing as a single mother is peak cuckoldry.
This isn't a business, this is psychological warfare.
THIS is the kind of brevity I need to start employing in normie spaces.
You've summed up this pipeline of agitprop succinctly here, and I'll be using that line next time to explain why they do what they do, because trying to bring awareness to people using multiple paragraphs, ties back to Critical Theory and examples of financial losses over the last two decades just loses the average normie, but this line best explains what's actually happening without having to do a deep dive into the topic matter.
I have this on my watchlist but I sure hope it doesn't suck. I was sorely disappointed with War Machine and The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare; the latter was just more Jewish apologetics. Hopefully they don't find a way to turn this movie into that.
Nah, this is very common. This woman went into a rapefugee camp after being told NOT to go alone, and did so anyway to report on the refugee crisis because "muh poor refugees", claiming she had done so many times before, and rightfully got raped for being stupid:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/canadian-woman-recovers-after-rape-in-french-migrant-camp-1.694524
Wow that's even worse than I imagined and I already had pretty low expectations. Ha, that is parody levels of bad.
Wow it made close to three quarters of 100 mill? If Armie Hammer was smart he'd have his pay on the backend in percentages based on scale.
That said, Uwe Boll needs to be a producer, not a director, He needs to find actual talented directors and produce movies with based messages.
He makes the frogs feel like it's been turned down to simmer.
Isn't that the gist of that movie One Battle After Another? I haven't looked it up or anything, but it looked like pure anti-Straight White male agitprop just from the posters alone, and it also won some awards.
the impressionable ones who bought the "all men suck" story from a predatory man-hater
Okay yeah, this one here is very common these days. Was watching some stupid wench give her testimony -- she's now in her 40s, and spent all her youth as a lesbian because all her friends were faggots and convinced her she was a faggot and got her to watch some faggot shows and it turned her on so she started engaging in the faggot lifestyle.
She eventually realised she was living a degenerate life and came out of it and NOW wants to find a good man to settle down with, but man she was foolish for buying into that stupidity and wasting 20 years of her life being a faggot whore.
Yeah, sadly South Korea is pretty converged. I watched this one action flick about an assassin carrying out missions for this organisation, and the main subplot revolved around her daughter being a dyke, and the mother coming to terms of accepting it. Pretty ridiculous.
GLAAD is being funded to push media organisations to promote more "positive portrayals" of people with HIV/AIDs. That has been one of their big pushes over the last so many years.
They literally WANT people to get AIDs.
While reductive, it's not entirely wrong...
They basically fall into the categories of:
- Men haters
- Whores
Oh absolutely. Even the so-called counter-Lefty culture content creators grovel CONSTANTLY about how just because they hold a specific opinion doesn't mean they're against [insert demographic/topic here].
Endymion and Legendary Drops do it ALL the time. They're constantly prefacing everything they say by trying not to offend anyone. The only one who holds his ground with a sizable audience is SyntheticMan but he's shadowbanned beyond the borders of Tartarus.
You're absolutely right -- it's a feminine culture because majority of these blokes have grown up without fathers, they do not know what it means to be masculine, and to hold frame on issues without conceding ground or being undeservedly gracious to the people who hate them.
First Rampage movie was probably his most competently made film. It still had its issues, but there was a general sense of dread and tension once things got going and that's not an easy thing to pull off.
The hurdle wouldn't be too hard to overcome, but a lot of it boils down to competence. Does India and China actually have competent and skilled filmmakers?
Films like War from 2019 was one of India's biggest film exports because it was essentially everything that Hollywood USED to make before it turned into pure DEI-slop. But War is a rarity among India's output.
Content wise, both China and India focus on having handsome leads who are stoic and masculine with beautiful female co-stars, but oftentimes the stories are kind of dumb or the production values are inconsistent. I think most audiences wouldn't care about the blatant nationalistic propaganda India and China are known for if the films were actually entertaining, something that Hollywood used to be able to do before being overwhelmed by Liberal Progressive ideologies.
Unfortunately, we're now looking at the outcome to the response of the laws of the extreme.
Woke was so bad that the response to anything that isn't AS woke is that it must be good. The distribution curve has changed on what "good" is because woke was so bad.
So now we're seeing a lot of normies accept woke corposlop that isn't AS bad as the wokest crap out there get preferential treatment because the curve for what's considered "woke" has been raised.
The Overton Window has moved so far Left now that junk like Obsession get called "good" even by people who are supposed to be anti-woke.
In ten year's time we'll have movies with tranny superheroes becoming blockbusrter successes while the so-called anti-woke crowd will call it "good" because maybe it makes a joke at the expense of feminists or does the bare minimum to criticise Pakistani rape gangs.
There hasn't been a movie to come out in a long while with a plot as hilarious as the outcome of this event.
Fact is truly stranger than fiction.
His name almost looks like a portmanteau for "subhuman".