A blog post filled with intimate knowledge about the going-ons of people who let their reputation shape other people's opinion of them. Mr Fry just knowing what this blog poster already knows is enough to damn him (But not the person who wrote the blog post!).
This is all very silly and unbecoming of people who scrutinise the media for their tall tales and omissions of fact.
Had they stated that Stephen Fry's husband, Elliott Spencer, is almost exactly 30 years younger than him there would be something substantive in their opinion. Not worthy of much but at least there would be something. But solely rumour and riling up people's compassions based on anecdotes - that's a sure-fire way to show a credible argument to ethically minded information discerners!
Oh wait!:
(Fry is half-Jewish on his mother's side, but many more people implicated in the article (such as Oscar Wilde and Peter Tatchell) are fully European.)
Now I see it! There it is. He's not European! He's a Joo!
Shazbat!
He who smelt it dealt it.
He who denied it, supplied it.
We really can go on with this all day but I'd suggest you take to Mastadon or Bluesky were lots of people think it's OK to throw around slanderous liable as if it was going out of fashion.
He could be the protected superclass of Jew who gets away with murder. But, if you've ever read anything he's written, he's just a man with an imagination who inspires others to be creative too.
It's only a couple of small time outlets.
The real victory comes from downing the larger ones that fed into them.
The Guardian, The BBC, CNN and the CBC were all strong proponents against us.
Above them there is Hollywood and the music industry.
Above them politics and religion.
Epstein, P Diddy, The Clintons and everyone else who flexed on their authoritarian Left leanings need to understand that we are all playing the same game. Nobody likes to play with cheaters and they've been caught.
A retraction, an amendment to the rules and an apology. That would have been all it took in August of 2014 for none of this to have happened. But they had to try tea bagging for a finishing move and look where it brought them.
Christopher Marlowe
Richard Baines
Gore Vidal
Neither of these people are Stephen Fry (But having knowledge of them speaks volumes).
Let's try a little exercise here. The_Shadow_of_Intent protested a little too much about paedophilia and fiction. Turns out that Harry, from down the road, said he was molested as a child which makes him more likely to be a predator in his adulthood.
There! You are now as equally valid as Stephen Fry is of being guilty of the claims you put forward. Blame Harry from down the road.
The actual acts of homosexuality and paedophilia in connection to people associated with the BBC is more well known. Any claims of abuse would have had the ability to have surfaced and so their absence is something to consider.
I could be wrong in all of this but I strongly believe the innocent until proven otherwise foundation of proper justice. I hope neither of us finds ourselves in any situation where proper due process and the rule of law are thrown out for social justice witch-hunts.
This is just rumour and hearsay pushing for a cancel culture.
Have an opinion, suppose and conject but there is nothing put against Stephen Fry (As yet at least) to say that he is anything other than honourable.
Well, apart from him liking Apple products. But everyone's welcome to a vice like that.
All the other games studios will be shitting themselves just now. They'd either put everything on hold or pulled it forward, unfinished, because they didn't stand a chance against GTA.
Now all those plans will be wrought.
I'm sure that new girl who started in the public toilet cleaning services (Melisa or something or other) will be ecstatic that there's fresh shit to rub herself in while screaming at the mirror.
Apple and Epic were locked in a battle because Fortnight (And Epic game) charged more for in-game credits on the Apple store than it did in-game through Epic's store (30% more).
Apple won the original battle that was put against them from Epic as they hosted a "Paid for" game on their store and therefore Epic couldn't make any profit from Apple users if they hadn't already made profit through their services. A model Apple used across all of its services.
Epic then made Fortnight free-to-play (With exclusive skins for players who had already bought it) which pulled that rug out from Apple's feet. Apple then took them to court stating that they were required monies from Epic for 'Hosting' their content in their store in the first place.
Long(ish) legal battle later and Apple lost, and some of the EU rules for microtransactions are now in place, by US law, on the Apple store.
In future, at the moment at least, it will now be more profitable for a company to release a free version of a game which they charge for later through optional DLCs/microtransactions which bypass the vendor of said gatekept community.
This will be appealed and there will be more tussle but, for the moment, Apple users would benefit from going for free AAA games as more money can be turned to more development of said games.
They've surprised their audiences every time they've released. Sometimes for the better, sometimes not.
But this particular game has been the target of all these Mary Sues, Uncle Toms and Aunt Jemimas (Their gender, libido and complexion normative allies too) for a long time. The original founders fled by 2020 and so it's been a cesspit of angry unskilled sex obsessed people for a while now.
We might get lucky and get a final DLC for GTA V with Lazlo doing a Dark Knight Harvey Dent and being the hero Gotham needs right now xD
Has Rockstar figured out that lecturing all of their customers like an auntie Denise is not the right way to sell the next instalment of this previously controversial, for all the right reasons, franchise?
A year to go still for all those hyped for playing this.
No doubt it will be consoles first, Rocksteady only, then an Epic release with Steam being around 2030.
As long as the content is good I've no issue with that. But with money being money and microtransactions having been their bread and butter for over a decade now, I'm not sure that's going to be the case this time around.
I sure hope I don't know anyone invested in Valnet xD
Abacus Data's first words on their website:
We are Canada’s most sought-after and influential full-service market and public opinion research agency.
Translation:
We say whatever shit you pay us to say.
Add that on top an apologetic, polite, unchallenging demographic - eh?
Well that's what he gets for being an atheistic, racist, homophobic, misogynistic, Trump supporting Nazi sycophant on Twitter who kicks kittens on little girl's birthdays.
I'm sure everyone in the industry will step forward and help him out since he's deep in their wool.
You expect the archetypal punching bag which made the ability to punch possible to get praise?
#RemoveAllStraightWhiteMen and give it 5 minutes. Bitches be cutting corners and backstabbing like it'd gone out of fashion.
We need a solid structure to rebel against, and it's got to be straight, white and male (Preferably Jewish for some reason).
I'm not a religious person. I've considered it greatly and it just isn't for me.
That said, I don't see why attacking religion is a good idea for anyone.
Firstly it upsets those within that religion and secondly those doing it aren't doing it for anything other than hatred.
Why not start a new religion rather than tear one down?
If history has taught us anything it is that religion, regardless of creed, comes with the might of god behind it.
That always ends in suffering for many people who had no horse in the game.
These "Two men holding hands" is two men sniggering at people who pray to their dead loved ones.
It won't be a nancyboy who delivers anyone from evil.
When that Master Race meets those Chosen People, all hell breaks loose!
Only at cinemas!