2
parodious 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is a definitive way to make that determination on some issues.

2
parodious 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some things are absolute truths and not debatable. Your position is essentially moral relativism and assumes all possible views are valid. They are not.

2
parodious 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm a believer. I'm not critical of my religion, I'm critical of people who claim to be Christians.

With that said I am not perfect either.

2
parodious 2 points ago +2 / -0

Indeed, many Christians sadly misunderstand their own religion.

3
parodious 3 points ago +3 / -0

True. However, this contract which applied to the Israelites was fulfilled 2000 years ago.

2
parodious 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is from the Judeo part.

4
parodious 4 points ago +5 / -1

That is absurd reasoning. Utter non sequitur.

1
parodious 1 point ago +1 / -0

I already addressed this. Straight couples who don't want kids are not disordered.

3
parodious 3 points ago +3 / -0

Heterosexuality is a mechanism that is consistent with the procreative goal of life. If we consider the metaphor that couples who don't want kids are "in the wrong room," gays are not merely in the wrong building, they are in the wrong city. Heterosexuals go 99.99% of the way towards procreating and stop just short for moral reasons (not producing offspring they can't take care of willy-nilly). Gays instead perform a confused at best, and perverted at worst, simulacrum of the real act.

You simply cannot deny biology and that humans are geared toward sexual reproduction.

2
parodious 2 points ago +3 / -1

There exist many disorders.

7
parodious 7 points ago +8 / -1

Being gay is plainly wrong because humans are a sexually dimorphic species.

5
parodious 5 points ago +5 / -0

Holocaust denier is a slur used by Jewish supremacists and their unwitting vassals, not too unlike calling right-wing people Nazis.

1
parodious 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any evidence of them being actual Nazis is weaker as they seem more akin to the type of "Nazi" you see in false flags.

If you're unable to see this as the CIA-backed insurgency group that it is, your thinking is clouded.

7
parodious 7 points ago +8 / -1

https://www.algemeiner.com/2014/06/24/ukraine-jewish-billionaires-batallion-sent-to-fight-pro-russian-militias/

Among those going into battle from the Ukrainian side are some 500 trained fighters in the self-declared Azov battalion, backed by Jewish energy magnate and Dnipropetrovsk region governor, Igor Kolomoisky, according to Israel’s Ma’ariv daily.

https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-russian-44110741

from the original on 22 March 2019. Retrieved 19 October 2019. One of the most famous examples is Natan Khazin, the commander of the so-called "Jewish Hundred" during the Euromaidan. He claimed that he did not see significant manifestations of anti-Semitism during the Maidan. He and his comrades-in-arms jokingly called themselves "Jewish Bandera" and also stylized the red and black flag of the UPA, adding the Star of David to it. It is significant that Mr. Khazin himself called himself one of the founders of the Azov battalion.

8
parodious 8 points ago +9 / -1

The Ukraine "Nazis" are literally Jewish, it was revealed late last year. The main guy has a menorah on his night stand.

13
parodious 13 points ago +13 / -0

HR is a fake discipline for dumb yet high-paid women that should be abolished.

6
parodious 6 points ago +7 / -1

They're unidentified, the leap to extraterrestrials is insane. They could just be drones.

5
parodious 5 points ago +5 / -0

Therefore we'll invest in climate startups and then pass climate policies that create markets for the companies we're invested in, while also harming the middle class.

-1
parodious -1 points ago +1 / -2

Total nonsense.

6
parodious 6 points ago +6 / -0

I have a long history of getting screwed by the medical industry to a life-ruining degree so this has not been a red pill for me, just a sad "yep." The crossover of healthcare workers x politicians was truly a sight to behold.

1
parodious 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am not challenging your decision but for the sake of argument, I contend that if quoting what people that identify with that group literally, actually say is against the rules, then we truly are not free.

I kindly request that you reconsider this rule as it is is a woke rule. Inferior is one thing, but conspiring ought to be fair game if one believes it is in fact happening. Thank you.

1
parodious 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would put forth in my defense that sarcastically copying something that certain people say, in an echoey way, is no explicit attack on them nor even an implicit one against whites.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›